UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.    )
Filed by the Registrant  ý                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ý No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
  1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
  2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
  3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
  4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
  5) Total fee paid:
¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  1) Amount Previously Paid:
  2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
  3) Filing Party:
  4) Date Filed:
SEC 1913 (02-02)      
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
 



ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St.
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858
NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held April 30, 2014May 5, 2015

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Isabella Bank Corporation will be held on Wednesday, April 30, 2014Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at the Comfort Inn Conference Center, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan. The meeting is for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following items of business:
1.The election of fivefour directors.
2.To hold an advisory, non-binding vote on executive compensation of named executive officers.
3.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed March 17, 201412, 2015 as the record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please vote:
1.By mail: Indicate your choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, sign, date, and return your proxy form in the enclosed envelope. Note that if stock is held in more than one name, all parties should sign the proxy form; or
2.By internet - www.proxyvote.com: Have your proxy form in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form; or
3.By phone - 1-800-690-6903 (toll-free): Have your proxy form in hand and then follow the instructions.
By order of the Board of Directors
Debra Campbell, Secretary
Dated: March 31, 2014
26, 2015



Table of Contents

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St.
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858
PROXY STATEMENT
General Information
As used in this Proxy Statement, references to "the Corporation", “Isabella,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refer to the consolidated entity consisting of Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.subsidiary, Isabella Bank. Isabella Bank Corporation refers solely to the parent holding company, and the “Bank” refers to Isabella Bank Corporation’s subsidiary, Isabella Bank.
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies, to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) which is to be held on Wednesday, April 30, 2014Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn Conference Center, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and in this Proxy Statement.
This Proxy Statement has been mailed on March 31, 201426, 2015 to all holders of record of common stock as of the record date. If a shareholder’s shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, or other nominee, then that party should give the shareholder instructions for voting the shareholder’s shares.
Voting at the Meeting
We have fixed the close of business on March 17, 201412, 2015 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. We have only one class of common stock and no preferred stock. As of March 17, 2014,12, 2015, there were 7,707,5247,804,200 shares of stock outstanding. Each outstanding share entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each separate matter presented for vote at the meeting. You may vote on matters that are properly presented at the Annual Meeting by attending the meeting and casting a vote, signing and returning the enclosed proxy, voting on the internet, or voting by phone. You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by filing with the Corporation an instrument revoking it, filing a duly executed proxy bearing a later date (including a proxy given over the internet or by phone) or by attending the meeting and electing to vote in person. You are encouraged to vote by mail, internet, or phone.
We will hold the Annual Meeting if a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy. If you sign and return the proxy, those shares will be counted to determine if there is a quorum, even if you abstain or fail to vote on any of the proposals.
Your broker may not vote on the election of directors or the advisory vote to approve the named executive officers' compensation if you do not furnish instructions for such proposals. You should use the voting instruction card provided by us to instruct the broker to vote the shares, or else your shares will be considered “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes are shares held by brokers or nominees as to which voting instructions have not been received from the shares’ beneficial owner or the individual entitled to vote those shares and the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power under rules applicable to broker-dealers. Under these rules, ProposalsProposal 1 and 2 areis not itemsan item on which brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on your behalf unless you have furnished voting instructions.
At this year’s Annual Meeting, you will elect one director to serve for a term of one year and four directors to serve for a term of three years. You may vote in favor, against, or withhold votes for any or all nominees. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. Shares not voted, including broker non-votes, have no effect on the elections.
In voting on the advisory, nonbinding proposal to approve the executive compensation described in this proxy statement, a shareholder may vote in favor of the advisory proposal, vote against the advisory proposal or abstain from voting. A majority of the shares represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this advisory proposal must be voted in favor of the proposal for it to pass. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on the Board of Directors, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on the Board of Directors. In counting votes on the advisory, nonbinding proposal to approve executive compensation matters, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

1


Table of Contents

Proposal 1-Election of Directors
The Board of Directors (the "Board") currently consists of eleven (11) members divided into three classes, with the directors in the class noted below upbeing elected for re-election at the Annual Meeting. On September 15, 2013 Wilson C. Lauer passed away and on October 31, 2013 Sandra L. Caul retired from the Board, resulting in the numbera term of directors being reduced to ten (10). The number of Board members was increased to its current level by the appointment of Jae A. Evans to the Board on January 1, 2014. Dennis P. Angner, whose term expires atthree years. At the Annual Meeting, has been nominated for election to a one year term through 2015 and Dr. JeffreyDennis P. Angner, Richard J. Barnes, G. Charles Hubscher, David J. Maness,Barz, Jae A. Evans, and W. Joseph Manifold,Michael McGuire, whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting, have been nominated for election to three year termsserve through 2017the 2018 Annual Meeting for the reasons described below.
Except as otherwise specified, proxies will be voted for election of the fivefour nominees. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, proxies will be voted for such other person, if any, as shall be designated. However, we know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur. The fivefour nominees who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.
Nominees and current directors, including their principal occupation for the last five or more years, age, and length of service as a director, are listed below.
We unanimously recommend that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.
Director Qualifications
Board members are highly qualified and represent your best interests. We select nominees who:
Have extensive business leadershipleadership.
Bring a diverse perspective and experienceexperience.
Are independentobjective and collegialcollegial.
Have high ethical standards and have demonstrated sound business judgmentjudgment.
Are willing and able to commit the significant time and effort to effectively fulfill their responsibilitiesresponsibilities.
Are active in and knowledgeable of their respective communitiescommunities.
Each nominee and current director possesspossesses these qualities and provides a diverse complement of specific business skills experience, and knowledge including extensive financial and accounting experience, knowledge of banking, small business operating experience, and specific knowledge of customer market segments including agriculture, oil and gas, health care, manufacturing, and retail.experience.
The following describes the key qualifications each director brings to the Board, in addition to the general qualifications described above and the information included in the biographical summaries provided below.
DirectorProfessional
Standing experience
in Chosenchosen
Fieldfield
 Expertise
in financial
or related
field
 Audit
Committee
Financial
Expert
 Civic and
community
involvement
 Leadership
and team
building
skills
 Diversity
by race,
gender, or
cultural
 Geo-
graphical
diversity
 Finance Tech-
nology
 Market-
ing
 Govern-
ance
 Entre-
preneurial
skills
 Human
Resources
 Bank
business
segment
represent-
ation
David J. ManessX 
 
 X X 
 
 
 X 
 
 X 
 X
Dennis P. AngnerX X 
 X X 
 
 X X 
 X 
 
 
Dr. Jeffrey J. BarnesX 
 
 X X 
 X 
 
 
 
 X 
 X
Richard J. BarzX X 
 X X 
 
 X 
 X 
 
 X 
X
Jae A. EvansX X 
 X X 
 
 X 
 X 
 
 X 
G. Charles HubscherX X 
 X X 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 X
Thomas L. KleinhardtX 
 
 X X 
 X X 
 X 
 X 
 X
Joseph LaFramboiseX 
 
 X X 
 X 
 
 X 
 
 
 
W. Joseph ManifoldX X X X X 
 
 X X 
 
 
 
 
W. Michael McGuireX X X X X 
 X X X 
 X 
 
 
Sarah R. OppermanX 
 
 X X X X 
 
 X 
 X 
 X

2


Table of Contents

The following table identifies individual Board members serving on each of our standing committees:
DirectorAudit Nominating and Corporate Governance Compensation and Human ResourceInformation Technology
David J. Maness
Xo
 
Xo
 
Xc
Xo
Dennis P. Angner

 
 
Dr. Jeffrey J. BarnesX  
 X
Richard J. Barz

 
 
Jae A. Evans
 
 

G. Charles HubscherX  
 X
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
 
 X
Xc
Joseph LaFramboiseXX  X X
W. Joseph Manifold
Xc
 X  X
W. Michael McGuireX  
Xc
X X
Sarah R. Opperman
 
 X
C — Chairperson     
O — Ex-Officio     
Director NomineeNominees for TermTerms Ending in 20152018
Dennis P. Angner (age 58)59) has been a director of Isabella Bank Corporation and the Bank since 2000. Mr. Angner has been principally employed by the Corporation since 1984 and has served as President of Isabella Bank Corporation since December 30, 2001 and CFO since January 1, 2010. Mr. Angner served as Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation from December 30, 2001 through December 31, 2009. He is a past Chair of the Michigan Bankers Association and is currently serving as vice chairmanChairman of its taxation committee, is a member of the American Bankers Association Government Relations Council, and served on the Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.
Richard J. Barz (age 66) has been a director of the Bank since 2000 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2002. Mr. Barz retired as Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation on December 31, 2013 after over 41 years of service with the Corporation. Mr. Barz was Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation from 2010 to 2013 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank from 2001 to July 2012. Mr. Barz has been very active in community organizations and events. He is a past Chairman of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, is the current Chairman of the Middle Michigan Development Corporation Board of Directors, and serves on several boards and committees for Central Michigan University and various volunteer organizations throughout mid-Michigan.
Jae A. Evans (age 58) was appointed a director of Isabella Bank Corporation and the Bank and elected Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation effective January 1, 2014. Mr. Evans has been employed by the Corporation since 2008 and has over 38 years of banking experience. He served as Chief Operations Officer of the Bank from June 2011 to December 31, 2013 and President of the Greenville Division of the Bank from January 1, 2008 to June 2011. Mr. Evans is a board member for The Community Bankers of Michigan, Art Reach of Mid Michigan, and is the Chair of the EightCAP governing board. Mr. Evans is also past Vice Chair of the Carson City Hospital, was president of the Greenville Rotary Club, and past Chair of The Community Bankers of Michigan.
W. Michael McGuire (age 65) has been a director of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2007 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. McGuire, an attorney, retired in August 2013 as the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products, headquartered in Midland, Michigan.
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2016
Thomas L. Kleinhardt (age 60) has been a director of the Bank since 1998 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. Mr. Kleinhardt is President of McGuire Chevrolet, is active in the Clare Kiwanis Club, and past coach of the girls Varsity Basketball team for both Farwell High School and Clare High School.
Joseph LaFramboise (age 65) has been a director of the Bank since 2007 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. He is a retired Sales and Marketing Executive of Ford Motor Company. Mr. LaFramboise is an Ambassador of Eagle Village in Evart, Michigan.

3


Table of Contents

Sarah R. Opperman (age 55) has been a director of the Bank and Isabella Bank Corporation since July 1, 2012. Ms. Opperman is the owner of Opperman Consulting, LLC, which provides public affairs counsel. She was previously employed for 28 years by The Dow Chemical Company, where she held leadership roles in public and government affairs. Ms. Opperman is Vice Chair of the CMU Board of Trustees and chairs the Board's Finance and Facilities Committee.  She also is a member of the CMU Development Board.  She is a member of the Mid Michigan Health's Corporate Board of Directors, as well as its Continuing Care Board and Fund Development Committee.  Ms. Opperman also serves on the United Way of Midland County Board.  
Director Nominees for Terms Ending in 2017
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes (age 51)53) has been a director of the Bank since 2007 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. Dr. Barnes is a physician and shareholder in Lansing Ophthalmology PC. He is a former member of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors.
G. Charles Hubscher (age 60)61) has been a director of the Bank since 2004 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. Mr. Hubscher is President of Hubscher and Son, Inc., a sand and gravel producer. He is a director of the National Stone and Gravel Association, the Michigan Aggregates Association, serves on the Board of Trustees for the Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation, and is a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals for Deerfield Township.
David J. Maness (age 60)61) has been a director of the Bank since 2003 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2004. Mr. Maness has served as chairmanChairman of the boardBoard for the Corporation and the Bank since 2010. He is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical consulting services company. Mr. Maness is currently serving as a director for the Michigan Oil & Gas Association, and he previously served on the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.
W. Joseph Manifold (age 62)63) has been a director of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2003 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. Manifold is CFO of Federal Broach Holdings LLC, a holding company which operates several manufacturing companies. Previously, he was a senior manager with Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Company. Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Manifold served on the Isabella Community Credit Union Board and was ChairmanPresident of the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2015
Richard J. Barz (age 65) has been a director of the Bank since 2000 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2002. Mr. Barz retired as Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation on December 31, 2013 after over 41 years of service with the Corporation. Mr. Barz was Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010 and President and CEO of the Bank from 2001 to July 2012. Mr. Barz has been very active in community organizations and events. He is a past chairman of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, is the current chairman of the Middle Michigan Development

3

Table of Contents

Corporation Board of Directors, and serves on several boards and committees for Central Michigan University and various volunteer organizations throughout mid-Michigan.
Jae A. Evans (age 57) was appointed a director of Isabella Bank Corporation and the Bank and elected Chief Executive Officer of Isabella Bank Corporation effective January 1, 2014. Mr. Evans has been employed by the Corporation since 2008 and has over 36 years of banking experience. He served as Chief Operations Officer of the Bank through December 31, 2013 and President of the Greenville Division of the Bank from January 1, 2008 to June 2011. Mr. Evans is a board member for The Community Bankers of Michigan, Art Reach of Mid Michigan, and is the chair of the EightCAP governing board. Mr Evans is also past vice-chair of the Carson City Hospital, was president of the Greenville Rotary Club, and just completed his term as chair of The Community Bankers of Michigan.
W. Michael McGuire (age 64) has been a director of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2007 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. McGuire, an attorney, retired in August 2013 as the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products, headquartered in Midland, Michigan.
Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2016
Thomas L. Kleinhardt (age 59) has been a director of the Bank since 1998 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. Mr. Kleinhardt is President of McGuire Chevrolet, is active in the Clare Kiwanis Club, and coaches the girls Varsity Basketball team at Farwell High School.
Joseph LaFramboise (age 64) has been a director of the Bank since 2007 and of Isabella Bank Corporation since 2010. He is a retired Sales and Marketing Executive of Ford Motor Company. Mr. LaFramboise is an Ambassador of Eagle Village in Evart, Michigan.
Sarah R. Opperman (age 54) has been a director of the Bank and Isabella Bank Corporation since July 1, 2012. Ms. Opperman is the owner of Opperman Consulting, LLC, which provides public affairs counsel. She was previously employed for 28 years by The Dow Chemical Company, where she held leadership roles in public and government affairs. She was inducted into the CMU Journalism Hall of Fame and is a recipient of the Dow Genesis Award for Excellence in People Development. Ms. Opperman serves on the CMU Board of Trustees, the CMU Development Board, the Mid Michigan Health Corporate Board of Directors, and the Mid Michigan Health Fund Development Committee. She also served on the CMU Research Corporation Board of Directors.
Each of the directors has been engaged in their stated professions for more than five years.
Other Named Executive Officers
Steven D. Pung (age 64)65), President of the Bank, and a member of the Board of Directors of Financial Group Information Services (a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation) has been employed by the Bank since 1979. Jerome E. Schwind (age 47)48), Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank, has been employed by the Bank since 1999. David J. Reetz (age 53)54), Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank, has been employed by the Bank since 1987.
All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Proposal 2-Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The compensation of the Corporation’s principal executive officer, retired principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and three other most highly compensated executive officers (named executive officers) is described below under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Officers”. Shareholders are urged to read these sections of this proxy statement, which discusses the Corporation’s compensation policies and procedures with respect to its named executive officers.4

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shareholders will be asked at the Annual Meeting to provide their support with respect to the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers by voting on the following advisory, non-binding resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Isabella Bank Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, for purposes of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

4

Table of Contents

The advisory vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as a say-on-pay advisory vote, is non-binding on the Board of Directors.  Although non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee value constructive dialogue on executive compensation and other important governance topics with the Corporation’s shareholders and encourage all shareholders to vote their shares on this matter.  The Board of Directors and the Compensation and Human Resource Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation programs. The Board believes shareholders should consider the following in determining whether to approve this proposal:

The Corporation is not required to provide any severance or termination pay or benefits to any named executive officer;
Each member of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee is independent under the applicable standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market Marketplace Rules;
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee continually monitors the Corporation’s performance and adjusts compensation practices accordingly; and
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee regularly assesses the Corporation’s individual and total compensation programs against peer companies, the general marketplace and other industry data points.
Unless otherwise instructed, validly executed proxies will be voted “FOR” this resolution.

We unanimously recommend that you vote FOR the nonbinding advisory resolution approving the executive compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers.

Corporate Governance
Director Independence
We have adopted the director independence standards as defined under of the NASDAQ Stock Market Marketplace Rules. We have determined that Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes, G. Charles Hubscher, Thomas L. Kleinhardt, Joseph LaFramboise, David J. Maness, W. Joseph Manifold, W. Michael McGuire, and Sarah R. Opperman are independent directors. Former directors Sandra L. Caul and Wilson C. Lauer, were also determined to be independent directors. Richard J. Barz is not independent as he retired as CEO of Isabella Bank Corporation on December 31, 2013. Jae A. Evans is not independent as he is employed as CEO of Isabella Bank Corporation. Dennis P. Angner is not independent as he is employed as President and CFO of Isabella Bank Corporation.
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
Our Governance Policy provides that only directors who are deemed to be independent as set forth by the NASDAQ Stock Market Marketplace Rules and SEC rules are eligible to hold the office of chairperson. Additionally, the chairpersons of Board established committees must also be independent directors. It is our belief that having a separate chairperson and CEO best serves the interest of the shareholders. The Board elects its chairperson at the first Board meeting following the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. Independent members of the Board meet without inside directors at least twice per year.
Management is responsible for our day-to-day risk management and the Board’s role is to engage in informed oversight. The Board utilizes committees to oversee risks associated with compensation, governance, and governance. Financial Group Information Services, our information processing subsidiary, is responsible for overseeing risks associated with information technology. The Isabella Bank Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing credit, investment, interest rate, and trust risks. The chairpersons of the respective boards or committees report on their activities on a regular basis.
Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and those of independent auditors, our system of internal controls, our financial reporting and system of disclosure controls, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

5

Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance
The Board met 1214 times during 2013.2014. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2013.2014. The Board has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Compensation and Human Resource Committee, and an Information Technology Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors. Information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee, its membership, and the number of meetings held during the year, is set forth in the “Audit Committee Report” included elsewhere in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board, which is available on the Bank’s website: www.isabellabank.com.
In accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, directors Manifold and McGuire meet the requirements of Audit Committee Financial Expert and have been so designated. The Audit Committee also consists of directors Barnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, and Maness (ex-officio).
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We have a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of independent directors. The Committee consists of directors LaFramboise, Maness (ex-officio), Manifold, and McGuire. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held onetwo meeting in 2013,2014, with all directorscommittee members attending the meeting. The Board has approved a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter which is available on the Bank’s website: www.isabellabank.com.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for nomination to the Board for approval. TheThis Committee in evaluating nominees, including incumbent directors and any nominees put forth by shareholders, considers business experience, skills, character, judgment, leadership experience, and their knowledge of the geographical markets, business segments or other criteria the Committee deems relevant and appropriate based on the current composition of the Board. TheThis Committee considers diversity in identifying members with respect to our geographical markets served and the business experience of the nominee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, as potential nominees, persons recommended by shareholders. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mt.

5



Pleasant, Michigan 48858 and include the shareholder’s name, address and number of shares of the Corporation owned by the shareholder. The recommendation should also include the name, age, address and qualifications of the candidate. Recommendations for the 20152016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be delivered no later than December 1, 2014.November 27, 2015. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all potential director nominees in the same manner, whether the nominations are received from a shareholder, or otherwise.
Compensation and Human Resource Committee
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to our Board the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, benefit plans, and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The committeeThis Committee consists of independent directors Barnes, Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Maness, Manifold, McGuire, and Opperman. The committeeCompensation and Human Resource Committee held two meetingthree meetings during 20132014 with all directorscommittee members in attendance. This Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board that is available on the Bank’s website: www.isabellabank.com.
Information Technology Committee
The Information Technology Committee is responsible for reviewing and monitoring information technology risks. Oversight includes customer data, physical and information security, disaster planning, equipment and programs, and the audit process. This Committee consists of directors Angner, Evans, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Maness (ex-officio), and McGuire and other members of senior management. The Information Technology Committee held two meetings during 2014 with all committee members in attendance.
Communications with the Board
Shareholders may communicate with the Board by sending written communications to the attention of the Corporation’s Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858.48858. Communications will be forwarded to the Board or the appropriate committee, as soon as practicable.
Code of Ethics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to the CEO and CFO, is available on the Bank’s website: www.isabellabank.com.


6


Table of Contents

Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The 20132014 Audit Committee consisted of directors Barnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, Maness (ex-officio), Manifold, and McGuire.
The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services by our independent auditors, or any other auditing or accounting firm, if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services. The Audit Committee has established general guidelines for the permissible scope and nature of any permitted non-audit services in connection with its annual review of the audit plan and reviews the guidelines with the Board.
Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviewed with management and the independent auditors, management’s assertion on the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.2014.
The Audit Committee reviewed with our independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those described in Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with Audit Committees”, as may be modified or supplemented. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, as may be modified or supplemented, and has discussed with the independent auditor the independent auditors’ independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with our internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal and external independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial reporting process. The Audit Committee held five meetings during 2013,2014, and all committee members attended 75% or more of the meetings.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132014 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson LLC as the independent auditors for the 20142015 audit.
Respectfully submitted,
W. Joseph Manifold, Audit Committee Chairperson
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes
G. Charles Hubscher
Joseph LaFramboise
David J. Maness (ex-officio)
W. Michael McGuire


7


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation and benefits for the CEO, President and CFO, and executive officers. TheThis Committee evaluates and approves our executive officer and senior management compensation plans, policies, and programs. The CEO conductsrecommends to this Committee an appropriate salary for the CFO and named executive officers based on their annual performance reviews for named executive officers, excluding himself and recommends an appropriate salary to the Committee based on the performance review and the officer’s years of service along with competitive market data.
Compensation Objectives
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee considers asset growth with the safety and soundness objectives and earnings per share to be the primary ratios in measuring financial performance. Our philosophy is to maximize long-term return to shareholders consistent with safe and sound banking practices, while maintaining the commitment to superior customer and community service. We believe that the performance of executive officers in managing the business should be the basis for determining overall compensation. Consideration is also given to overall economic conditions and current competitive forces in the market place. The objectives of thethis Committee are to effectively balance salaries and potential compensation to an officer’s individual management responsibilities and encourage each of them to realize their potential for future contributions. The objectives are designed to attract and retain high performing executive officers who will provide leadership while attaining earnings and performance goals.
What the Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward
Our compensation programs are designed to reward dedicated and conscientious employment, loyalty in terms of continued employment, attainment of job related goals and overall profitability. In measuring an executive officer’s contributions, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee considers numerous factors including, among other things, our growth in terms of asset size and increase in earnings per share. In rewarding loyalty and long-term service, we provide attractive retirement benefits.
Review of Risks Associated with Compensation Plans
Based on an analysis conducted by management and reviewed by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee, we do not believe that compensation programs for employees are reasonably likely to have a material short or long term adverse effect on our operating results.
Use of Consultants
In 2014 and 2012, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee directly engaged the services of Blanchard Consulting Group, an independent compensation consulting firm, to assist with a total compensation review for the top threeCEO, President and CFO, and executive officers of the Corporation (CEO, President and CFO, and Bank President).Corporation. Blanchard Consulting Group does not perform any additional services for us or any members of senior management. In addition, Blanchard Consulting Group does not have any other personal or business relationships with any Board members or officers. During 2013, the Compensation and 2011, theHuman Resource Committee did not employ any services of outside compensation or benefit consultants to assist it in compensation-relatedcompensation related initiatives.
Elements of Compensation
Our executive compensation program has consisted primarily of base salary and benefits, annual performance incentives, benefits and perquisites, and participation in our retirement plans.
How Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives
Individual elements of our compensation objectives are structured to reward strong financial performance, continued service, and to incentivize our leaders to excel in the future. We continually review our compensation objectives to ensure that they are sufficient to attract and retain exceptional officers.
Why Each of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen and How We Determine Amounts for Each Element
Base Salaries, which include director fees for certain executive officers, are set to provide competitive levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with strong leadership skills. Each officer’s performance, current compensation, and responsibilities are considered by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee when establishing base salaries. We also believe it is best to pay sufficient base salary because we believe an over-reliance on equity incentive compensation could potentially skew incentives toward short-term maximization of shareholder value as opposed to building long-term shareholder

8


Table of Contents

value. Competitive base salary encourages management to operate in a safe and sound manner even when incentive goals may prove unattainable.
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee’s approach to determining the annual base salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in comparison with other comparable financial institutions. In prior years, the2014 and 2012, this Committee utilized both an independent

8

Table of Contents

compensation consultant, Blanchard Consulting Group, and a survey prepared by the Michigan Bankers Association of similar sized Michigan based financial institutions. The independent compensation consultant established a benchmark peer group of 1523 midwest financial institutions in non-urban areas with comparable average assets size ($900 million—1 billion—$22.4 billion), number of branch locations, return on average assets, (year-ended 2011 ROAA of .38% or greater), and nonperforming assets. The Michigan Bankers Association 20122014 compensation survey was based on the compensation information provided by these organizations for 2011.2013. Specific factors used to decide where an executive officer’s salary should be within the established range include the historical financial performance, financial performance outlook, years of service, and job performance. The Compensation and Human Resource Committee targeted total compensation for the CEO, the President & CFO, and Bank President to approximate the median of the rangeusing ranges obtained from the Michigan Bankers Association compensation survey as well as any ranges obtained from the independent compensation consultant. Compensation for other named executive officers was based on the ranges provided by the Michigan Bankers Association survey. The Michigan Bankers Association survey was utilized in 2013 as well.
Annual Performance Incentives are used to reward executive officers based on our overall financial performance. This element of the compensation program is included in the overall compensation in order to reward employees above and beyond their base salaries when our performance and profitability exceed established annual targets. The inclusion of this modest incentive encourages management to be creative and diligent in managing to achieve specific financial goals without incurring inordinate risks. Annual performance incentives paid in 20132014 were determined by reference to sevensix performance measures that related to services performed in 2012.2013. The maximum award that may be granted to each eligible employee equals 10% of the employee’s base salary (the “Maximum Award”).
The payment of 35% of the Maximum Award (“personal performance goals”) is based on the achievement of goals set for each individual. An analysis is conducted by the CEO. The CEO makes a recommendation to the Compensation and Human Resource Committee for the appropriate amount for each individual executive officer. TheThis Committee reviews, modifies if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the CEO. TheThis Committee also reviews the performance of the CEO. The Compensation and Human Resource Committee uses the following factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in determining annual cash bonus amounts to be paid:
Peer group financial performance compensationcompensation;
1 and 5 year shareholder returnsreturns;
Earnings per share and earnings per share growthgrowth;
Budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performanceperformance;
Community and industry involvementinvolvement;
Results of audit and regulatory examsexams; and
Other strategic goals as established by the BoardBoard.
Each of the executive officers who were eligible to participate in 20122013 accomplished their personal performance goals and were accordingly paid 35% of the 20122013 Maximum Award in 2013.2014.
The payment of the remaining 65% of the Maximum Award (“corporate performance goals”) was conditioned on the achievement of targets in the following six categories:
Earnings per share (weighted 40%).;
Net operating expenses to average assets (weighted 15%20%).;
Fully Taxable Equivalent (“FTE”) net interest margin, excluding loan fees (weighted 10%).;
Loan growth (weighted 10%);
In-market deposit growth (weighted 10%).
Loan growth (weighted 15%).; and
Exceeding peer group return on average assets (weighted 10%).

9


Table of Contents

The following chart provides the 20122013 target for each corporate performance goal, as well as the performance attained for each target.
2012 Targets 2012 Performance (1) Target % Obtained2013 Targets 2013 Performance (1) Target % Obtained
Target25.00% 50.00% 75.00% 100.00% 25.00% 50.00% 75.00% 100.00% 
Earning per share$1.50
 $1.53
 $1.55
 $1.57
 $1.59
 100%$1.57
 $1.60
 $1.62
 $1.64
 $1.63
 75%
Net operating expenses to average assets1.60% 1.57% 1.54% 1.51% 1.45% 100%1.64% 1.61% 1.58% 1.55% 1.62% 25%
FTE Net Interest Margin3.46% 3.48% 3.50% 3.52% 3.46% 25%3.33% 3.35% 3.37% 3.39% 3.28% %
In market deposit growth4.50% 5.00% 5.50% 6.00% 6.10% 100%4.50% 5.00% 5.50% 6.00% 7.07% 100%
Loan growth3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 1.46% %4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 5.50% 1.81% %
Exceeding peer group return on average assets1.32% 1.35% 1.39% 1.42% 1.37% 50%1.32% 1.35% 1.39% 1.42% 1.28% %
(1)Adjusted for incentive calculation measures.
Benefits and Perquisites.    Executive officers are eligible for all of the benefits made available to full-time employees (such as health insurance, group term life insurance and disability insurance) on the same basis as other full-time employees and are subject to the same sick leave and other employee policies.
We also provide our executive officers with certain additional perquisites, which we believe are appropriate in order to attract and retain the proper quality of talent for these positions and to recognize that similar executive perquisites are commonly offered by comparable financial institutions. We maintain a plan for qualified officers to provide death benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the life of each participant with the Bank as the sole owner and beneficiary of the policies. We believe that perquisites provided to our executive officers in 20132014 represented a reasonable percentage of each executive’s total compensation package and are consistent, in the aggregate, with perquisites provided to executive officers of comparable financial institutions. A description and the cost of these perquisites are included in footnote 1 in the “Summary Compensation Table” appearing on page 12, and in the table outlining the change in pension value on page 13, and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings tablethe “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table” appearing on page 13.14.
Retirement Plans.    Our retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing themselves with a financially secure retirement. The retirement plans include a 401(k) plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan, a frozen non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)(“ESOP”), and a retirement bonus plan.
We have a 401(k) plan, in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50%100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The plan was amended in 2013 to provide a matching safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees equal to 100% of the first 5.0% of an employee's compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor matching contributions.
For 2012, and 2011, we made a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees were 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and were 0% vested through their first two years of employment and were 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching contributions.
Our defined benefit pension plan was curtailed effective March 1, 2007 and the current participants’ accrued benefits were frozen as of that date. Participation in the plan was limited to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.
Our non-leveraged ESOP was frozen effective December 31, 2006 to new participants. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and approved by the Board.
The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. Benefit amounts are determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board.

10


Table of Contents

Compensation and Human Resource Committee Report
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Corporation filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Corporation specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee, which includes all of the independent directors of the Board, has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K with management, and based on such review and discussion, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Board:
David J. Maness, Chairperson
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes
G. Charles Hubscher
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
Joseph LaFramboise
W. Joseph Manifold
W. Michael McGuire
Sarah R. Opperman


11


Table of Contents

Executive Officers
Executive officers are compensated in accordance with their employment with the applicable entity. The following table shows information on compensation earned in each of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2013,2014, for the CEO, the retired CEO, the CFO, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal positionYear Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings
($)
 All other compensation
($)(1)
 Total
($)
Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings
($)
 All other compensation
($)(1)
 Total
($)
Richard J. Barz2013 $406,522
 $28,358
 $(2,860) $35,771
 $467,791
CEO (retired)2012 396,325
 25,106
 123,578
 35,615
 580,624
Isabella Bank Corporation2011 375,225
 26,535
 181,143
 37,627
 620,530
          
Jae A. Evans (2)2013 $176,379
 $13,320
 $
 $30,832
 $220,531
2014 $302,472
 $10,698
 $65,000
 $36,703
 $414,873
CEO2012 

 

 

 

 

2013 176,379
 13,320
 
 30,832
 220,531
Isabella Bank Corporation2011 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                    
Dennis P. Angner2013 $354,522
 $25,121
 $9,918
 $29,775
 $419,336
2014 $365,542
 $19,809
 $259,016
 $26,582
 $670,949
President and CFO2012 357,335
 23,628
 131,266
 28,208
 540,437
2013 354,522
 25,121
 9,918
 29,775
 419,336
Isabella Bank Corporation2011 355,625
 26,100
 163,672
 28,542
 573,939
2012 357,335
 23,628
 131,266
 28,208
 540,437
                    
Steven D. Pung2013 $227,675
 $6,003
 $6,629
 $29,589
 $269,896
2014 $262,953
 $13,814
 $153,870
 $34,673
 $465,310
President2012 195,128
 13,333
 67,361
 30,111
 305,933
2013 227,675
 6,003
 6,629
 29,589
 269,896
Isabella Bank2011 167,362
 12,719
 98,915
 27,732
 306,728
2012 195,128
 13,333
 67,361
 30,111
 305,933
                    
Jerome E. Schwind (2)2013 $152,017
 $10,326
 $(9,000) $25,474
 $178,817
2014 $219,176
 $9,316
 $16,000
 $28,766
 $273,258
Executive Vice President and COO2012 

 

 

 

 

2013 152,017
 10,326
 (9,000) 25,474
 178,817
Isabella Bank2011 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                    
David J. Reetz2013 $133,537
 $10,598
 $(9,778) $16,604
 $150,961
2014 $155,088
 $8,981
 $90,237
 $17,639
 $271,945
Sr. Vice President and CLO2012 129,397
 9,708
 45,361
 17,138
 201,604
2013 133,537
 10,598
 (9,778) 16,604
 150,961
Isabella Bank2011 125,640
 8,612
 61,944
 15,077
 211,273
2012 129,397
 9,708
 45,361
 17,138
 201,604
(1)For all named executives all other compensation includes 401(k) matching contributions. For Richard J. Barz, Jae A. Evans, Steven D. Pung, and David J. Reetz this also includes club dues and auto allowance. For Dennis P. Angner and Jerome E. Schwind, this also includes auto allowance.
(2)Not a named executive officer prior to 2013.
Executive officer salary includes compensation voluntarily deferred under our 401(k) plan. Director and advisory board fees are also included and are displayed in the following table for each the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2013:2014:
Director and advisory board fees ($)Director and advisory board fees ($)
Name and principal position2013 2012 20112014
2013
2012
Richard J. Barz$46,525
 $51,325
 $50,225
Jae A. Evans675
 
 
$27,300
 $675
 
Dennis P. Angner46,525
 51,325
 49,625
45,700
 46,525
 51,325
Steven D. Pung12,675
 900
 900
24,100
 12,675
 900
Jerome E. Schwind1,200
 
 

 1,200
 
David J. ReetzN/A
 N/A
 N/A

 
 

12


Table of Contents

The change in pension value and non-qualifiednonqualified deferred compensation earnings, listed in the summary compensation table, represents the aggregate non-cash change in the actuarial present value of the noted executive’s accumulated benefit under the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan and also includes the non-cash change in the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement

12


Bonus Plan. The following table provides the change in values for the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2013:2014:
Pension plan ($) Retirement plan ($)Pension plan ($) Retirement plan ($)
Name and principal position2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
Richard J. Barz$(47,000) $83,000
 $143,000
 $44,140
 $40,578
 $38,143
Jae A. EvansN/A
 

 

 N/A
 

 


 
 

 65,000
 
 

Dennis P. Angner(70,000) 64,000
 109,000
 79,918
 67,266
 54,672
173,000
 (70,000) 64,000
 86,016
 79,918
 67,266
Steven D. Pung(29,000) 44,000
 77,000
 35,629
 23,361
 21,915
126,000
 (29,000) 44,000
 27,870
 35,629
 23,361
Jerome E. Schwind(9,000) 
 
 N/A
 

 

16,000
 (9,000) 
 
 
 

David J. Reetz(32,000) 25,000
 43,000
 22,222
 20,361
 18,944
66,000
 (32,000) 25,000
 24,237
 22,222
 20,361
 
Pension Benefits
The following table indicates the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20132014 for each named executive officer in the summary compensation table.
NamePlan name Number of years of vesting service as of
01/01/13 (#)
 Present value of accumulated benefit
($)
 Payments during last fiscal yearPlan name Number of years of vesting service as of
01/01/14
 Present value of accumulated benefit
($)
 Payments during last fiscal year
Richard J. BarzIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 42 $941,000
 $

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan 42 393,792
 
Jae A. EvansIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan N/A 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  
 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 65,000
 
Dennis P. AngnerIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 30 485,000
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 31 658,000
 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan 30 477,389
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 563,405
 
Steven D. PungIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 35 476,000
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 36 602,000
 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan 35 226,535
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 254,405
 
Jerome E. SchwindIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 15 32,000
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 16 48,000
 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 
 
David J. ReetzIsabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 27 155,000
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan 28 221,000
 

Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan 27 151,905
 
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan N/A 176,142
 
Defined benefit pension plan.    We sponsor the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. The curtailment, which was effective March 1, 2007, froze the current participant’s accrued benefits as of that date and limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006. Due to the curtailment of the plan, the number of years of credited service was frozen. As such, the years of credited service for the plan may differ from the participant’s actual years of service.
Annual contributions are made to the plan as required by accepted actuarial principles, applicable federal tax laws, and to pay expenses related to operating and maintaining the plan. The amount of contributions on behalf of any one participant cannot be separately or individually computed.
Pension plan benefits are based on years of service and the employees’ five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service, through December 31, 2006.
A participant may earn a benefit for up to 35 years of accredited service. Earned benefits are 100% vested after five years of service. Benefit payments normally start when a participant reaches age 65. A participant with more than five years of service may elect to take early retirement benefits anytime after reaching age 55. Benefits payable under early retirement are reduced actuarially for each month prior to age 65 in which benefits begin.
Dennis P. Angner and Steven D. Pung are eligible for early retirement under the plan. Under the provisions of the plan, participants are eligible for early retirement after reaching the age of 55 with at least 5 years of service. The early retirement benefit amount is the accrued benefit payable at normal retirement date reduced by 5/9% for each of the first 60 months and 5/18% for each of the next 60 months that the benefit commencement date precedes the normal retirement date.

13



Retirement bonus plan.    We sponsor the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. This nonqualified plan is intended to provide eligible employees with additional retirement benefits. To be eligible, the employee needed to be an employee on January 1, 2007, and be a participant in our frozen Executive Supplemental Income Agreement. Participants must also be an officer with at least 10 years of service as of December 31, 2006. We have sole and exclusive discretion to add new participants to the plan by authorizing such participation pursuant to action of the Board.
An initial amount was credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts have been credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the annual allocation shall be determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted at our sole and exclusive discretion, as set forth in the plan.
Dennis P. Angner and Steven D. Pung are eligible for early retirement under the plan. Under the provisions of the plan, participants are eligible for early retirement upon attaining 55 years of age. There is no difference between the calculation of benefits payable upon early retirement and normal retirement.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
NameExecutive contributions in 2013 
 ($)
 Aggregate earnings in 2013 
 ($)
 Aggregate 
 balance at December 31, 2013 
 ($)
Executive contributions in 2014 
($)
 Aggregate earnings in 2014 
($)
 Aggregate 
balance at December 31, 2014 
($)
Richard J. Barz$24,800
 $8,224
 $247,250
Jae A. Evans675
 560
 16,536
13,764
 974
 29,811
Dennis P. Angner29,400
 10,797
 323,482
27,564
 12,940
 344,246
Steven D. Pung12,675
 604
 22,273
24,100
 1,439
 45,651
Jerome E. Schwind1,200
 175
 5,225

 198
 5,120
David J. ReetzN/A
 N/A
 N/A

 
 
Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors ("Directors Plan"), named executive officers who serve as directors, are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock and may invest up to 100% of their earned fees based on their annual election. These amounts are reflected in the above table. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP Plan"). Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of our common stock based on the fair market value of shares at that time. Shares credited to a participant’s account are eligible for stock and cash dividends as paid. DRIP Plan shares are purchased on a monthly basis pursuant to the DRIP Plan.
Distribution of deferred fees from the Directors Plan occurs when the participant retires from the Board, attains age 70, or upon the occurrence of certain other events. Distributions must take the form of shares of our common stock. Any common stock issued under deferred fees from the Directors Plan will be considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Common stock purchased through the DRIP Plan are not considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The estimated amounts payable to each named executive officer upon severance from employment, retirement, termination upon death or disability or termination following a change in control are described below. For all termination scenarios, the amounts assume such termination took place as of December 31, 2013.2014.
Any Severance of Employment
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he or she is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amounts include:
Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension Plan.
Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.
Amounts deferred in the Directors Plan.
Unused vacation pay.
Retirement
In the event of the retirement of an executive officer, the officer would receive the benefits identified above. As of December 31, 2013, the named executive officers listed had no unused vacation days.

14



Death or Disability
In the event of death or disability of an executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed above, the executive officer will also receive payments under our life insurance plan or under our disability plan as appropriate.
In addition to potential payments upon termination available to all employees, the estates for the executive officers listed below would receive the following payments upon death:
NameWhile an Active Employee Subsequent to RetirementWhile an Active Employee Subsequent to Retirement
Richard J. BarzN/A
 $360,000
Jae A. Evans$351,400
 175,700
$530,000
 $265,000
Dennis P. Angner616,000
 308,000
616,000
 308,000
Steven D. Pung430,000
 215,000
460,000
 230,000
Jerome E. Schwind301,600
 150,800
422,000
 211,000
David J. Reetz267,000
 133,500
298,000
 149,000
Change in Control
We currently do not have a change in control agreement with any of the executive officers; provided, however, pursuant to the Retirement Bonus Plan each participant would become 100% vested in their benefit under the plan if, following a change in control, they voluntarily terminate employment or are terminated without just cause.
Director Compensation
The following table summarizes the Compensationcompensation of each non-employee director who served on the Board during 2013.2014.
NameFees paid in cash
($)
 Fees deferred under Directors Plan
($)
 Total fees earned
($)
Fees paid in cash
($)(1)
 Fees deferred under Directors Plan
($)(1)
 Total fees earned
($)
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes$
 $28,575
 $28,575
$675
 $29,925
 $30,600
Sandra L. Caul30,950
 
 30,950
Richard J. Barz29,200
 
 29,200
G. Charles Hubscher
 36,350
 36,350
675
 36,025
 36,700
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
 39,025
 39,025
675
 34,025
 34,700
Joseph LaFramboise15,120
 21,905
 37,025
16,155
 20,945
 37,100
Wilson C. Lauer18,263
 6,087
 24,350
David J. Maness
 50,550
 50,550
26,286
 25,614
 51,900
W. Joseph Manifold
 34,550
 34,550
675
 34,525
 35,200
W. Michael McGuire27,862
 10,963
 38,825
25,963
 10,337
 36,300
Sarah R. Opperman
 29,050
 29,050
31,000
 
 31,000
(1)Directors electing to receive all fees in cash, resulting in no contributions to the Directors Plan, invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock under the DRIP Plan as described in our Directors Plan on page 14.
We paid $1,350 per board meeting plus a retainer of $7,500 to each member during 2013.2014. Members of the Audit Committee were paid $600 per audit committeeAudit Committee meeting attended. Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were paid $300 per meeting attended. Members of the Information Technology Committee were paid $225 per meeting attended plus a retainer of $1,000. The chairperson of the Board is paid a retainer of $33,000, and the chairperson for the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $4,000.$4,000, and the vice chairperson for the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $2,000.
Under the Directors Plan, upon a participant’s attainment of age 70, retirement from the Board, or the occurrence of certain other events, they are eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind distribution of all of the stock that is then credited to their account. The plan does not allow for cash settlement. Stock issued under the Directors Plan is restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
We established a Rabbi Trust to fund the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which we may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although we may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust for any purpose other than meeting its obligations under the Directors Plan, the assets of the Rabbi Trust remain subject to the claims of our creditors. We may contribute cash or common stock to the Rabbi Trust from time to time-to-

15



time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust will use any cash that we may contribute to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market through our brokerage services department.market.

15


We transferred $409,163$338,649 to the Rabbi Trust in 2013,2014, which held 12,76113,934 shares of our common stock for settlement as of December 31, 2013.2014. As of December 31, 2013,2014, there were 172,550173,435 shares of stock credited to participants’ accounts, which credits are unfunded as of such date to the extent that they are in excess of the stock and cash that has been credited to the Rabbi Trust. All amounts are unsecured claims against our general assets. The net cost of this benefit was $147,480$154,107 in 2013.2014.
The following table displays the cumulative number of equity shares credited to the accounts of current directors pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan as of March 17, 2014:12, 2015:
Name# of shares of stock credited
Dennis P. Angner13,56315,300
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes7,3248,922
Richard J. Barz
Jae A. Evans6931,325
G. Charles Hubscher10,92312,929
Thomas L. Kleinhardt17,53419,708
Joseph LaFramboise7,6188,832
David J. Maness21,68223,647
W. Joseph Manifold13,13915,165
W. Michael McGuire7,2017,934
Sarah R. Opperman1,8601,932
Compensation and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
In 2013,2014, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee members were directors Barnes, Caul, Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Lauer, Maness, Manifold, McGuire and Opperman. No executive officer of the Corporation serves on any board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that compensates any member of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee.
Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management
Certain directors and officers and members of their families were loan customers of the Bank, or have been directors or officers of corporations, members or managers of limited liability companies, or partners of partnerships which have had transactions with the Bank. In our opinion, all such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and were substantially on the same terms, including collateral and interest rates, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with customers not related to the Bank. These transactions do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Total loans to these customers were approximately $4,178,000$3,822,000 as of December 31, 2013.2014. We address transactions with related parties in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy. Conflicts of interest are prohibited, except under board approved guidelines.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 17, 201412, 2015 as to the common stock of the Corporation owned of record or beneficially by any person who is known to the Corporation to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the common stock of the Corporation.
Name and Address of OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) Percent of ClassAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) Percent of Class
McGuirk Investments413,007
 5.36%
McGuirk Investments LLC412,557
 5.29%
P.O. Box 222
 

 
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48804-0222
 

 
(1)Beneficial ownership is defined by rules of the SEC and includes shares that the person has or shares voting or investment power over and shares that the person has a right to acquire within 60 days from March 17, 2014.12, 2015.

16



The following table sets forth certain information as of March 17, 201412, 2015 as to our common stock owned beneficially by each director and director nominee, by each named executive officer, and by all directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.
Name of OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) Percent of ClassAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) Percent of Class
Dennis P. Angner33,648
 0.43%36,186
 0.46%
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes13,575
 0.17%15,415
 0.19%
Richard J. Barz30,697
 0.39%31,490
 0.40%
Jae A. Evans9,192
 0.12%10,202
 0.13%
G. Charles Hubscher45,603
 0.58%168,716
 2.13%
Thomas L. Kleinhardt66,719
 0.85%69,422
 0.88%
Joseph LaFramboise8,821
 0.11%10,074
 0.13%
David J. Maness23,636
 0.30%26,692
 0.34%
W. Joseph Manifold17,989
 0.23%20,040
 0.25%
W. Michael McGuire78,131
 1.00%78,864
 1.00%
Sarah R. Opperman2,973
 0.04%4,998
 0.06%
Steven D. Pung21,002
 0.27%23,066
 0.29%
David J. Reetz9,343
 0.12%9,503
 0.12%
Jerome E. Schwind1,163
 0.01%1,440
 0.02%
All Directors, nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (14) persons362,492
 4.62%506,108
 6.40%
(1)
Beneficial ownership is defined by rules of the SEC and includes shares that the person has or shares voting or investment power over and shares that the person has a right to acquire within 60 days from March 17, 2014.12, 2015. Totals for directors include shares of stock credited under the Directors Plan as of March 17, 201412, 2015 as disclosed in the table on page 16 above. Totals for named executive officers Steven D. Pung and Jerome E. Schwind include shares of stock credited under the Directors Plan as of March 17, 201412, 2015 as follows:  Mr. Pung, 9342,029 shares; and Mr. Schwind, 219228 shares. Participants in the Directors Plan have a right to acquire shares credited to their accounts upon a distributable event. A description of the Directors Plan under which these shares of stock were issued is set forth above in "Director Compensation."
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson LLC as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2014.2015.
A representative of Rehmann Robson LLC is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders and to make any comments Rehmann Robson LLC believes are appropriate.
Fees for Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson LLC
The following table shows the aggregate fees billed by Rehmann Robson LLC for the audit and other services provided for:

2013 20122014 2013
Audit fees$271,380
 $263,180
$278,178
 $271,380
Audit related fees29,425
 28,250
18,760
 29,425
Tax fees27,095
 25,950
24,210
 27,095
Total$327,900
 $317,380
$321,148
 $327,900
The audit fees were for performing the integrated audit of our consolidated annual financial statements and the internal control attestation report related to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, review of interim quarterly financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by Rehmann Robson LLC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

17



The audit related fees are typically for various discussions related to the adoption and interpretation of new accounting pronouncements. During 2013,2014, this includes fees for procedures related to nonrecurring regulatory filings. Also included are fees for auditing of our employee benefit plans.
The tax fees were for the preparation of our state and federal tax returns and for consultation on various tax matters.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided by Rehmann Robson LLC, other than the audit fees, are compatible with maintaining Rehmann Robson LLC’s independence and believes that the other services provided are compatible.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
All audit and non-audit services over $5,000 to be performed by Rehmann Robson LLC must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services. As permitted by the SEC’sSEC rules, the Audit Committee has authorized its chairperson to pre-approve audit, audit-related, tax and non-audit services, provided that such approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.
As early as practicable in each calendar year, the independent auditor provides to the Audit Committee a schedule of the audit and other services that the independent auditor expects to provide or may provide during the next twelve months. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed services, the proposed fees, timing, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline the proposed services. Upon approval, this schedule will serve as the budget for fees by specific activity or service for the next twelve months.
A schedule of additional services proposed to be provided by the independent auditor, or proposed revisions to services already approved, along with associated proposed fees, may be presented to the Audit Committee for their consideration and approval at any time. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed service, the proposed fee, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline authorization for each proposed new service.
Applicable SEC rules and regulations permit waiver of the pre-approval requirements for services other than audit, review or attest services if certain conditions are met. Out of the services characterized above as audit-related, tax and professional services, none were billed pursuant to these provisions in 20132014 and 20122013 without pre-approval.
Shareholder Proposals
Any proposals which you intend to present at the next annual meetingAnnual Meeting must be received before December 1, 2014November 27, 2015 to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statementProxy Statement and proxy for that meeting. Proposals should be made in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 14a-8.
Directors’ Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Our directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders.Annual Meeting. At the 2013 annual meeting,2014 Annual Meeting, all directors were in attendance.attendance, with the exception of Dr. Barnes.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and certain officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. These officers, directors, and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of these reports.
To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished, during the year ended December 31, 20132014 all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied, with respect to the applicable officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners with the exception of executive officers Steven D. Pungthe following: Director Barz filed one late report for two reportable transactions, Director Hubscher filed two late reports for one reportable transaction, and David J. Reetz. Executive officers Pung and ReetzDirector Opperman filed their Form 3sone late on January 10, 2014.report for two reportable transactions.
Other Matters
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and other employees may solicit proxies by telephone or in person, without compensation other than their regular compensation.

18



As to Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting
We do not intend to bring any other business before the meeting for action. However, if any other business should be presented for action, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment on such business.
By order of the Board of Directors

Debra Campbell, Secretary



19



Isabella Bank Corporation
Financial Information Index
Page Description
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


20



Forward Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and isare included in this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the FRB, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, fluctuation in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning Isabella Bank Corporation and itsour business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our filings with the SEC.
The acronyms and abbreviations identified below may be used throughout this report,Annual Report on Form 10-K or in our other filings. You may find it helpful to refer back to this page while reading this report.
AFS: Available-for-sale GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
ALLL: Allowance for loan and lease losses IFRS: International Financial Reporting StandardsGLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) IRR: Interest rate riskIFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards
ASC: FASB Accounting Standards CodificationIRR: Interest rate risk
ASU: FASB Accounting Standards Update JOBS Act: Jumpstart our Business Startups Act
ASU: FASB Accounting Standards UpdateATM: Automated Teller Machine LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
ATM: Automated Teller MachineMoody’s: Moody’s Investors Service, Inc
BHC Act: Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 N/A: Not applicable
CFPB: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau N/M: Not meaningful
CIK: Central Index Key NASDAQ: NASDAQ Stock Market Index
CRA: Community Reinvestment Act NASDAQ Banks: NASDAQ Bank Stock Index
DIF: Deposit Insurance Fund NAV: Net asset value
DIFS: Department of Insurance and Financial Services NOW: Negotiable order of withdrawal
Directors Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors NSF: Non-sufficient funds
Dividend Reinvestment Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan OCI: Other comprehensive income (loss)
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 OMSRs:OMSR: Originated mortgage servicing rights
ESOP: Employee stock ownership plan OREO: Other real estate owned
Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OTC: Over-the-CounterOTTI: Other-than-temporary impairment
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board OTTI: Other-than-temporary impairmentPBO: Projected benefit obligation
FDI Act: Federal Deposit Insurance Act PBO: Projected benefit obligation
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationPCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
FFIEC:FDIC: Federal Financial Institutions Examinations CouncilDeposit Insurance Corporation Rabbi Trust: A trust established to fund the Directors Plan
Fitch: Fitch RatingsFFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council SEC: U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
FRB: Federal Reserve Bank SOX: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank S&P: Standard & Poor'sTDR: Troubled debt restructuring
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation TDR: Troubled debt restructuringXBRL: eXtensible Business Reporting Language
FTE: Fully taxable equivalent XBRL: eXtensible Business Reporting Language
GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles 


21



Common Stock and Dividend Information
Our authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,776,274 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014. As of that date, there were 3,056 shareholders of record.
Our common stock is traded in the over the counter market.  The common stock is quoted on the OTCQBOTCQX market tier of the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s ("OTC Markets") electronic quotation system (www.otcmarkets.com) under the symbol “ISBA”.  Other trades in the common stock occur in privately negotiated transactions from time-to-time of which we may have little or no information.
Our authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,723,023 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013. As of that date, there were 3,080 shareholders of record.
We have reviewed the information available as to the range of reported high and low bid quotations, including high and low bid information as reported by OTC Markets. The following table sets forth our compilation of that information for the periods indicated. Price information obtained from OTC Markets reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The following compiled data is provided for information purposes only and should not be viewed as indicative of the actual or market value of our common stock.
Number of
Shares
 Sale PriceNumber of
Shares
 Sale Price
Low High
2014     
First Quarter79,719
 $22.25
 $23.94
Second Quarter72,142
 22.44
 23.50
Third Quarter94,422
 21.73
 24.00
Fourth Quarter67,771
 22.10
 23.99
Number of
Shares
 Low High314,054
    
2013        
First Quarter54,741
 $21.79
 $25.10
54,741
 $21.55
 $25.10
Second Quarter65,865
 24.78
 26.00
65,865
 24.65
 26.00
Third Quarter105,540
 23.49
 25.50
105,540
 23.40
 25.50
Fourth Quarter116,052
 21.20
 24.84
116,052
 21.12
 24.84
342,198
    342,198
    
2012     
First Quarter64,873
 $22.15
 $24.25
Second Quarter63,656
 23.45
 24.98
Third Quarter97,706
 22.50
 24.90
Fourth Quarter87,966
 21.60
 23.45
314,201
    
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the following quarters:
Per SharePer Share
2013 20122014 2013
First Quarter$0.21
 $0.20
$0.22
 $0.21
Second Quarter0.21
 0.20
0.22
 0.21
Third Quarter0.21
 0.20
0.22
 0.21
Fourth Quarter0.21
 0.20
0.23
 0.21
Total$0.84
 $0.80
$0.89
 $0.84
We have adopted and publicly announced a common stock repurchase plan. The plan was last amended on October 23, 2013,22, 2014, to allow for the repurchase of an additional 150,000 shares of common stock. These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to the status of authorized, but unissued shares.

22



The following table provides information for the unaudited three month period ended December 31, 2013,2014, with respect to the common stock repurchase plan:
Shares Repurchased Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or ProgramsShares Repurchased Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Number Average Price
Per Share
 Number Average Price
Per Share
 
Balance, September 30      11,441
      26,716
October 1 - 234,400
 $23.86
 4,400
 7,041
October 1 - 223,600
 $23.61
 3,600
 23,116
Additional Authorization (150,000 shares)

 

 

 157,041


 

 

 173,116
October 24 - 314,950
 23.84
 4,950
 152,091
October 23 - 312,707
 23.27
 2,707
 170,409
November 1 - 307,022
 23.50
 7,022
 145,069
7,257
 22.87
 7,257
 163,152
December 1 - 317,673
 22.42
 7,673
 137,396
11,386
 22.66
 11,386
 151,766
Balance, December 3124,045
 $23.29
 24,045
 137,396
24,950
 $22.93
 24,950
 151,766
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans appears under Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.Matters.
Stock Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on (1) NASDAQ, which is comprised of all United States common shares traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Banks, which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph assumes the value of an investment in ISBAthe Corporation's common stock and each index was $100 at December 31, 20082009 and all dividends are reinvested.
 
Year ISBA NASDAQ NASDAQ
Banks
 ISBA NASDAQ NASDAQ
Banks
12/31/2008$100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/200912/31/200977.10
 145.05
 83.58
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/201012/31/201073.40
 171.14
 95.29
 95.20
 117.99
 114.01
12/31/201112/31/2011104.50
 169.83
 85.32
 135.70
 117.08
 102.08
12/31/201212/31/201299.30
 199.89
 101.15
 128.80
 137.80
 121.02
12/31/201312/31/2013112.60
 279.62
 142.93
 146.20
 192.78
 171.02
12/31/2014 143.30
 221.15
 179.24

23



SummaryResults of Selected Financial Data
(DollarsOperations (Dollars in thousands except per share amountsamounts)
)The following table outlines the results of operations and provides certain key performance measures as of, and for the years ended, December 31:
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
INCOME STATEMENT DATA                  
Interest income$54,076
 $56,401
 $57,905
 $57,217
 $58,105
$53,951
 $54,076
 $56,401
 $57,905
 $57,217
Interest expense11,021
 13,423
 16,203
 17,204
 19,839
9,970
 11,021
 13,423
 16,203
 17,204
Net interest income43,055
 42,978
 41,702
 40,013
 38,266
43,981
 43,055
 42,978
 41,702
 40,013
Provision for loan losses1,111
 2,300
 3,826
 4,857
 6,093
(668) 1,111
 2,300
 3,826
 4,857
Noninterest income10,175
 11,530
 8,218
 9,300
 10,156
9,325
 10,175
 11,530
 8,218
 9,300
Noninterest expenses37,413
 37,639
 34,530
 33,807
 33,683
37,906
 37,413
 37,639
 34,530
 33,807
Federal income tax expense2,196
 2,363
 1,354
 1,604
 846
2,344
 2,196
 2,363
 1,354
 1,604
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
 $9,045
 $7,800
Net Income$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
 $9,045
PER SHARE                  
Basic earnings$1.63
 $1.61
 $1.35
 $1.20
 $1.04
$1.77
 $1.63
 $1.61
 $1.35
 $1.20
Diluted earnings1.59
 1.56
 1.31
 1.17
 1.01
$1.74
 $1.59
 $1.56
 $1.31
 $1.17
Dividends0.84
 0.80
 0.76
 0.72
 0.70
$0.89
 $0.84
 $0.80
 $0.76
 $0.72
Market value*23.85
 21.75
 23.70
 17.30
 18.95
Tangible book value*15.62
 14.72
 13.90
 13.22
 12.67
$16.59
 $15.62
 $14.72
 $13.90
 $13.22
BALANCE SHEET DATA         
At end of period         
Loans$808,037
 $772,753
 $750,291
 $735,304
 $723,316
Total assets1,493,137
 1,430,639
 1,337,925
 1,225,810
 1,143,944
Deposits1,043,766
 1,017,667
 958,164
 877,339
 802,652
Shareholders' equity160,609
 164,489
 154,783
 145,161
 140,803
Average balance         
Loans$790,132
 $754,304
 $743,441
 $725,534
 $725,299
Total assets1,448,440
 1,381,083
 1,287,195
 1,182,930
 1,127,634
Deposits1,025,088
 984,927
 927,186
 840,392
 786,714
Shareholders’ equity163,010
 160,682
 151,379
 145,304
 137,910
Quoted market value         
High$24.00
 $26.00
 $24.98
 $24.45
 $19.00
Low$21.73
 $21.12
 $21.75
 $17.10
 $15.75
Close*$22.50
 $23.85
 $21.75
 $23.70
 $17.30
Common shares outstanding*7,776,274
 7,723,023
 7,671,846
 7,589,226
 7,550,074
PERFORMANCE RATIOS                  
Return on average total assets0.86% 0.88% 0.79% 0.76% 0.69%0.90% 0.86% 0.88% 0.79% 0.76%
Return on average shareholders' equity7.67% 7.60% 6.74% 6.22% 5.66%8.06% 7.67% 7.60% 6.74% 6.22%
Return on average tangible equity10.71% 11.41% 10.30% 9.51% 8.53%
Return on average tangible shareholders' equity10.80% 10.71% 11.41% 10.30% 9.51%
Net interest margin yield (FTE)3.50% 3.70% 3.87% 4.04% 4.06%3.45% 3.50% 3.70% 3.87% 4.04%
Loan to deposit*77.42% 75.93% 78.31% 83.81% 90.12%
Nonperforming loans to total loans*0.42% 1.00% 0.95% 0.83% 1.28%
Nonperforming assets to total assets*0.32% 0.68% 0.67% 0.67% 0.91%
ALLL to nonperforming loans*339.63% 154.39% 173.10% 202.97% 139.71%
CAPITAL RATIOS         
Shareholders' equity to assets*10.76% 11.50% 11.57% 11.84% 12.31%
Tier 1 capital to average assets*8.46% 8.29% 8.18% 8.24% 8.60%
Tier 1 risk-based capital*13.67% 13.23% 12.92% 12.44% 12.80%
Total risk-based capital*14.92% 14.48% 14.17% 13.69% 14.06%
BALANCE SHEET DATA*         
Gross loans$833,582
 $808,037
 $772,753
 $750,291
 $735,304
AFS securities$567,534
 $512,062
 $504,010
 $425,120
 $330,724
Total assets$1,549,543
 $1,493,137
 $1,430,639
 $1,337,925
 $1,225,810
Deposits$1,074,484
 $1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $958,164
 $877,339
Borrowed funds$289,709
 $279,326
 $241,001
 $216,136
 $194,917
Shareholders' equity$174,594
 $160,609
 $164,489
 $154,783
 $145,161
Gross loans to deposits77.58% 77.42% 75.93% 78.31% 83.81%
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT*         
Loans sold with servicing retained$288,639
 $293,665
 $303,425
 $302,636
 $312,252
Assets managed by our Investment and Trust Services Department$383,878
 $351,420
 $319,301
 $297,393
 $307,983
Total assets under management$2,222,060
 $2,138,222
 $2,053,365
 $1,937,954
 $1,846,045
ASSET QUALITY*         
Nonperforming loans to gross loans0.50% 0.42% 1.00% 0.95% 0.83%
Nonperforming assets to total assets0.33% 0.32% 0.68% 0.67% 0.67%
ALLL to gross loans1.21% 1.42% 1.54% 1.65% 1.68%
CAPITAL RATIOS*         
Shareholders' equity to assets11.27% 10.76% 11.50% 11.57% 11.84%
Tier 1 capital to average assets8.59% 8.46% 8.29% 8.18% 8.24%
Tier 1 risk-based capital14.08% 13.67% 13.23% 12.92% 12.44%
Total risk-based capital15.18% 14.92% 14.48% 14.17% 13.69%
* At end of year


24



The following table outlines our interim results of operations and key performance measures as of, and for the unaudited periods ended:

Quarter to Date
 December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
 September 30
2013
 June 30
2013
 March 31
2013
Total interest income$13,713
 $13,483
 $13,391
 $13,364
 $13,603
 $13,505
 $13,440
 $13,528
Total interest expense2,504
 2,498
 2,468
 2,500
 2,683
 2,736
 2,781
 2,821
Net interest income11,209
 10,985
 10,923
 10,864
 10,920
 10,769
 10,659
 10,707
Provision for loan losses(64) (162) (200) (242) 245
 351
 215
 300
Noninterest income2,426
 2,216
 2,434
 2,249
 2,130
 2,862
 2,736
 2,447
Noninterest expenses9,606
 9,514
 9,300
 9,486
 9,578
 9,320
 9,324
 9,191
Federal income tax expense648
 444
 692
 560
 303
 674
 643
 576
Net income$3,445
 $3,405
 $3,565
 $3,309
 $2,924
 $3,286
 $3,213
 $3,087
PER SHARE               
Basic earnings$0.44
 $0.44
 $0.46
 $0.43
 $0.38
 $0.43
 $0.42
 $0.40
Diluted earnings0.44
 0.43
 0.45
 0.42
 0.37
 0.42
 0.41
 0.39
Dividends0.23
 0.22
 0.22
 0.22
 0.21
 0.21
 0.21
 0.21
Quoted Market value*22.50
 23.60
 22.95
 23.00
 23.85
 24.85
 24.75
 25.00
Tangible book value*16.59
 16.33
 16.08
 15.82
 15.62
 15.43
 15.19
 14.95
 Quarter to Date
 December 31
2013
 September 30
2013
 June 30
2013
 March 31
2013
 December 31
2012
 September 30
2012
 June 30
2012
 March 31
2012
Total interest income$13,603
 $13,505
 $13,440
 $13,528
 $13,845
 $14,164
 $14,188
 $14,204
Total interest expense2,683
 2,736
 2,781
 2,821
 3,051
 3,239
 3,429
 3,704
Net interest income10,920
 10,769
 10,659
 10,707
 10,794
 10,925
 10,759
 10,500
Provision for loan losses245
 351
 215
 300
 1,200
 200
 439
 461
Noninterest income2,130
 2,862
 2,736
 2,447
 2,686
 2,759
 2,544
 3,541
Noninterest expenses9,578
 9,320
 9,324
 9,191
 9,750
 9,128
 9,188
 9,573
Federal income tax expense303
 674
 643
 576
 19
 899
 672
 773
Net income$2,924
 $3,286
 $3,213
 $3,087
 $2,511
 $3,457
 $3,004
 $3,234
PER SHARE               
Basic earnings$0.38
 $0.43
 $0.42
 $0.40
 $0.33
 $0.45
 $0.40
 $0.43
Diluted earnings0.37
 0.42
 0.41
 0.39
 0.32
 0.44
 0.39
 0.41
Dividends0.21
 0.21
 0.21
 0.21
 0.20
 0.20
 0.20
 0.20
Market value*23.85
 24.85
 24.75
 25.00
 21.75
 22.50
 24.85
 24.00
Tangible book value*15.62
 15.43
 15.19
 14.95
 14.72
 14.65
 14.37
 14.15
* At end of period


25



Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)amounts)
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations. This discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of the consolidated financial statements and statistical data included elsewhere in ourthis Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Executive Summary
DuringWe reported record net income of $13,724 and earnings per common share of $1.77 for the year ended 2013, we earned a record $12,510, which was an increase of $304 from 2012December 31, 2014. We enjoyed loan growthOur continued strong earnings have primarily been the result of $35,284 and ana continued improvement in credit quality indicators. AsThese improvements resulted in a decline in the level of the ALLL in both amount and as a percentage of gross loans, resulting in a reversal of provision for loan losses of $668 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net loan charge-offs during 2014 were $732 as compared to $1,547 in 2013, our which is a 52.68% decline. Additionally, we continue to see reductions in loans classified as less than satisfactory.
During the year, total assets were $1.49 billion,grew by 3.78% to $1,549,543, and assets under management -increased to $2,222,060 which includedincludes loans sold and serviced, and assets managed by our Investment and Trust Services Department of $645.09 million - were $2.14 billion,$672,517. We enjoyed total loan growth of $25,545 which was driven by commercial and agricultural loan growth of $51,989. This was partially offset by declines in both residential real estate and consumer loans of $26,444 as demand for residential real estate loans continued to be soft and the market for consumer loans continued to be dominated by automobile manufacturers.
While our net yield on interest earning assets of 3.45% remains historically low, it has stabilized. The low net yield on interest earning assets is a 4.13%direct result of Federal Reserve Bank monetary policy. While we expect the Federal Reserve Bank to increase short term interest rates in 2015, we do not anticipate any significant improvements in our net yield on interest earning assets under management from December 31, 2012.as the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities will likely increase faster than those of interest earning assets. Net interest income will increase only through continued growth in loans, investments, and other income earning assets.
WhileWe anticipate that competition for high qualitycommercial loans has been intense, we have not relaxedwill continue to be significant, residential mortgage loan activity will remain soft, and growing our underwriting standards and we remain committeddeposit base will be challenging throughout the foreseeable future. Despite these challenges, our unwavering commitment to core community banking principles and long term sustainable growth. This focusgrowth has, enabledand will continue to, enable us to continue to meet the needs of the communities we serve which translates into increasedand increase shareholder value. Our loan quality remains sound as evidenced by the relatively low percentage of loans classified as nonperforming. As of December 31, 2013, our ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.42%. In comparison, the average percentage for all bank holding companies in our peer group was 1.71% as of September 30, 2013 (peer group ratios are not yet available for December 31, 2013). In addition, our risk based capital to risk adjusted total assets ratio of 14.92% as of December 31, 2013 compares favorably to the 8.00% ratio required to be classified as adequately capitalized under the Federal Reserve Board's risk based capital rules.
In August 2013, we opened our latest branch in Big Rapids, Michigan. We are excited about our newest branch's growth potential and the new relationships that we have established. The new location has complemented our existing Big Rapids office and will provide additional shareholder value for years to come.
In order to preserve our culture and provide strong leadership for the future we emphasize succession planning. We have made significant investments in employee development and as a result, we have a tremendous amount of leadership and professional strength throughout our organization. The selection of Jae A. Evans, previously Isabella Bank's Chief Operations Officer, as Richard J. Barz's successor as CEO of Isabella Bank Corporation effective January 1, 2014 was no exception to this commitment. Mr. Evans has been with the Bank since 2008 and has more than 36 years of banking experience. Prior to his position as Chief Operations Officer, Mr. Evans served as the president of the Greenville Division of Isabella Bank. Mr. Barz continues to serve on the Board of Directors for both Isabella Bank and Isabella Bank Corporation.
Recent Legislation
The Health Care and Education Act of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the JOBS Act, have already had, and are expected to continue to have, a negative impact on our operating results. Of these four acts, the Dodd-Frank Act has had the most significant impact. The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB which has made significant changes in the regulation of financial institutions aimed at strengthening the oversight of the federal government over the operation of the financial services sector and increasing the protection of consumers. As a result ofRules issued by the implementation of some of the provisions, we have had increases in operational costs and this trend is expected to continue.
The CFPB has begun to issue substantial proposed and final rules regarding consumer lending, including residential mortgage lending. These rules will likely further increaselending have increased our compensation and outside advisor costs to ensure our compliance with the new regulations. In additionregulations and this trend is expected to increased costs, we anticipate that residential mortgage volume will likely decline in 2014 due to the strict underwriting standards that have removed business judgment from the underwriting process.continue.
On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules, which will be gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation.Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically.
Other
We have not received any notices of regulatory actions as of February 28, 2014.27, 2015.


26


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are set forth in Note“Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesPolicies” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Of these significant accounting policies, we consider our policies regarding the ALLL, acquisition intangibles and goodwill, and the determination of the fair value and assessment of OTTI of investment securities to be our most critical accounting policies.
The ALLL requires our most subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions can have a significant impact on the ALLL and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of operations. We have developed policies and procedures for assessing the appropriateness of the ALLL, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to our loan portfolio. Our assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which is not known to us at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning our ALLL and related matters, see the detailed discussion to follow under the caption Allowance“Allowance for Loan and Lease LossesLosses” and Note 6“Note 5 – Loans and ALLLALLL” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that we determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity, and record their fair value on the date of acquisition. We employ a variety of measures in the determination of the fair value, including the use of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and projected future revenue streams. For certain items that we believe we have the appropriate expertise to determine the fair value, we may choose to use our own calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is not easily determined, we consult with outside parties to determine the fair value of the identified asset or liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and the net value of assets acquired on our balance sheet, including identifiable intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired on at least an annual basis.
We currently have both AFS and trading investment securities that are carried at fair value. Changesvalue with changes in the fair value of AFS investment securities are included as a component of other comprehensive income, while declinesincome. Declines in the fair value of theseAFS securities below their cost that are other-than-temporary are reflected as realized losses in the consolidated statements of income. The change in value of trading investment securities is included in current earnings. We evaluate AFS securities for indications of losses that are considered other-than-temporary, if any, on a regular basis. The market values for AFS and trading investment securities are typically obtained from outside sources and applied to individual securities within the portfolio.


27


Table of Contents

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities,Average Balances, Interest Rate, and Shareholders' Equity;Net Interest Rates and Interest DifferentialIncome
The following schedules present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities for the last three years. These schedules also present an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the yearsperiods indicated. All interest income is reported on a FTE basis using a 34% federal income tax rate. NonaccruingNonaccrual loans, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan amounts outstanding.balances. FRB and FHLB restricted equity holdings are included in accrued income and other assets.
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012

Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS                                  
Loans$790,132
 $41,233
 5.22% $754,304
 $43,396
 5.75% $743,441
 $45,463
 6.12%$813,202
 $39,432
 4.85% $790,132
 $41,233
 5.22% $754,304
 $43,396
 5.75%
Taxable investment securities335,575
 7,228
 2.15% 309,681
 7,555
 2.44% 235,437
 6,941
 2.95%357,250
 8,092
 2.27% 335,575
 7,228
 2.15% 309,681
 7,555
 2.44%
Nontaxable investment securities165,774
 8,294
 5.00% 145,502
 7,941
 5.46% 136,356
 7,847
 5.75%194,751
 9,877
 5.07% 165,774
 8,294
 5.00% 145,502
 7,941
 5.46%
Trading account securities1,071
 55
 5.14% 2,624
 142
 5.41% 5,087
 286
 5.62%
Trading securities174
 9
 5.17% 1,071
 55
 5.14% 2,624
 142
 5.41%
Other27,235
 447
 1.64% 33,359
 486
 1.46% 37,539
 506
 1.35%25,610
 510
 1.99% 27,235
 447
 1.64% 33,359
 486
 1.46%
Total earning assets1,319,787
 57,257
 4.34% 1,245,470
 59,520
 4.78% 1,157,860
 61,043
 5.27%1,390,987
 57,920
 4.16% 1,319,787
 57,257
 4.34% 1,245,470
 59,520
 4.78%
NONEARNING ASSETS                                  
ALLL(11,877)     (12,408)     (12,522)    
Allowance for loan losses(10,973)     (11,877)     (12,408)    
Cash and demand deposits due from banks18,162
     19,409
     20,195
    18,552
     18,162
     19,409
    
Premises and equipment25,993
     25,244
     24,397
    25,957
     25,993
     25,244
    
Accrued income and other assets96,375
     103,368
     97,265
    97,657
     96,375
     103,368
    
Total assets$1,448,440
     $1,381,083
     $1,287,195
    $1,522,180
     $1,448,440
     $1,381,083
    
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                                  
Interest bearing demand deposits$183,665
 161
 0.09% $170,851
 204
 0.12% $152,530
 189
 0.12%$191,750
 157
 0.08% $183,665
 161
 0.09% $170,851
 204
 0.12%
Savings deposits242,777
 366
 0.15% 214,958
 451
 0.21% 192,999
 488
 0.25%260,469
 374
 0.14% 242,777
 366
 0.15% 214,958
 451
 0.21%
Time deposits456,774
 6,613
 1.45% 473,675
 8,476
 1.79% 467,931
 10,258
 2.19%448,971
 5,764
 1.28% 456,774
 6,613
 1.45% 473,675
 8,476
 1.79%
Borrowed funds251,590
 3,881
 1.54% 225,689
 4,292
 1.90% 198,828
 5,268
 2.65%274,080
 3,675
 1.34% 251,590
 3,881
 1.54% 225,689
 4,292
 1.90%
Total interest bearing liabilities1,134,806
 11,021
 0.97% 1,085,173
 13,423
 1.24% 1,012,288
 16,203
 1.60%1,175,270
 9,970
 0.85% 1,134,806
 11,021
 0.97% 1,085,173
 13,423
 1.24%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                                  
Demand deposits141,872
     125,443
     113,726
    165,860
     141,872
     125,443
    
Other8,752
     9,785
     9,802
    10,773
     8,752
     9,785
    
Shareholders’ equity163,010
     160,682
     151,379
    170,277
     163,010
     160,682
    
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,448,440
     $1,381,083
     $1,287,195
    $1,522,180
     $1,448,440
     $1,381,083
    
Net interest income (FTE)  $46,236
     $46,097
     $44,840
    $47,950
     $46,236
     $46,097
  
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)    3.50%     3.70%     3.87%    3.45%     3.50%     3.70%

28


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest expenses on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is influenced by changes in the balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest rates. We exert some control over these factors; however, FRB monetary policy and competition have a significant impact. Interest income includes loan fees of $3,182 in 2013, $3,178 in 2012, and $2,385 in 2011. For analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to an FTE basis by adding the income tax savings from interest on tax exempt loans, AFS securities, and tradingnontaxable investment securities, thus making year to year comparisons more meaningful. Included in interest income are loan fees which are displayed in the following table for the years ended December 31:
 2014 2013 2012
Loan fees$2,199
 $3,182
 $3,178
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
The following table sets forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For the purpose of this table, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:
Volume—change in volume multiplied by the previous year’speriod's FTE rate.
Rate—change in the FTE rate multiplied by the previous year’speriod's volume.
The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
2013 Compared to 2012 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to
 2012 Compared to 2011 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to
2014 Compared to 2013 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to
 2013 Compared to 2012 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to

Volume Rate Net Volume Rate NetVolume Rate Net Volume Rate Net
Changes in interest income                      
Loans$1,996
 $(4,159) $(2,163) $656
 $(2,723) $(2,067)$1,179
 $(2,980) $(1,801) $1,996
 $(4,159) $(2,163)
Taxable AFS securities601
 (928) (327) 1,945
 (1,331) 614
Nontaxable AFS securities1,049
 (696) 353
 511
 (417) 94
Taxable investment securities480
 384
 864
 601
 (928) (327)
Nontaxable investment securities1,468
 115
 1,583
 1,049
 (696) 353
Trading securities(80) (7) (87) (134) (10) (144)(46) 
 (46) (80) (7) (87)
Other(96) 57
 (39) (59) 39
 (20)(28) 91
 63
 (96) 57
 (39)
Total changes in interest income3,470
 (5,733) (2,263) 2,919
 (4,442) (1,523)3,053
 (2,390) 663
 3,470
 (5,733) (2,263)
Changes in interest expense                      
Interest bearing demand deposits14
 (57) (43) 22
 (7) 15
7
 (11) (4) 14
 (57) (43)
Savings deposits53
 (138) (85) 52
 (89) (37)26
 (18) 8
 53
 (138) (85)
Time deposits(293) (1,570) (1,863) 124
 (1,906) (1,782)(111) (738) (849) (293) (1,570) (1,863)
Borrowed funds457
 (868) (411) 647
 (1,623) (976)329
 (535) (206) 457
 (868) (411)
Total changes in interest expense231
 (2,633) (2,402) 845
 (3,625) (2,780)251
 (1,302) (1,051) 231
 (2,633) (2,402)
Net change in interest margin (FTE)$3,239
 $(3,100) $139
 $2,074
 $(817) $1,257
$2,802
 $(1,088) $1,714
 $3,239
 $(3,100) $139
As shown in the following table, we experienced significant downward pressure on ourOur net yield on interest earning assets over the past 12 months. This pressureremains at historically low levels which is a direct result of FRB monetary policy which has reduced yields on interest earning assets more than rates on interest bearing liabilities.policy. The persistent low interest rate environment coupled with an increase in the concentration of AFS securities and trading securities as a percentage of earningsearning assets has also placed downward pressure on net interest margin yield. While we anticipate that the FRB will increase short term interest rates in 2015, we do not expect any significant change in our net yield on interest earning assets as the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities will likely increase faster than those of interest earning assets. Net interest income will increase only through continued balance sheet growth.
Average Yield / Rate for the Three Month Periods Ended:Average Yield / Rate for the Unaudited Three Month Periods Ended:
December 31
2013

September 30
2013

June 30
2013

March 31
2013

December 31
2012
December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
Total earning assets4.30% 4.31% 4.35% 4.41% 4.61%4.17% 4.10% 4.14% 4.14% 4.30%
Total interest bearing liabilities0.94% 0.96% 0.99% 1.01% 1.12%0.85% 0.85% 0.84% 0.85% 0.94%
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)3.50% 3.48% 3.50% 3.54% 3.65%3.46% 3.39% 3.43% 3.42% 3.50%

29


Table of Contents

 Quarter to Date (Unaudited) Net Interest Income (FTE)

December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
Total interest income (FTE)$14,702
 $14,357
 $14,282
 $14,242
 $14,441
Total interest expense2,504
 2,498
 2,468
 2,500
 2,683
Net interest income (FTE)$12,198
 $11,859
 $11,814
 $11,742
 $11,758
While there have been increases in long term interest rates, short and medium term interest rates continueOne of the the primary contributors to be at historically low levels. We do not anticipate any significant changesthe decline in net interest margin yield in the near future. Despite the challenging current interest rate environment, we anticipate net interest income and the net yield on interest earning assets (FTE) will modestly increaseduring 2014 was a drastic decline in loan fees. Loan fees have declined as most interest earning assets have already repriced at lower rates while some interest bearing liabilities will likely reprice at lower interest rates in coming periods.the demand for residential mortgage loans has diminished and the competition for commercial loans remains intense. As shown in in the following table, the net yield on interest earning assets and net interest income inexcluding the impact of loan fees (FTE) has remained essentially unchanged since the fourth quarter of 2013 exceeded net interest income in each of2013. The following table displays unaudited data for the previous four quarters.three month periods ended:
 Quarter to Date Net Interest Income
 December 31
2013
 September 30
2013
 June 30
2013
 March 31
2013
 December 31
2012
Total interest income$13,603
 $13,505
 $13,440
 $13,528
 $13,845
Total interest expense2,683
 2,736
 2,781
 2,821
 3,051
Net interest income$10,920
 $10,769
 $10,659
 $10,707
 $10,794

December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
Net interest income (FTE)$12,198
 $11,859
 $11,814
 $11,742
 $11,758
Less loan fees669
 488
 566
 476
 761
Net interest income excluding loan fees (FTE)$11,529
 $11,371
 $11,248
 $11,266
 $10,997
Net yield on interest earning assets excluding loan fees (FTE)3.27% 3.25% 3.26% 3.28% 3.27%
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The viability of any financial institution is ultimately determined by its management of credit risk. Loans represent our single largest concentration of risk. The ALLL is our estimation of incurred losses within the existing loan portfolio. We allocate the ALLL throughout the loan portfolio based on our assessment of the underlying risks associated with each loan segment. Our assessments include allocations based on specific impairment valuation allowances, historical charge-offs,charge-offs, internally assigned credit risk ratings, and past due and nonaccrual balances. A portion of the ALLL is not allocated to any one loan segment, but is instead a reflection of other qualitative risks withinthat reflects the loanmargin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
The following table summarizes our charge-offs, recoveries, provisions for loan losses, and ALLL balances as of, and for the unaudited three month periods ended:

December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
Total charge-offs$351
 $416
 $411
 $450
 $497
Total recoveries115
 278
 211
 292
 152
Net loan charge-offs236
 138
 200
 158
 345
Net loan charge-offs to average loans outstanding0.03 % 0.02 % 0.02 % 0.02 % 0.04%
Provision for loan losses$(64) $(162) $(200) $(242) $245
Provision for loan losses to average loans outstanding(0.01)% (0.02)% (0.02)% (0.03)% 0.03%
ALLL$10,100
 $10,400
 $10,700
 $11,100
 $11,500
ALLL as a% of loans at end of period1.21 % 1.26 % 1.31 % 1.37 % 1.42%

30


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our charge-off and recovery activity for the years ended December 31:31:

2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
ALLL at beginning of period$11,936
 $12,375
 $12,373
 $12,979
 $11,982
$11,500
 $11,936
 $12,375
 $12,373
 $12,979
Loans charged-off         
Charge-offs         
Commercial and agricultural907
 1,672
 1,984
 3,731
 3,081
590
 907
 1,672
 1,984
 3,731
Residential real estate1,004
 1,142
 2,240
 2,524
 2,627
722
 1,004
 1,142
 2,240
 2,524
Consumer429
 542
 552
 596
 934
316
 429
 542
 552
 596
Total loans charged-off2,340
 3,356
 4,776
 6,851
 6,642
Total charge-offs1,628
 2,340
 3,356
 4,776
 6,851
Recoveries                  
Commercial and agricultural363
 240
 461
 453
 623
550
 363
 240
 461
 453
Residential real estate181
 122
 177
 638
 546
197
 181
 122
 177
 638
Consumer249
 255
 314
 297
 377
149
 249
 255
 314
 297
Total recoveries793
 617
 952
 1,388
 1,546
896
 793
 617
 952
 1,388
Provision for loan losses1,111
 2,300
 3,826
 4,857
 6,093
(668) 1,111
 2,300
 3,826
 4,857
ALLL at end of period$11,500
 $11,936
 $12,375
 $12,373
 $12,979
10,100
 11,500
 11,936
 12,375
 12,373
Net loans charged-off$1,547
 $2,739
 $3,824
 $5,463
 $5,096
Net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding0.20% 0.36% 0.51% 0.75% 0.70%
ALLL as a % of loans at end of period1.42% 1.54% 1.65% 1.68% 1.79%
Net loan charge-offs$732
 $1,547
 $2,739
 $3,824
 $5,463
Net loan charge-offs to average loans outstanding0.09% 0.20% 0.36% 0.51% 0.75%
ALLL as a% of loans at end of period1.21% 1.42% 1.54% 1.65% 1.68%
The following table summarizes our charge-off and recovery activity for the three months ended:
 December 31
2013
 September 30
2013
 June 30
2013
 March 31
2013
 December 31
2012
Total loans charged-off$497
 $602
 $719
 $522
 $1,469
Total recoveries152
 151
 295
 195
 143
Net loans charged-off345
 451
 424
 327
 1,326
Net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding0.04% 0.06% 0.05% 0.04% 0.17%
Provision for loan losses$245
 $351
 $215
 $300
 $1,200

30

Table of Contents

As the level of net loans charged-off has continuedloan charge-offs continues to decline since 2008,and credit quality indicators continue to improve, we have been able to gradually reducereduced the ALLL in both amount and as a percentage of loans. We anticipate 2014 net loans charged-off to approximate 2013 levels and, as such, we anticipate that the ALLL will approximate current levels. While overall net loans charged-off is likely to remain at current levels in the near future, charge-offs on residential real estate loans are anticipated to increase slightly as a percentage of net loans charged-off due to increased foreclosures as a result of the impact of the CFPB ability to repay rules. For further discussion of the allocation of the ALLL,, see “Note 65Loans and ALLL” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Loans Past Due and Loans in Nonaccrual Status
Increases in past due and nonaccrual loans can have a significant impact on the ALLL. To determine the potential impact, and corresponding estimated losses, we analyze our historical loss trends on loans past due greater than 30 days and nonaccrual loans. We monitor all loans that are past due and in nonaccrual status for indicatorsindications of additional deterioration.
Total Past Due and NonaccrualTotal Past Due and Nonaccrual

December 31
2013
 September 30
2013
 June 30
2013
 March 31
2013
 December 31
2012
December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
 December 31
2013
Commercial and agricultural$3,621
 $5,371
 $4,962
 $8,713
 $7,271
$4,805
 $3,904
 $5,045
 $4,986
 $3,621
Residential real estate7,008
 6,339
 5,080
 4,077
 5,431
4,181
 4,011
 4,613
 7,067
 7,008
Consumer259
 152
 104
 212
 199
138
 134
 98
 113
 259
Total$10,888
 $11,862
 $10,146
 $13,002
 $12,901
$9,124
 $8,049
 $9,756
 $12,166
 $10,888
Total Past Due and Nonaccrual as of December 31Total Past Due and Nonaccrual as of December 31
2013 2012 2011 2011 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Commercial and agricultural$3,621
 $7,271
 $7,420
 $9,606
 $8,839
$4,805
 $3,621
 $7,271
 $7,420
 $9,606
Residential real estate7,008
 5,431
 5,297
 8,119
 10,296
4,181
 7,008
 5,431
 5,297
 8,119
Consumer259
 199
 186
 309
 460
138
 259
 199
 186
 309
Total$10,888
 $12,901
 $12,903
 $18,034
 $19,595
$9,124
 $10,888
 $12,901
 $12,903
 $18,034
Declines in past due and nonaccrual loans during 2014 are the result of strengthened loan performance. A summary of loans past due and in nonaccrual status, including the composition of the ending balance of nonaccrual loans by type, is included in “Note 65 – Loans and ALLL” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
We have taken a proactive approach to avoid foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with us in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable. While this approach has allowed certain borrowers to develop a payment structure

31



that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure, it has contributed to a significant increase in the level of loans classified asTDRs. The implementation of ASU No. 2011-02 “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring” has also contributed to the increased level of TDRs. The modifications have been successful for us and our customers as very few of the modified loans have resulted in foreclosures. At the time of the TDR, the loan is reviewed to determine whether or not to classify the loan as accrual or nonaccrual. The majority of new modifications result in terms that satisfy our criteria for continued interest accrual. TDRs that have been placed in nonaccrual status may be placed back on accrual status after six months months of continued performance.
We restructure debt with borrowers who due to temporary financial difficulties are unable to service their debt under the original terms. We may extend the amortization period, reduce interest rates, forgive principal, forgive interest, or a combination of these modifications. Typically, the modifications are for a period of five years or less. There were no TDRs that were Government sponsored as of December 31, 20132014 or December 31, 20122013.
Losses associated with TDRs, if any, are included in the estimation of the ALLL in the quarter in which a loan is identified as a TDR, and we review the analysis of the ALLL estimation each reporting period to ensure its continued appropriateness.

31


The following table providestables provide a roll-forward of TDRs for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2013:2014:

Accruing Interest Nonaccrual TotalAccruing Interest Nonaccrual Total

Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 BalanceNumber
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance
January 1, 2012112
 $17,739
 12
 $1,017
 124
 $18,756
January 1, 2013115
 $16,531
 19
 $2,824
 134
 $19,355
New modifications58
 10,149
 9
 1,217
 67
 11,366
76
 12,192
 5
 424
 81
 12,616
Principal payments
 (1,578) 
 (287) 
 (1,865)
Principal advances (payments)
 (891) 
 (292) 
 (1,183)
Loans paid-off(40) (7,719) (4) (158) (44) (7,877)(17) (2,844) (6) (800) (23) (3,644)
Partial charge-off
 (231) 
 (40) 
 (271)
Balances charged-off(2) (140) (4) (100) (6) (240)
Transfers to OREO(2) (134) (5) (380) (7) (514)
Transfers to accrual status2
 131
 (2) (131) 
 
Transfers to nonaccrual status(13) (1,686) 13
 1,686
 
 
December 31, 2012115
 16,531
 19
 2,824
 134
 19,355
New modifications76
 12,192
 5
 424
 81
 12,616
Principal payments
 (891) 
 (292) 
 (1,183)
Loans paid-off(17) (2,844) (6) (800) (23) (3,644)
Partial charge-off
 (79) 
 (477) 
 (556)
Partial charge-offs
 (79) 
 (477) 
 (556)
Balances charged-off(3) (167) (1) (27) (4) (194)(3) (167) (1) (27) (4) (194)
Transfers to OREO(1) (33) (7) (496) (8) (529)(1) (33) (7) (496) (8) (529)
Transfers to accrual status2
 133
 (2) (133) 
 
2
 133
 (2) (133) 
 
Transfers to nonaccrual status(7) (419) 7
 419
 
 
(7) (419) 7
 419
 
 
December 31, 2013165
 $24,423
 15
 $1,442
 180
 $25,865
165
 24,423
 15
 1,442
 180
 25,865
New modifications30
 2,647
 5
 367
 35
 3,014
Principal advances (payments)
 (1,501) 
 (254) 
 (1,755)
Loans paid-off(32) (2,964) (3) (90) (35) (3,054)
Partial charge-offs
 (70) 
 (193) 
 (263)
Balances charged-off(3) (13) (3) (115) (6) (128)
Transfers to OREO
 
 (5) (338) (5) (338)
Transfers to accrual status5
 502
 (5) (502) 
 
Transfers to nonaccrual status(9) (2,093) 9
 2,093
 
 
December 31, 2014156
 $20,931
 13
 $2,410
 169
 $23,341
The following table summarizes our TDRs as of December 31:
 2013 2012 2011

Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total
Current$21,690
 $1,189
 $22,879
 $16,301
 $941
 $17,242
 $16,125
 $514
 $16,639
Past due 30-59 days2,158
 37
 2,195
 158
 561
 719
 1,564
 344
 1,908
Past due 60-89 days575
 
 575
 72
 41
 113
 50
 85
 135
Past due 90 days or more
 216
 216
 
 1,281
 1,281
 
 74
 74
Total$24,423
 $1,442
 $25,865
 $16,531
 $2,824
 $19,355
 $17,739
 $1,017
 $18,756
2010 20092014 2013 2012

Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual TotalAccruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total
Current$4,798
 $499
 $5,297
 $2,754
 $786
 $3,540
20,012
 272
 20,284
 21,690
 1,189
 22,879
 16,301
 941
 17,242
Past due 30-59 days175
 26
 201
 107
 80
 187
804
 592
 1,396
 2,158
 37
 2,195
 158
 561
 719
Past due 60-89 days102
 
 102
 
 824
 824
115
 3
 118
 575
 
 575
 72
 41
 113
Past due 90 days or more
 163
 163
 
 426
 426

 1,543
 1,543
 
 216
 216
 
 1,281
 1,281
Total$5,075
 $688
 $5,763
 $2,861
 $2,116
 $4,977
20,931
 2,410
 23,341
 24,423
 1,442
 25,865
 16,531
 2,824
 19,355

32




2011 2010
 Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total
Current16,125
 514
 16,639
 4,798
 499
 5,297
Past due 30-59 days1,564
 344
 1,908
 175
 26
 201
Past due 60-89 days50
 85
 135
 102
 
 102
Past due 90 days or more
 74
 74
 
 163
 163
Total17,739
 1,017
 18,756
 5,075
 688
 5,763
Additional disclosures about TDRs are included in “Note 65 – Loans and ALLL” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

32


Impaired Loans
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of December 31:
2013 20122014 2013

Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
 Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
 Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
TDRs                      
Commercial real estate$10,663
 $11,193
 $1,585
 $9,227
 $9,640
 $1,333
$10,222
 $10,501
 $1,276
 $10,663
 $11,193
 $1,585
Commercial other1,310
 1,340
 62
 1,167
 1,197
 38
715
 945
 4
 1,310
 1,340
 62
Agricultural real estate1,459
 1,459
 30
 91
 91
 32
1,423
 1,423
 
 1,459
 1,459
 30
Agricultural other79
 199
 
 569
 689
 59
66
 186
 
 79
 199
 
Residential real estate senior liens12,266
 12,841
 2,010
 8,224
 8,670
 1,429
10,462
 11,019
 1,847
 12,266
 12,841
 2,010
Residential real estate junior liens20
 20
 4
 21
 57
 4
246
 246
 49
 20
 20
 4
Home equity lines of credit153
 453
 46
 
 
 
Consumer secured68
 69
 
 56
 56
 
54
 54
 1
 68
 69
 
Total TDRs25,865
 27,121
 3,691
 19,355
 20,400
 2,895
23,341
 24,827
 3,223
 25,865
 27,121
 3,691
Other impaired loans                      
Commercial real estate1,707
 2,193
 330
 1,817
 2,304
 320
1,009
 1,195
 3
 1,707
 2,193
 330
Commercial other136
 217
 58
 2,245
 2,376
 359
83
 95
 
 136
 217
 58
Agricultural real estate106
 106
 
 
 
 
Agricultural other
 
 
 63
 63
 

 
 
 
 
 
Residential real estate senior liens1,795
 2,473
 268
 2,226
 3,002
 354
1,183
 1,763
 168
 1,795
 2,473
 268
Residential real estate junior liens28
 45
 5
 51
 61
 9
19
 29
 4
 28
 45
 5
Home equity lines of credit193
 493
 
 182
 482
 
97
 197
 29
 193
 493
 
Consumer secured51
 79
 
 19
 28
 
10
 10
 
 51
 79
 
Total other impaired loans3,910
 5,500
 661
 6,603
 8,316
 1,042
2,507
 3,395
 204
 3,910
 5,500
 661
Total impaired loans$29,775
 $32,621
 $4,352
 $25,958
 $28,716
 $3,937
$25,848
 $28,222
 $3,427
 $29,775
 $32,621
 $4,352
Additional disclosure related to impaired loans is included in “Note 65 – Loans and ALLL” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

33



Nonperforming Assets
The following table summarizes our nonperforming assets as of December 31:
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Nonaccrual loans$3,244
 $7,303
 $6,389
 $5,610
 $8,522
$4,044
 $3,244
 $7,303
 $6,389
 $5,610
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more142
 428
 760
 486
 768
148
 142
 428
 760
 486
Total nonperforming loans3,386
 7,731
 7,149
 6,096
 9,290
4,192
 3,386
 7,731
 7,149
 6,096
Foreclosed assets1,412
 2,018
 1,876
 2,067
 1,157
885
 1,412
 2,018
 1,876
 2,067
Total nonperforming assets$4,798
 $9,749
 $9,025
 $8,163
 $10,447
$5,077
 $4,798
 $9,749
 $9,025
 $8,163
Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans0.42% 1.00% 0.95% 0.83% 1.28%0.50% 0.42% 1.00% 0.95% 0.83%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets0.32% 0.68% 0.67% 0.67% 0.91%0.33% 0.32% 0.68% 0.67% 0.67%
After a loan is 90 days past due, it is generally placed in nonaccrual status unless it is well secured and in the process of collection. Upon transferring the loans to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge-offs are necessary. Loans may be placed back on accrual status after six months months of continued performance.
Included in the nonaccrual loan balances above were loans currently classified as TDRs as of December 31:
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Commercial and agricultural$833
 $2,325
 $520
 $115
 $1,692
Residential real estate609
 499
 497
 573
 424
Total$1,442
 $2,824
 $1,017
 $688
 $2,116

33


Nonaccrual TDRs increased in 2012 as a result of two large TDRs that were granted during the year. These relationships had a balance of $756 and $1,710 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The following table lists individually significant commercial and agricultural loan relationships in nonaccrual status. To be classified as individually significant, the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans to each borrower must have exceeded $1,000 as of the end of each period.
 2013 2012 2011

Outstanding
Balance
 Specific
Allocation
 Outstanding
Balance
 Specific
Allocation
 Outstanding
Balance
 Specific
Allocation
Borrower 1$

 $
 $
(A) $
 $1,014
 $
(C)
Borrower 2

 
 
(B) 
 1,900
 
(D)
Borrower 3
(A) 
 2,077

 359
 
 

Borrower 4

 
 

 
 
 

Others not individually significant3,244
    5,226
    3,475
   
Total$3,244
    $7,303
    $6,389
   
 2010 2009
 Outstanding
Balance
 Specific
Allocation
 Outstanding
Balance
 Specific
Allocation
Borrower 1$

 $
 $
 $

Borrower 22,679

 345
 
 

Borrower 3

 
 
 

Borrower 4
(B) 
 1,800
 
(D)
Others not individually significant2,931
    6,722
   
Total$5,610
    $8,522
   
A -Transferred to accrual status.
B -Loan was partially charged-off with the remaining outstanding balance paid off by the customer.
C -No specific allocation as the net realizable value of the loan’s underlying collateral value exceeded the loan’s carrying balance.
D -No specific allocation established for this loan as it was charged down to reflect the current fair value of the underlying real estate.

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Commercial and agricultural$1,995
 $833
 $2,325
 $520
 $115
Residential real estate262
 609
 499
 497
 573
Consumer153
 
 
 
 
Total$2,410
 $1,442
 $2,824
 $1,017
 $688
Additional disclosures about nonaccrual loans are included in “Note 65 – Loans and ALLL”of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
We continue to devote considerable attention to identifying impaired loans and adjusting the net carrying value of these loans to their current net realizable values through the establishment of a specific reserve or the recording of a charge-off. We believe that all loans deemed to be impaired have been identified.
We believe that the level of the ALLL is appropriate as of December 31, 20132014 and we will continue to closely monitor overall credit quality and our policies and procedures related to the analysis of the ALLL to ensure that the ALLL remains appropriate.


34



Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expenses
Noninterest income consists of service charges and fees, gains on sale of mortgage loans, earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies, gains and losses on sales of AFS securities, and other income. Significant account balances are highlighted in the following table with additional descriptions of significant fluctuations for the years ended December 31:
    Change   Change    Change   Change
2013 2012 $ % 2011 $ %2014 2013 $ % 2012 $ %
Service charges and fees                          
NSF and overdraft fees$2,243
 $2,367
 $(124) (5.24)% $2,500
 $(133) (5.32)%$2,156
 $2,243
 $(87) (3.88)% $2,367
 $(124) (5.24)%
ATM and debit card fees1,944
 1,874
 70
 3.74 % 1,736
 138
 7.95 %2,084
 1,944
 140
 7.20 % 1,874
 70
 3.74 %
Trust fees1,154
 1,061
 93
 8.77 % 979
 82
 8.38 %
Freddie Mac servicing fee737
 757
 (20) (2.64)% 732
 25
 3.42 %720
 737
 (17) (2.31)% 757
 (20) (2.64)%
Service charges on deposit accounts373
 337
 36
 10.68 % 324
 13
 4.01 %354
 373
 (19) (5.09)% 337
 36
 10.68 %
Net OMSRs income (loss)269
 (89) 358
 N/M
 (293) 204
 (69.62)%
Net OMSR income (loss)(36) 269
 (305) (113.38)% (89) 358
 N/M
All other116
 125
 (9) (7.20)% 140
 (15) (10.71)%133
 116
 17
 14.66 % 125
 (9) (7.20)%
Total service charges and fees6,836
 6,432
 404
 6.28 % 6,118
 314
 5.13 %5,411
 5,682
 (271) (4.77)% 5,371
 311
 5.79 %
Gain on sale of mortgage loans962
 1,576
 (614) (38.96)% 538
 1,038
 N/M
514
 962
 (448) (46.57)% 1,576
 (614) (38.96)%
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies732
 698
 34
 4.87 % 609
 89
 14.61 %751
 732
 19
 2.60 % 698
 34
 4.87 %
Gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities171
 1,119
 (948) (84.72)% 3
 1,116
 N/M
Gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities97
 171
 (74) (43.27)% 1,119
 (948) (84.72)%
Other          
               
Brokerage and advisory fees704
 574
 130
 22.65 % 545
 29
 5.32 %
Gain on sale of OREO286
 220
 66
 30.00 % 62
 158
 N/M
Corporate Settlement Solutions joint venture143
 504
 (361) (71.63)% (182) 686
 N/M
Trust and brokerage advisory fees2,069
 1,858
 211
 11.36 % 1,635
 223
 13.64 %
Other341
 407
 (66) (16.22)% 525
 (118) (22.48)%483
 770
 (287) (37.27)% 1,131
 (361) (31.92)%
Total other1,474
 1,705
 (231) (13.55)% 950
 755
 79.47 %2,552
 2,628
 (76) (2.89)% 2,766
 (138) (4.99)%
Total noninterest income$10,175
 $11,530
 $(1,355) (11.75)% $8,218
 $3,312
 40.30 %$9,325
 $10,175
 $(850) (8.35)% $11,530
 $(1,355) (11.75)%

35


Significant changes in noninterest income are detailed below:
We continuously analyze various fees related to deposit accounts including service charges and NSF and overdraft fees. Based on these analyses, we make any necessary adjustments to ensure that our fee structure is within the range of our competitors, while at the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit customers. NSF and overdraft fees represent the largest single component of service charges and fees. While we have experienced significant increases in deposit accounts, NSF and overdraft fees continue to decline. This decline has primarily been the result of reduced overdraft activity by our customers. We expect this trend to continue.
As customers continue to increase their dependence on ATM and debit cards, we have seenrealized a corresponding increase in fees. We do not anticipate significant changes to our ATM and debit fee structure; however, we do expect that these fees will continue to increase as the usage of ATM and debit cards increase.
In recent periods, we have invested considerable efforts to increase our market share in trust and brokerage and advisory services. These efforts have translated into increases in trust fees and brokerage and advisory fees. We expect this trend to continue.
Offering rates on residential mortgage loans, isas well as the decline in loan demand, are the most significant driverdrivers behind fluctuations in the gain on sale of mortgage loans and net OMSRsOMSR income (loss). As offering rates increase,a result of the lack of demand in residential mortgage loan originations, we typically experience reductionsare experiencing declines in both the gain on sale of mortgage loans. Offsetting these declines are increases in the value of our mortgage servicing portfolio, leading to the increase inloans and net OMSRs income.OMSR income (loss). As mortgage rates are not expected to noticeably declineapproximate current levels in the foreseeable future and purchase money mortgage activity will likely remain soft, we expect mortgagedo not anticipate any significant changes in origination volumes to significantly decline in 2014 leading to further declines inor the gain on sale of mortgage loans.
We are continually analyzing our AFS securities for potential sale opportunities. These analyses identified several mortgage-backed securities pools in 2014, 2013, and 2012 that made economic sense to sell. We do not anticipate any significant investment sales during 2014.
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies increasedIn recent periods, we have invested considerable efforts to increase our market share in 2012 as a result of the purchase of an additional $4,000trust and brokerage advisory services. These efforts have translated into increases in policies in the third quarter of 2011. Future earnings are expected to approximate current levels.
As property valuestrust fees and the factsbrokerage and circumstances surrounding each property vary, gains or losses from the sale of OREO fluctuates from year to year. We do not anticipate any significant gains or losses on assets currently included in OREO.
Income from the joint venture in Corporate Settlement Solutions has declined in 2013 as a result of the decline in mortgage loan refinancing activity. Additionally, Corporate Settlement Solutions has increased staffing levels to expand its national operations. We expect 2014 earnings to approximate current levels.advisory fees.
The fluctuations in all other income is spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant. We do not anticipate any significant fluctuations from current levels in 2014.


3635



Noninterest expenses include compensation and benefits, furniture and equipment, occupancy, net AFS security impairment loss, and other expenses. Significant account balances are highlighted in the following table with additional descriptions of significant fluctuations for the years ended December 31:
    Change   Change    Change   Change
2013 2012 $ % 2011 $ %2014 2013 $ % 2012 $ %
Compensation and benefits                          
Employee salaries$15,677
 $15,374
 $303
 1.97 % $14,377
 $997
 6.93 %$16,114
 $15,677
 $437
 2.79 % $15,374
 $303
 1.97 %
Employee benefits5,788
 5,853
 (65) (1.11)% 4,915
 938
 19.08 %5,191
 5,788
 (597) (10.31)% 5,853
 (65) (1.11)%
Total compensation and benefits21,465
 21,227
 238
 1.12 % 19,292
 1,935
 10.03 %21,305
 21,465
 (160) (0.75)% 21,227
 238
 1.12 %
Furniture and equipment                          
Service contracts2,277
 1,995
 282
 14.14 % 1,898
 97
 5.11 %2,542
 2,277
 265
 11.64 % 1,995
 282
 14.14 %
Depreciation1,889
 1,796
 93
 5.18 % 1,916
 (120) (6.26)%1,850
 1,889
 (39) (2.06)% 1,796
 93
 5.18 %
ATM and debit card fees710
 690
 20
 2.90 % 629
 61
 9.70 %722
 710
 12
 1.69 % 690
 20
 2.90 %
All other69
 79
 (10) (12.66)% 54
 25
 46.30 %59
 69
 (10) (14.49)% 79
 (10) (12.66)%
Total furniture and equipment4,945
 4,560
 385
 8.44 % 4,497
 63
 1.40 %5,173
 4,945
 228
 4.61 % 4,560
 385
 8.44 %
Occupancy                          
Outside services671
 605
 66
 10.91 % 587
 18
 3.07 %718
 671
 47
 7.00 % 605
 66
 10.91 %
Depreciation667
 621
 46
 7.41 % 605
 16
 2.64 %701
 667
 34
 5.10 % 621
 46
 7.41 %
Utilities502
 463
 39
 8.42 % 462
 1
 0.22 %524
 502
 22
 4.38 % 463
 39
 8.42 %
Property taxes499
 501
 (2) (0.40)% 470
 31
 6.60 %515
 499
 16
 3.21 % 501
 (2) (0.40)%
All other314
 329
 (15) (4.56)% 346
 (17) (4.91)%340
 314
 26
 8.28 % 329
 (15) (4.56)%
Total occupancy2,653
 2,519
 134
 5.32 % 2,470
 49
 1.98 %2,798
 2,653
 145
 5.47 % 2,519
 134
 5.32 %
Net AFS securities impairment loss
 282
 (282) (100.00)% 
 282
 100.00 %
 
 
 
 282
 (282) (100.00)%
Other                          
Marketing and community relations1,131
 1,965
 (834) (42.44)% 1,174
 791
 67.38 %1,431
 1,131
 300
 26.53 % 1,965
 (834) (42.44)%
FDIC insurance premiums1,082
 864
 218
 25.23 % 1,086
 (222) (20.44)%842
 1,082
 (240) (22.18)% 864
 218
 25.23 %
Directors fees819
 885
 (66) (7.46)% 842
 43
 5.11 %
Audit and related fees738
 711
 27
 3.80 % 714
 (3) (0.42)%809
 738
 71
 9.62 % 711
 27
 3.80 %
Director fees775
 819
 (44) (5.37)% 885
 (66) (7.46)%
Education and travel502
 588
 (86) (14.63)% 526
 62
 11.79 %625
 502
 123
 24.50 % 588
 (86) (14.63)%
Postage and freight397
 387
 10
 2.58 % 389
 (2) (0.51)%
Printing and supplies367
 396
 (29) (7.32)% 424
 (28) (6.60)%
Loan underwriting fees423
 403
 20
 4.96 % 331
 72
 21.75 %361
 423
 (62) (14.66)% 403
 20
 4.96 %
Printing and supplies396
 424
 (28) (6.60)% 405
 19
 4.69 %
Postage and freight387
 389
 (2) (0.51)% 388
 1
 0.26 %
Consulting fees349
 315
 34
 10.79 % 482
 (167) (34.65)%
Legal fees359
 268
 91
 33.96 % 302
 (34) (11.26)%320
 359
 (39) (10.86)% 268
 91
 33.96 %
Consulting fees315
 482
 (167) (34.65)% 386
 96
 24.87 %
Other losses250
 109
 141
 129.36 % 300
 (191) (63.67)%
Amortization of deposit premium221
 260
 (39) (15.00)% 299
 (39) (13.04)%183
 221
 (38) (17.19)% 260
 (39) (15.00)%
State taxes171
 140
 31
 22.14 % 187
 (47) (25.13)%
Foreclosed asset and collection211
 202
 9
 4.46 % 576
 (374) (64.93)%122
 211
 (89) (42.18)% 202
 9
 4.46 %
State taxes140
 187
 (47) (25.13)% 57
 130
 N/M
Other losses109
 300
 (191) (63.67)% 54
 246
 N/M
All other1,517
 1,123
 394
 35.08 % 1,131
 (8) (0.71)%1,628
 1,517
 111
 7.32 % 1,123
 394
 35.08 %
Total other8,350
 9,051
 (701) (7.75)% 8,271
 780
 9.43 %8,630
 8,350
 280
 3.35 % 9,051
 (701) (7.75)%
Total noninterest expenses$37,413
 $37,639
 $(226) (0.60)% $34,530
 $3,109
 9.00 %$37,906
 $37,413
 $493
 1.32 % $37,639
 $(226) (0.60)%

3736



Significant changes in noninterest expenses are detailed below:
Employee salaries have increased as a result of normal merit increases and due toadditional staffing required by our continued growth. Employee benefit expenses increasedThe decline in 2012 primarilyemployee benefits is related to health care costs as a result of lower than anticipated claims. Employee benefits are expected to increase moderately in future periods as a result of anticipated increases in health care and retirement related expenses. Despite the increase in employee salaries in 2013, employee benefit expenses declined. This decline was the result of decreases in retirement related expenses. We anticipate that total employee benefits will increase moderately in 2014.
costs.
Service contracts have increased during 2013 due to costs related to data lines as well as increases in various other contracts as we continue to expand our on-line services offered to customers. Service contracts are expected to continue their increases in 2014.
During the first quarter of 2012, we recorded a credit impairment on an AFS security through earnings due to a bond being downgraded below investment grade. We continuously monitor the AFS security portfolio for other potential OTTI. For further discussion, see “Note 5 – AFS Securities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have consistently been a strong supporter of the various communities, schools, and charities in the markets we serve. We sponsor a foundation, which we established in 1996, that is funded by discretionary donations. The affiliated foundation provides centralized oversight for donations to organizations that benefit our communities. Included in marketing and community relations were discretionary donations to the foundation of $200, $850,$500, $200, and $250$850 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,, 2012, and 2011,2012, respectively.
FDIC insurance premiums increased were elevated in 2013 as a result ofdue to us receiving less of a refund for prepaid FDIC insurance premiums than we had anticipated. FDIC insurance premiums have returned to normalized levels and are anticipated to decline slightly in 2014.
Audit and related fees fluctuate from period to period based on the timing of services performed. Audit and related fees are expected to approximate current levels in 2014.
2015.
We place a strong emphasis on employee development through continuous education. Education and travel expenses vary from year to year based on the timing of various programs that our employees attend.Education and travel expenses are expected to increase
Loan underwriting fees have declined in 2014 but are not expected to exceed 2012 levels.
Legal fees increased in 2013 as a result of higher costs associated with filing documents with the SEC, primarily those associated with XBRL tagging as well as legal costs incurreddeclines in relation toresidential real estate loan collection efforts. We expect legal fees to approximate current levels for 2014.
originations.
During the first quarter of 2012, we incurred consulting fees to review our FHLB advances for potential restructuring options. These fees were also elevated in 2012 due to the engagement of consultants to review our loan prepayment and deposit decay assumptions and various information technology projects. Consulting fees are anticipated to approximate current levels in 2014.
Other losses increased significantly in 20122014 primarily as a result of losses incurred related to fraudulent activities as well asactivities. Also contributing to losses in both 2014 and 2012 were losses related to the repurchase of a loanloans that we previously sold to a third party. While other losses fluctuate from period to period, they are expected to approximate current2013 levels in 2014.2015.
The fluctuations in all other expenses are spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant.


3837


Table of Contents

Analysis of Changes in Financial Condition
The following table shows the composition and changes in our balance sheet as of December 31:
    Change    Change
2013 2012 $ %2014 2013 $ %
ASSETS              
Cash and cash equivalents$41,558
 $24,920
 $16,638
 66.77 %$19,326
 $41,558
 $(22,232) (53.50)%
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions580
 4,465
 (3,885) (87.01)%580
 580
 
 
Trading securities525
 1,573
 (1,048) (66.62)%
 525
 (525) (100.00)%
AFS securities    

         
Amortized cost of AFS securities517,614
 490,420
 27,194
 5.55 %561,893
 517,614
 44,279
 8.55 %
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities(5,552) 13,590
 (19,142) (140.85)%
Unrealized Gains (losses) on AFS securities5,641
 (5,552) 11,193
 N/M
AFS securities512,062
 504,010
 8,052
 1.60 %567,534
 512,062
 55,472
 10.83 %
Mortgage loans AFS1,104
 3,633
 (2,529) (69.61)%901
 1,104
 (203) (18.39)%
Loans           

  
Gross loans808,037
 772,753
 35,284
 4.57 %833,582
 808,037
 25,545
 3.16 %
Less allowance for loan and lease losses11,500
 11,936
 (436) (3.65)%10,100
 11,500
 (1,400) (12.17)%
Net loans796,537
 760,817
 35,720
 4.69 %823,482
 796,537
 26,945
 3.38 %
Premises and equipment25,719
 25,787
 (68) (0.26)%25,881
 25,719
 162
 0.63 %
Corporate owned life insurance policies24,401
 22,773
 1,628
 7.15 %25,152
 24,401
 751
 3.08 %
Accrued interest receivable5,442
 5,227
 215
 4.11 %5,851
 5,442
 409
 7.52 %
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values18,293
 18,118
 175
 0.97 %20,076
 18,293
 1,783
 9.75 %
Goodwill and other intangible assets46,311
 46,532
 (221) (0.47)%46,128
 46,311
 (183) (0.40)%
Other assets20,605
 12,784
 7,821
 61.18 %14,632
 20,605
 (5,973) (28.99)%
TOTAL ASSETS$1,493,137
 $1,430,639
 $62,498
 4.37 %$1,549,543
 $1,493,137
 $56,406
 3.78 %
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY              
Liabilities              
Deposits$1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $26,099
 2.56 %$1,074,484
 $1,043,766
 $30,718
 2.94 %
Borrowed funds279,326
 241,001
 38,325
 15.90 %289,709
 279,326
 10,383
 3.72 %
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities9,436
 7,482
 1,954
 26.12 %10,756
 9,436
 1,320
 13.99 %
Total liabilities1,332,528
 1,266,150
 66,378
 5.24 %1,374,949
 1,332,528
 42,421
 3.18 %
Shareholders’ equity160,609
 164,489
 (3,880) (2.36)%174,594
 160,609
 13,985
 8.71 %
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$1,493,137
 $1,430,639
 $62,498
 4.37 %$1,549,543
 $1,493,137
 $56,406
 3.78 %
As shown above, total assets have increased $62,498$56,406 since December 31, 2012.2013. During 2013,2014, we increased our cost basis of AFS securities by $27,194$44,279 while loans grew by $35,284. The$25,545. Contributing to the increase in our AFS securities portfolio was partially offset by $19,142were $11,193 in unrealized lossesgains observed during the year. This balance sheet growth was funded by increases in both deposits and borrowed funds. While we do anticipate that generating quality loans will continue to be competitive, we expect that loans will continue to grow in 2014.2015.
A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major categories follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Included in cash and cash equivalents are funds held with FRB which fluctuate from period-to-period.
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions
During 2013, we reinvested maturities ofAs certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions mature, the funds are reinvested into AFS investment securities to increase net interest margins (as the yields on AFS investment securities exceeded the potential reinvestment rates for

38


Table of Contents

certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions during the year). This trend isWhile there were no maturities in 2014 to reinvest, the maturities in 2015 will likely to continue in 2014.this trend.


39

Table of Contents

AFS investment securities
The primary objective of our investing activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested. Secondary considerations include the need for earnings, liquidity, and our overall exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following is a schedule of the carrying value of AFS investment securities as of December 31:

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Government sponsored enterprises$23,745
 $25,776
 $397
$24,136
 $23,745
 $25,776
 $397
 $5,404
States and political subdivisions201,988
 182,743
 174,938
215,345
 201,988
 182,743
 174,938
 169,717
Auction rate money market preferred2,577
 2,778
 2,049
2,619
 2,577
 2,778
 2,049
 2,865
Preferred stocks5,827
 6,363
 5,033
6,140
 5,827
 6,363
 5,033
 6,936
Mortgage-backed securities144,115
 155,345
 143,602
166,926
 144,115
 155,345
 143,602
 102,215
Collateralized mortgage obligations133,810
 131,005
 99,101
152,368
 133,810
 131,005
 99,101
 43,587
Total$512,062
 $504,010
 $425,120
$567,534
 $512,062
 $504,010
 $425,120
 $330,724
Excluding those holdings in government sponsored enterprises and municipalities within the State of Michigan, there were no investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity. We have a policy prohibiting investments in securities that we deem are unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks. Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backed securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backed securities, and structured notes. Our holdings in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations include only government agencies and government sponsored agencies as we hold no investments in private label mortgage-backed securities or collateralized mortgage obligations.

39


Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of maturities of AFS investment securities and their weighted average yield as of December 31, 2013.2014. Weighted average yields have been computed on an FTE basis using a tax rate of 34%. Our auction rate money market preferred is a long term floating rate instrument for which the interest rate is set at periodic auctions. At each successful auction, we have the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally, the issuers of auction rate securities generally have the right to redeem or refinance the debt. Because of their lack of contractual maturities, auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks are not reported by a specific maturity group. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group due to their variable monthly payments. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Maturing    Maturing    

Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable  Monthly
Payments or
Noncontractual
Maturities
Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable  Monthly
Payments or
Noncontractual
Maturities
Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%)Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%)
Government sponsored enterprises$
  $73
 7.91 $23,672
 1.46 $
  $
 $
  $18,765
 1.46 $5,371
 1.51 $
  $
 
States and political subdivisions961
 6.51 38,794
 4.76 98,965
 4.93 63,268
 4.10 
 13,975
 2.61 58,229
 4.95 100,619
 4.44 42,522
 4.59 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  
  
  
  144,115
 2.05
  
  
  
  166,926
 2.19
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  
  
  
  133,810
 2.30
  
  
  
  152,368
 2.29
Auction rate money market preferred
  
  
  
  2,577
 6.28
  
  
  
  2,619
 6.35
Preferred stocks
  
  
  
  5,827
 5.80
  
  
  
  6,140
 5.78
Total$961
 6.51 $38,867
 4.77 $122,637
 4.26 $63,268
 4.10 $286,329
 2.28$13,975
 2.61 $76,994
 4.10 $105,990
 4.29 $42,522
 4.59 $328,053
 2.34

40

Table of Contents

Loans
Loans are the largest component of earning assets. The proper management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan portfolio is critical to our financial well-being. To control these risks, we have adopted strict underwriting standards. These standards include specific criteria against lending outside our defined market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict loan to collateral value limits. We also monitor and limit loan concentrations to specific industries. We have no foreign loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category in the following table.
The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Commercial$392,104
 $371,505
 $365,714
 $348,852
 $340,274
$431,961
 $392,104
 $371,505
 $365,714
 $348,852
Agricultural92,589
 83,606
 74,645
 71,446
 64,845
104,721
 92,589
 83,606
 74,645
 71,446
Residential real estate289,931
 284,148
 278,360
 284,029
 285,838
264,595
 289,931
 284,148
 278,360
 284,029
Consumer33,413
 33,494
 31,572
 30,977
 32,359
32,305
 33,413
 33,494
 31,572
 30,977
Total$808,037
 $772,753
 $750,291
 $735,304
 $723,316
$833,582
 $808,037
 $772,753
 $750,291
 $735,304

40


Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in the loan portfolio categories for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Commercial$20,599
 5.54 % $5,791
 1.58% $16,862
 4.83 %$39,857
 10.16 % $20,599
 5.54 % $5,791
 1.58%
Agricultural8,983
 10.74 % 8,961
 12.00% 3,199
 4.48 %12,132
 13.10 % 8,983
 10.74 % 8,961
 12.00%
Residential real estate5,783
 2.04 % 5,788
 2.08% (5,669) (2.00)%(25,336) (8.74)% 5,783
 2.04 % 5,788
 2.08%
Consumer(81) (0.24)% 1,922
 6.09% 595
 1.92 %(1,108) (3.32)% (81) (0.24)% 1,922
 6.09%
Total$35,284
 4.57 % $22,462
 2.99% $14,987
 2.04 %$25,545
 3.16 % $35,284
 4.57 % $22,462
 2.99%
We continue to see declines in residential real estate loans which have been offset by increases in commercial and agricultural loans. This trend is likely to continue as the demand for residential real estate loans is anticipated to remain soft due to continuing uncertainty in the residential real estate markets, increases in interest rates, and the implementation of CFPB underwriting guidelines. We expect loans to increase moderately in 2014,2015, with most of the growth in commercial loans.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost and investments in unconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see Note“Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesPolicies” and Note 20“Note 19 – Fair ValueValue” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).
Deposits
Deposits are our primary source of funding. The following table presents the composition of the deposit portfolio as of December 31:
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Noninterest bearing demand deposits$158,428
 $143,735
 $119,072
 $104,902
 $96,875
$181,826
 $158,428
 $143,735
 $119,072
 $104,902
Interest bearing demand deposits192,089
 181,259
 163,653
 142,259
 128,111
190,984
 192,089
 181,259
 163,653
 142,259
Savings deposits243,237
 228,338
 193,902
 177,817
 157,020
261,412
 243,237
 228,338
 193,902
 177,817
Certificates of deposit362,473
 376,790
 395,777
 386,435
 356,594
339,824
 362,473
 376,790
 395,777
 386,435
Brokered certificates of deposit56,329
 55,348
 54,326
 53,748
 50,933
72,134
 56,329
 55,348
 54,326
 53,748
Internet certificates of deposit31,210
 32,197
 31,434
 12,178
 13,119
28,304
 31,210
 32,197
 31,434
 12,178
Total$1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $958,164
 $877,339
 $802,652
$1,074,484
 $1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $958,164
 $877,339

41

Table of Contents

The following table presents the change in the deposit categories for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Noninterest bearing demand deposits$14,693
 10.22 % $24,663
 20.71 % $14,170
 13.51%$23,398
 14.77 % $14,693
 10.22 % $24,663
 20.71 %
Interest bearing demand deposits10,830
 5.97 % 17,606
 10.76 % 21,394
 15.04%(1,105) (0.58)% 10,830
 5.97 % 17,606
 10.76 %
Savings deposits14,899
 6.52 % 34,436
 17.76 % 16,085
 9.05%18,175
 7.47 % 14,899
 6.52 % 34,436
 17.76 %
Certificates of deposit(14,317) (3.80)% (18,987) (4.80)% 9,342
 2.42%(22,649) (6.25)% (14,317) (3.80)% (18,987) (4.80)%
Brokered certificates of deposit981
 1.77 % 1,022
 1.88 % 578
 1.08%15,805
 28.06 % 981
 1.77 % 1,022
 1.88 %
Internet certificates of deposit(987) (3.07)% 763
 2.43 % 19,256
 158.12%(2,906) (9.31)% (987) (3.07)% 763
 2.43 %
Total$26,099
 2.56 % $59,503
 6.21 % $80,825
 9.21%$30,718
 2.94 % $26,099
 2.56 % $59,503
 6.21 %
Overall, deposits continued to grow during 2014. As a result of the current interest rate environment, we continue to see declines in certificates of deposits, but these declines have been offset by increases in noninterest bearing demand deposits and savings accounts. We anticipate depositsexpect this trend to continue to increase in 2014.for the foreseeable future. Growth in 2014 is anticipated to continue to come in the form of non-contractual deposits, while certificates of deposit are expected to approximate current levels.

41


Table of Contents

The remaining maturity of time certificates and other time deposits of $100 or more as of December 31, 20132014 was as follows:
Maturity 
Within 3 months$33,773
$42,416
Within 3 to 6 months26,598
22,303
Within 6 to 12 months48,345
55,257
Over 12 months128,986
124,924
Total$237,702
$244,900
Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds include FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The balance of borrowed funds fluctuates from period to period based on our funding needs including changes in loans, investments, and deposits. The current interest rate environment has made it almost impossible to increase net interest income without increasing earning assets. As deposit growth has generally outpaced loan demand, we continue to deploy deposits into purchases of AFS securities to provide additional interest income. In addition to utilizing deposits, we also utilize borrowings and brokered deposits to fund earning assets.
The following table presents borrowed funds balances for the years ended December 31:

2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
FHLB advances$192,000
 $162,000
 $152,000
 $142,242
 $113,423
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates95,070
 106,025
 66,147
 57,198
 45,871
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates439
 11,301
 16,284
 16,696
 19,623
Federal funds purchased2,200
 
 6,570
 
 16,000
Total$289,709
 $279,326
 $241,001
 $216,136
 $194,917
For additional disclosure related to borrowed funds, see Note 10“Note 9 – Borrowed FundsFunds” of Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities are obligations related to our defined benefit pension plan. Our liability related to the plan increased in 2014 as a result of changes in mortality tables and discount rates used to determine the current benefit obligation. For more information on the defined benefit pension plan, see "Note 16 – Benefit Plans" of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).


42


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments
We have various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, which may require future cash payments. The following schedule summarizes our non-cancelable obligations and future minimum payments as of December 31, 2013:2014:
Minimum Payments Due by PeriodMinimum Payments Due by Period
Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five Years
 TotalDue in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five Years
 Total
Deposits                  
Deposits with no stated maturity$593,754
 $
 $
 $
 $593,754
$634,222
 $
 $
 $
 $634,222
Certificates of deposit with stated maturities207,278
 140,040
 85,550
 17,144
 450,012
217,505
 131,583
 73,451
 17,723
 440,262
Total deposits801,032
 140,040
 85,550
 17,144
 1,043,766
851,727
 131,583
 73,451
 17,723
 1,074,484
Borrowed funds                  
Short-term borrowings106,025
 
 
 
 106,025
97,270
 
 
 
 97,270
Long-term borrowings20,876
 42,425
 70,000
 40,000
 173,301
42,439
 40,000
 60,000
 50,000
 192,439
Total borrowed funds126,901
 42,425
 70,000
 40,000
 279,326
139,709
 40,000
 60,000
 50,000
 289,709
Total contractual obligations$927,933
 $182,465
 $155,550
 $57,144
 $1,323,092
$991,436
 $171,583
 $133,451
 $67,723
 $1,364,193

42

Table of Contents

We also have loan commitments that may impact liquidity. The following schedule summarizes our loan commitments and expiration dates by period as of December 31, 2013.2014. Commitments to grant loans include loans to be sold to the secondary market. Since many of these commitments historically have expired without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent our future cash requirements.
Expiration Dates by PeriodExpiration Dates by Period

Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five
Years
 TotalDue in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five
Years
 Total
Unused commitments under lines of credit$72,166
 $31,141
 $13,059
 $5,593
 $121,959
$68,056
 $27,330
 $18,527
 $3,022
 $116,935
Commitments to grant loans29,096
 
 
 
 29,096
13,988
 
 
 
 13,988
Commercial and standby letters of credit4,169
 
 
 
 4,169
4,985
 
 
 
 4,985
Total loan commitments$105,431
 $31,141
 $13,059
 $5,593
 $155,224
$87,029
 $27,330
 $18,527
 $3,022
 $135,908
For additional disclosure related to Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments, see Note 13“Note 12 – Off-Balance-Sheet ActivitiesActivities” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Capital
Capital consists solely of common stock, retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We are currently authorized to raise capital through dividend reinvestment, employee and director stock purchases, and shareholder stock purchases. Pursuant to these authorizations, we issued 182,755 shares or $4,227 of common stock during 2014, and 149,191 shares or $3,618 of common stock duringin 2013, and 124,530 shares or $2,898 of common stock in 2012. We also offer the Directors Plan in which participants either directly purchase stock or purchase stock units through deferred fees, in lieu of cash payments (see "Note 17 – Benefit Plans" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).payments. Pursuant to this plan, we increased shareholders’ equity by $554495 and $643554 during 20132014 and 20122013, respectively.
We have approved a publicly announced common stock repurchase plan. Pursuant to this plan, we repurchased 98,014135,630 shares or $2,3753,122 of common stock compared to 83,58698,014 shares for $1,9802,375 during 20132014 and 20122013, respectively. As of December 31, 20132014, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional 137,396151,766 shares of common stock.
There are no significant regulatory constraints placed on our capital. The FRB’s current recommended minimum primary capital to assets requirement is 6.00%. Our primary capital to adjusted average assets, which consists of shareholders' equity plus the ALLL acquisition intangibles, was 8.46%8.59% as of December 31, 20132014.

43


Table of Contents

The FRB has established a minimum risk based capital standard. Under this standard,guidelines. Pursuant to these guidelines, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off balance sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The minimum standard is 8.00%, of which at least 4.00% must consist of equity capital net of goodwill. The following table sets forth the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines and our values as of December 31:of:
2013 2012 Required2014 2013 Required
Equity Capital13.67% 13.23% 4.00%14.08% 13.67% 4.00%
Secondary Capital1.25% 1.25% 4.00%1.10% 1.25% 4.00%
Total Capital14.92% 14.48% 8.00%15.18% 14.92% 8.00%
Secondary capital includes only the ALLL. The percentage for the secondary capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed from all sources.
The FRB and FDIC also prescribe minimum capital requirements for Isabella Bank. At December 31, 20132014, the Bank exceeded these minimum capital requirements. On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules, which will be gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation.Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically. For further information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements, see Note 16“Note 15 – Minimum Regulatory Capital RequirementsRequirements” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

43

Table of Contents

Fair Value
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Trading securities, AFS securities and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time-to-time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans AFS, foreclosed assets, OMSRsOMSR, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
For further information regarding fair value measurements, see Note“Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesPolicies” and Note 20“Note 19 – Fair ValueValue” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

44


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change in interest rates. We strive to achieve reasonable stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. One tool we use to measure interest rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the table below, the gap analysis depicts our position for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets.
Trading securities are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame due to their repricing characteristics. Fixed interest rate AFS securities are scheduled according to their contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization. Variable rate loans, which totaled $168,332$172,432 as of December 31, 2013,2014, are included in the time frame of their earliest repricing. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate time deposits in the amount of $1,139$1,123 that are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.
Savings and NOW accounts have no contractual maturity date and are believed by us to be predominantly noninterest rate sensitive. These accounts have been classified in the gap table according to their estimated withdrawal rates based upon our analysis of deposit decay over the past five years. We believe this decay experience is consistent with our expectation for the future. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had a positive cumulative gap within one year. A positive gap position results when more assets, within a specified time frame, have the potential to mature or reprice than liabilities.
The following table shows the time periods and the amount of assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as of December 31, 2013.2014. The interest rate sensitivity information for investment securities is based on the expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the allowance for loan lossesALLL are excluded.
0 to 3
Months
 4 to 12
Months
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
0 to 3
Months
 4 to 12
Months
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
Interest sensitive assets              
Trading securities$525
 $
 $
 $
AFS securities44,680
 87,212
 226,963
 153,207
$23,984
 $85,277
 $273,600
 $184,673
Loans188,897
 89,166
 390,793
 135,937
203,326
 84,090
 390,966
 151,156
Total$234,102
 $176,378
 $617,756
 $289,144
$227,310
 $169,367
 $664,566
 $335,829
Interest sensitive liabilities              
Borrowed funds$116,169
 $10,781
 $112,376
 $40,000
$117,709
 $22,000
 $100,000
 $50,000
Time deposits61,029
 146,624
 225,215
 17,144
68,939
 149,036
 204,564
 17,723
Savings deposits16,598
 20,843
 82,092
 123,704
Interest bearing demand deposits2,390
 7,169
 33,397
 149,133
Savings7,360
 22,619
 88,940
 142,493
NOW2,604
 7,812
 36,104
 144,464
Total$196,186
 $185,417
 $453,080
 $329,981
$196,612
 $201,467
 $429,608
 $354,680
Cumulative gap$37,916
 $28,877
 $193,553
 $152,716
$30,698
 $(1,402) $233,556
 $214,705
Cumulative gap as a % of assets2.54% 1.93% 12.96% 10.23%1.98% (0.09)% 15.07% 13.86%

44

Table of Contents

The following table shows the maturity of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2013.2014. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
1 Year
or Less
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
 Total1 Year
or Less
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
 Total
Commercial and agricultural$88,527
 $264,296
 $131,870
 $484,693
$96,084
 $269,425
 $171,173
 $536,682
Interest sensitivity              
Loans maturing after one year that have:              
Fixed interest rates  $218,869
 $125,938
    $231,583
 $166,707
  
Variable interest rates  45,427
 5,932
    37,842
 4,466
  
Total  $264,296
 $131,870
    $269,425
 $171,173
  


45


Table of Contents

Liquidity
Liquidity is monitored regularly by our Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key ratios, and liquidity available from both primary and secondary sources.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, and AFS securities. These categories totaled $554,725587,440 or 37.15%37.91% of assets as of December 31, 20132014 as compared to $534,968554,725 or 37.39%37.15% as of December 31, 20122013. Liquidity is important for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requests, and various other commitments including expansion of operations, investment opportunities, and payment of cash dividends. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on customer activity.
Our primary source of funds is deposit accounts. We also have the ability to borrow from the FHLB, the FRB, and through various correspondent banks in the form of federal funds purchased.purchased and a line of credit. These funding methods typically carry a higher interest rate than traditional market deposit accounts. Some borrowed funds, including FHLB advances, FRB Discount Window advances, and repurchase agreements, require us to pledge assets, typically in the form of certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions, trading securities, AFS securities or loans as collateral. As of December 31, 20132014, we had available lines of credit of $127,748112,301.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 $ Variance2014 2013 $ Variance
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$22,741
 $19,464
 $3,277
$17,334
 $22,741
 $(5,407)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(64,931) (101,874) 36,943
(74,598) (64,931) (9,667)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities58,828
 78,740
 (19,912)35,032
 58,828
 (23,796)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents16,638
 (3,670) 20,308
(22,232) 16,638
 (38,870)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period24,920
 28,590
 (3,670)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$41,558
 $24,920
 $16,638
Cash and cash equivalents January 141,558
 24,920
 16,638
Cash and cash equivalents December 31$19,326
 $41,558
 $(22,232)

45

Table of Contents

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our primary market risks are interest rate risk and liquidity risk. We have no significant foreign exchange risk and do not utilize interest rate swaps or derivatives, except for interest rate locks and forward loan commitments, in the management of IRR. Any changes in foreign exchange rates or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact on our interest income and cash flows.
IRR is the exposure of our net interest income to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution's interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method by which financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value. Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to our earnings and capital.
The FRB has adopted a policy requiring us to effectively manage the various risks that can have a material impact on our safety and soundness. The risks include credit, interest rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. We have policies, procedures, and internal controls for measuring and managing these risks. Specifically, our Funds Management policy and procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the frequency of measuring and reporting to our Board.
The primary technique to measure IRR is simulation analysis. Simulation analysis forecasts the effects on the balance sheet structure and net interest income under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in interest rates, the shape of yield curves, interest rate relationships, and loan prepayments. These forecasts are compared against net interest income projected in a stable interest rate environment. While many assets and liabilities reprice either at maturity or in accordance with their contractual terms, several balance sheet components demonstrate characteristics that require an evaluation to more accurately reflect their repricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation analysis include prepayments on loans, probable calls of investment securities, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and loan pricing, deposit sensitivity, and customer preferences. These assumptions are inherently uncertain as they are subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment. As a result, the simulation analysis cannot precisely forecast the impact of rising and falling interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to many other factors, including changes in balance sheet components, interest rate changes, changes in market conditions, and management strategies.
Our interest rate sensitivity is estimated by first forecasting the next twelve12 and 24 months of net interest income under an assumed environment of a constant balance sheet and constant market interest rates (base case). We then compare the results of various

46



simulation analyses to the base case. At December 31, 20132014, we projected the change in net interest income during the next twelve12 and 24 months assuming market interest rates were to immediately decrease by 100 basis points and increase by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve during the same time period. We did not project scenarios showing decreases in interest rates beyond 100 basis points as this is considered extremely unlikely given current interest rate levels. These projections were based on our assets and liabilities remaining static over the next twelve12 and 24 months, while factoring in probable calls and prepayments of certain investment securities and real estate residential and consumer loans. While it is extremely unlikely that interest rates would immediately increase to these levels, we feel that these extreme scenarios help us identify potential gaps and mismatches in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. We regularly monitor our forecastedprojected net interest income sensitivity to ensure that it remains within established limits.
The following table summarizes our interest rate sensitivity for 12 and 24 months as of:
December 31, 2014
December 31, 201312 Months 24 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)(100) 0 100 200 300 400(100) 100 200 300 400 (100) 100 200 300 400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(2.85)% 
 0.25% (0.28)% (0.99)% (2.16)%(1.66)% 0.29% 0.45% (3.18)% (4.39)% (1.83)% 0.25% 1.04% (2.70)% (3.98)%
December 31, 2013
December 31, 201212 Months 24 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)(100) 0 100 200 300 400(100) 100 200 300 400 (100) 100 200 300 400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(1.61)% 
 0.49% (1.58)% (1.74)% (2.16)%(2.85)% 0.25% (0.28)% (0.99)% (2.16)% (3.24)% 0.04% 0.29% 0.41% (0.35)%
TheGap analysis, the secondary method to measure IRR, is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flows and/or the earliest repricing of our interest bearing assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet. Significant assumptions are required in this process because of the embedded repricing options contained in assets and liabilities. Residential real estate and consumer loans allow the borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty, while commercial and agricultural loans have prepayment penalties. The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors, including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the current offering rates, the level of sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will result in an

46


increase in cash flows from these assets. A significant portion of our securities are callable or have prepayment options. The call and prepayment options are more likely to be exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Savings and demand accounts may generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical experience. Certificates of deposit have penalties that discourage early withdrawals.
The following tables provide information about assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013. The principal amounts of investments, loans, other interest earning assets, borrowings, and time deposits maturing were calculated based on the contractual maturity dates. SavingsEstimated cash flows for savings and NOW accounts are based on management's estimate of their future cash flows. During the first quarter of 2012, we engaged the services of a third party to analyze our historical loan prepayment speeds and non-contractualestimated deposit decay rates. We have reviewed the results of the analyses in detail and feel that it reasonably reflects the prepayment speeds and decay rates of our loan and deposit portfolios.

December 31, 2013
 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets               
Other interest bearing assets$19,903
 $480
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $20,383
 $20,385
Average interest rates0.25% 1.15% 
 
 
 
 0.27%  
Trading securities$525
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $525
 $525
Average interest rates2.77% 
 
 
 
 
 2.77%  
AFS securities$131,892
 $73,723
 $63,190
 $52,078
 $37,972
 $153,207
 $512,062
 $512,062
Average interest rates2.26% 2.23% 2.42% 2.48% 2.48% 2.80% 2.48%  
Fixed interest rate loans (1)$115,183
 $94,841
 $91,140
 $118,479
 $85,448
 $134,614
 $639,705
 $639,914
Average interest rates5.31% 5.17% 4.93% 4.53% 4.33% 4.33% 4.75%  
Variable interest rate loans (1)$69,036
 $29,460
 $20,332
 $14,208
 $15,699
 $19,597
 $168,332
 $168,332
Average interest rates4.76% 3.90% 4.06% 3.36% 3.35% 3.99% 4.19%  
Rate sensitive liabilities               
Borrowed funds$126,950
 $32,376
 $10,000
 $30,000
 $40,000
 $40,000
 $279,326
 $283,060
Average interest rates0.43% 0.86% 2.15% 1.95% 2.35% 3.02% 1.35%  
Savings and NOW accounts$47,000
 $33,569
 $30,200
 $27,198
 $24,522
 $272,837
 $435,326
 $435,326
Average interest rates0.19% 0.12% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.12%  
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit$206,514
 $81,038
 $58,627
 $46,336
 $39,214
 $17,144
 $448,873
 $451,664
Average interest rates0.89% 1.93% 1.95% 1.63% 1.34% 1.66% 1.36%  
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit$764
 $375
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,139
 $1,139
Average interest rates0.04% 0.40% 
 
 
 
 0.16%  

47




December 31, 2014
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets               
Other interest bearing assets$1,748
 $
 $100
 $
 $
 $
 $1,848
 $1,847
Average interest rates0.36% 
 0.35% 
 
 
 0.36%  
Trading securities$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Average interest rates
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
AFS securities$109,261
 $93,324
 $80,147
 $53,017
 $47,112
 $184,673
 $567,534
 $567,534
Average interest rates2.22% 2.26% 2.32% 2.39% 2.46% 2.62% 2.41%  
Fixed interest rate loans (1)$119,028
 $98,865
 $128,954
 $91,854
 $71,293
 $151,156
 $661,150
 $655,017
Average interest rates4.90% 4.83% 4.53% 4.32% 4.47% 4.25% 4.54%  
Variable interest rate loans (1)$71,435
 $26,938
 $19,836
 $13,929
 $14,706
 $25,588
 $172,432
 $172,432
Average interest rates4.46% 3.97% 3.95% 3.39% 3.37% 4.01% 4.08%  
Rate sensitive liabilities               
Borrowed funds$139,709
 $10,000
 $30,000
 $40,000
 $20,000
 $50,000
 $289,709
 $293,401
Average interest rates0.33% 2.15% 1.95% 2.35% 3.11% 2.53% 1.41%  
Savings and NOW accounts$40,395
 $36,417
 $32,717
 $29,423
 $26,487
 $286,957
 $452,396
 $452,396
Average interest rates0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.10% 0.11%  
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit$216,852
 $74,722
 $56,391
 $50,550
 $22,901
 $17,723
 $439,139
 $439,841
Average interest rates0.96% 1.66% 1.47% 1.31% 1.48% 1.77% 1.25%  
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit$653
 $470
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,123
 $1,123
Average interest rates0.40% 0.40% 
 
 
 
 0.40%  

December 31, 2012December 31, 2013
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total Fair Value2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets                              
Other interest bearing assets$6,411
 $100
 $240
 $
 $
 $
 $6,751
 $6,761
$19,903
 $480
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $20,383
 $20,385
Average interest rates0.86% 0.35% 1.25% 
 
 
 0.86%  0.25% 1.15% 
 
 
 
 0.27%  
Trading securities$1,051
 $522
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,573
 $1,573
$525
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $525
 $525
Average interest rates2.68% 2.54% 
 
 
 
 2.63%  2.77% 
 
 
 
 
 2.77%  
AFS securities$124,452
 $83,606
 $49,419
 $42,655
 $35,504
 $168,374
 $504,010
 $504,010
$131,892
 $73,723
 $63,190
 $52,078
 $37,972
 $153,207
 $512,062
 $512,062
Average interest rates2.42% 2.30% 2.53% 2.82% 2.89% 2.48% 2.50%  2.26% 2.23% 2.42% 2.48% 2.48% 2.80% 2.48%  
Fixed interest rate loans (1)$138,840
 $96,013
 $91,353
 $85,095
 $109,057
 $89,760
 $610,118
 $622,329
$115,183
 $94,841
 $91,140
 $118,479
 $85,448
 $134,614
 $639,705
 $639,914
Average interest rates5.74% 5.62% 5.57% 5.21% 4.60% 4.63% 5.26%  5.31% 5.17% 4.93% 4.53% 4.33% 4.33% 4.75%  
Variable interest rate loans (1)$64,482
 $28,076
 $24,669
 $12,650
 $22,061
 $10,697
 $162,635
 $162,635
$69,036
 $29,460
 $20,332
 $14,208
 $15,699
 $19,597
 $168,332
 $168,332
Average interest rates4.90% 3.77% 3.96% 3.89% 3.36% 3.90% 4.21%  4.76% 3.90% 4.06% 3.36% 3.35% 3.99% 4.19%  
Rate sensitive liabilities                              
Borrowed funds$77,865
 $10,814
 $42,322
 $20,000
 $40,000
 $50,000
 $241,001
 $248,822
$126,950
 $32,376
 $10,000
 $30,000
 $40,000
 $40,000
 $279,326
 $283,060
Average interest rates0.46% 0.65% 1.14% 2.67% 2.15% 3.03% 1.59%  0.43% 0.86% 2.15% 1.95% 2.35% 3.02% 1.35%  
Savings and NOW accounts$35,796
 $32,794
 $29,476
 $26,520
 $23,885
 $261,126
 $409,597
 $409,597
$47,000
 $33,569
 $30,200
 $27,198
 $24,522
 $272,837
 $435,326
 $435,326
Average interest rates0.13% 0.13% 0.12% 0.12% 0.12% 0.11% 0.12%  0.19% 0.12% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.12%  
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit$204,972
 $76,373
 $71,685
 $51,232
 $40,523
 $18,399
 $463,184
 $471,479
$206,514
 $81,038
 $58,627
 $46,336
 $39,214
 $17,144
 $448,873
 $451,664
Average interest rates1.13% 1.69% 2.10% 2.14% 1.72% 1.67% 1.55%  0.89% 1.93% 1.95% 1.63% 1.34% 1.66% 1.36%  
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit$782
 $369
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,151
 $1,151
$764
 $375
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,139
 $1,139
Average interest rates0.46% 0.45% 
 
 
 
 0.46%  0.04% 0.40% 
 
 
 
 0.16%  
 (1) The fair value reported is exclusive of the allocation of the ALLL.
We do not believe that there has been a material change in the nature or categories of our primary market risk exposure, or the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss. As of the date of this report, we do not know of or expect there to be any material change in the general nature of our primary market risk exposure in the near term. As of the date of this report, we do not expect to make material changes in those methods in the near term. We may change those methods in the future to adapt to changes in circumstances or to implement new techniques.

48



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Isabella Bank Corporation
Mount Pleasant, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2014. We also have audited Isabella Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Isabella Bank Corporation’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the effectiveness of Isabella Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20132014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion Isabella Bank Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on the COSO criteria.

Rehmann Robson LLC
Saginaw, Michigan
March 4, 2014

9, 2015

49



Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)thousands)
December 31December 31
2013 20122014 2013
ASSETS      
Cash and cash equivalents      
Cash and demand deposits due from banks$21,755
 $22,634
$18,058
 $21,755
Interest bearing balances due from banks19,803
 2,286
1,268
 19,803
Total cash and cash equivalents41,558
 24,920
19,326
 41,558
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions580
 4,465
580
 580
Trading securities525
 1,573

 525
AFS securities (amortized cost of $517,614 in 2013 and $490,420 in 2012)512,062
 504,010
AFS securities (amortized cost of $561,893 in 2014 and $517,614 in 2013)567,534
 512,062
Mortgage loans AFS1,104
 3,633
901
 1,104
Loans      
Commercial392,104
 371,505
431,961
 392,104
Agricultural92,589
 83,606
104,721
 92,589
Residential real estate289,931
 284,148
264,595
 289,931
Consumer33,413
 33,494
32,305
 33,413
Gross loans808,037
 772,753
833,582
 808,037
Less allowance for loan and lease losses11,500
 11,936
10,100
 11,500
Net loans796,537
 760,817
823,482
 796,537
Premises and equipment25,719
 25,787
25,881
 25,719
Corporate owned life insurance policies24,401
 22,773
25,152
 24,401
Accrued interest receivable5,442
 5,227
5,851
 5,442
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values18,293
 18,118
20,076
 18,293
Goodwill and other intangible assets46,311
 46,532
46,128
 46,311
Other assets20,605
 12,784
14,632
 20,605
TOTAL ASSETS$1,493,137
 $1,430,639
$1,549,543
 $1,493,137
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Deposits      
Noninterest bearing$158,428
 $143,735
$181,826
 $158,428
NOW accounts192,089
 181,259
190,984
 192,089
Certificates of deposit under $100 and other savings455,547
 455,546
456,774
 455,547
Certificates of deposit over $100237,702
 237,127
244,900
 237,702
Total deposits1,043,766
 1,017,667
1,074,484
 1,043,766
Borrowed funds279,326
 241,001
289,709
 279,326
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities9,436
 7,482
10,756
 9,436
Total liabilities1,332,528
 1,266,150
1,374,949
 1,332,528
Shareholders’ equity      
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,723,023 shares (including 12,761 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2013 and 7,671,846 shares (including 5,130 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2012137,580
 136,580
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,776,274 shares (including 13,934 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2014 and 7,723,023 shares (including 12,761 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2013138,755
 137,580
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations4,148
 3,734
4,242
 4,148
Retained earnings25,222
 19,168
32,103
 25,222
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(6,341) 5,007
(506) (6,341)
Total shareholders’ equity160,609
 164,489
174,594
 160,609
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$1,493,137
 $1,430,639
$1,549,543
 $1,493,137

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

50



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands except per share amountsamounts))
Common Stock        Common Stock        
Shares Outstanding Amount Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 TotalsShares
Outstanding
 Amount Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Totals
Balance, January 1, 20117,550,074
 $133,592
 $4,682
 $8,596
 $(1,709) $145,161
Balance, January 1, 20127,589,226
 $134,734
 $4,524
 $13,036
 $2,489
 $154,783
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 10,210
 4,198
 14,408

 
 
 12,206
 2,518
 14,724
Issuance of common stock120,336
 3,075
 
 
 
 3,075
124,530
 2,898
 
 
 
 2,898
Common stock issued for deferred compensation plan39,257
 697
 (773) 
 
 (76)
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 615
 
 
 615
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (426) 
 
 
 (426)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(120,441) (2,204) 
 
 
 (2,204)
Cash dividends ($0.76 per share)
 
 
 (5,770) 
 (5,770)
Balance, December 31, 20117,589,226
 134,734
 4,524
 13,036
 2,489
 154,783
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 12,206
 2,518
 14,724
Issuance of common stock124,530
 2,898
 
 
 
 2,898
Common stock issued for deferred compensation plan41,676
 814
 (814) 
 
 
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations41,676
 814
 (814) 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 619
 (619) 
 
 

 619
 (619) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 643
 
 
 643

 
 643
 
 
 643
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (505) 
 
 
 (505)
 (505) 
 
 
 (505)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(83,586) (1,980) 
 
 
 (1,980)(83,586) (1,980) 
 
 
 (1,980)
Cash dividends ($0.80 per share)
 
 
 (6,074) 
 (6,074)
 
 
 (6,074) 
 (6,074)
Balance, December 31, 20127,671,846
 136,580
 3,734
 19,168
 5,007
 164,489
7,671,846
 136,580
 3,734
 19,168
 5,007
 164,489
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 12,510
 (11,348) 1,162

 
 
 12,510
 (11,348) 1,162
Issuance of common stock149,191
 3,618
 
 
 
 3,618
149,191
 3,618
 
 
 
 3,618
Common stock issued for deferred compensation plan
 
 


 
 
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 140
 (140) 
 
 

 140
 (140) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 554
 
 
 554

 
 554
 
 
 554
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (383) 
 
 
 (383)
 (383) 
 
 
 (383)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(98,014) (2,375) 
 
 
 (2,375)(98,014) (2,375) 
 
 
 (2,375)
Cash dividends ($0.84 per share)
 
 
 (6,456) 
 (6,456)
 
 
 (6,456) 
 (6,456)
Balance, December 31, 20137,723,023
 $137,580
 $4,148
 $25,222
 $(6,341) $160,609
7,723,023
 137,580
 4,148
 25,222
 (6,341) 160,609
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 13,724
 5,835
 19,559
Issuance of common stock182,755
 4,227
 
 
 
 4,227
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations6,126
 143
 (143) 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 258
 (258) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 495
 
 
 495
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (331) 
 
 
 (331)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(135,630) (3,122) 
 
 
 (3,122)
Cash dividends ($0.89 per share)
 
 
 (6,843) 
 (6,843)
Balance, December 31, 20147,776,274
 $138,755
 $4,242
 $32,103
 $(506) $174,594

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

51



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)amounts)
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Interest income          
Loans, including fees$41,233
 $43,396
 $45,463
$39,432
 $41,233
 $43,396
AFS securities          
Taxable7,228
 7,555
 6,941
8,092
 7,228
 7,555
Nontaxable5,132
 4,870
 4,806
5,911
 5,132
 4,870
Trading securities36
 94
 189
6
 36
 94
Federal funds sold and other447
 486
 506
510
 447
 486
Total interest income54,076
 56,401
 57,905
53,951
 54,076
 56,401
Interest expense          
Deposits7,140
 9,131
 10,935
6,295
 7,140
 9,131
Borrowings3,881
 4,292
 5,268
3,675
 3,881
 4,292
Total interest expense11,021
 13,423
 16,203
9,970
 11,021
 13,423
Net interest income43,055
 42,978
 41,702
43,981
 43,055
 42,978
Provision for loan losses1,111
 2,300
 3,826
(668) 1,111
 2,300
Net interest income after provision for loan losses41,944
 40,678
 37,876
44,649
 41,944
 40,678
Noninterest income          
Service charges and fees6,836
 6,432
 6,118
5,411
 5,682
 5,371
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans962
 1,576
 538
514
 962
 1,576
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies732
 698
 609
751
 732
 698
Net gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities171
 1,119
 3
Net gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities97
 171
 1,119
Other1,474
 1,705
 950
2,552
 2,628
 2,766
Total noninterest income10,175
 11,530
 8,218
9,325
 10,175
 11,530
Noninterest expenses          
Compensation and benefits21,465
 21,227
 19,292
21,305
 21,465
 21,227
Furniture and equipment4,945
 4,560
 4,497
5,173
 4,945
 4,560
Occupancy2,653
 2,519
 2,470
2,798
 2,653
 2,519
AFS securities impairment loss          
Total other-than-temporary impairment loss
 486
 

 
 486
Portion of loss reported in other comprehensive income (loss)
 (204) 

 
 (204)
Net AFS securities impairment loss
 282
 

 
 282
Other8,350
 9,051
 8,271
8,630
 8,350
 9,051
Total noninterest expenses37,413
 37,639
 34,530
37,906
 37,413
 37,639
Income before federal income tax expense14,706
 14,569
 11,564
16,068
 14,706
 14,569
Federal income tax expense2,196
 2,363
 1,354
2,344
 2,196
 2,363
NET INCOME$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
Earnings per share     
Earnings per common share     
Basic$1.63
 $1.61
 $1.35
$1.77
 $1.63
 $1.61
Diluted$1.59
 $1.56
 $1.31
$1.74
 $1.59
 $1.56
Cash dividends per basic share$0.84
 $0.80
 $0.76
Cash dividends per common share$0.89
 $0.84
 $0.80





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

52



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in thousands)thousands)
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities          
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year(18,971) 3,921
 9,220
11,290
 (18,971) 3,921
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income(171) (1,119) (3)(97) (171) (1,119)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
 282
 

 
 282
Net unrealized gains (losses)(19,142) 3,084
 9,217
11,193
 (19,142) 3,084
Tax effect (1)6,257
 (348) (3,719)(3,684) 6,257
 (348)
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax(12,885) 2,736
 5,498
7,509
 (12,885) 2,736
Change in unrecognized pension cost on defined benefit pension plan          
Change in unrecognized pension cost arising during the year2,120
 (580) (2,109)(2,836) 2,120
 (580)
Reclassification adjustment for net periodic benefit cost included in net income208
 251
 138
300
 208
 251
Net change in unrecognized pension cost2,328
 (329) (1,971)(2,536) 2,328
 (329)
Tax effect(791) 111
 671
862
 (791) 111
Change in unrealized pension cost, net of tax1,537
 (218) (1,300)(1,674) 1,537
 (218)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(11,348) 2,518
 4,198
5,835
 (11,348) 2,518
Comprehensive income (loss)$1,162
 $14,724
 $14,408
19,559
 1,162
 14,724
(1)
See Note 18“Note 17 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)” in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for tax effect reconciliation.

















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

53



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)thousands)
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES          
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations:     
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Provision for loan losses1,111
 2,300
 3,826
(668) 1,111
 2,300
Impairment of foreclosed assets156
 166
 82
123
 156
 166
Depreciation2,556
 2,417
 2,521
2,551
 2,556
 2,417
Amortization of OMSRs522
 787
 714
Amortization of OMSR265
 522
 787
Amortization of acquisition intangibles221
 260
 299
183
 221
 260
Net amortization of AFS securities2,028
 2,277
 1,689
1,830
 2,028
 2,277
AFS securities impairment loss
 282
 

 
 282
Net (gain) loss on sale of AFS securities(171) (1,119) (3)
Net (gains) losses on sale of AFS securities(97) (171) (1,119)
Net unrealized (gains) losses on trading securities28
 52
 78
5
 28
 52
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans(962) (1,576) (538)(514) (962) (1,576)
Net unrealized (gains) losses on borrowings measured at fair value
 (33) (181)
 
 (33)
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies(732) (698) (609)(751) (732) (698)
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan554
 643
 615
495
 554
 643
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense(1,208) 616
 389
207
 (1,208) 616
Origination of loans held-for-sale(53,632) (99,353) (57,584)(28,135) (53,632) (99,353)
Proceeds from loan sales57,123
 100,501
 56,099
28,852
 57,123
 100,501
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:     
 
  
Trading securities1,020
 3,085
 1,049
520
 1,020
 3,085
Accrued interest receivable(215) 621
 (392)(409) (215) 621
Other assets(122) (2,610) 147
(2,145) (122) (2,610)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities1,954
 (1,360) 449
1,298
 1,954
 (1,360)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities22,741
 19,464
 18,860
17,334
 22,741
 19,464
INVESTING ACTIVITIES          
Net change in certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions3,885
 4,459
 6,884

 3,885
 4,459
Activity in AFS securities          
Sales16,229
 40,677
 8,877
13,362
 16,229
 40,677
Maturities and calls86,225
 89,112
 69,275
Maturities, calls, and principal repayments68,188
 86,225
 89,112
Purchases(131,505) (207,035) (165,017)(127,562) (131,505) (207,035)
Loan principal originations, net(38,503) (27,103) (20,743)
Loan principal (originations) collections, net(27,648) (38,503) (27,103)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets2,122
 1,594
 2,041
1,775
 2,122
 1,594
Purchases of premises and equipment(2,488) (3,578) (2,520)(2,713) (2,488) (3,578)
Purchases of corporate owned life insurance policies(1,092) 
 (4,000)
 (1,092) 
Proceeds from redemption of corporate owned life insurance policies196
 
 

 196
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(64,931) (101,874) (105,203)(74,598) (64,931) (101,874)

54



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Dollars in thousands)thousands)
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Acceptances and withdrawals of deposits, net$26,099
 $59,503
 $80,825
Net increase (decrease) in deposits30,718
 26,099
 59,503
Increase (decrease) in borrowed funds38,325
 24,898
 21,400
10,383
 38,325
 24,898
Cash dividends paid on common stock(6,456) (6,074) (5,770)(6,843) (6,456) (6,074)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock3,618
 2,898
 2,302
4,227
 3,618
 2,898
Common stock repurchased(2,375) (1,980) (1,507)(3,122) (2,375) (1,980)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations(383) (505) (426)(331) (383) (505)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities58,828
 78,740
 96,824
35,032
 58,828
 78,740
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents16,638
 (3,670) 10,481
(22,232) 16,638
 (3,670)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year24,920
 28,590
 18,109
41,558
 24,920
 28,590
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$41,558
 $24,920
 $28,590
$19,326
 $41,558
 $24,920
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:          
Interest paid$11,139
 $13,639
 $16,239
$10,045
 $11,139
 $13,639
Federal income taxes paid2,093
 2,357
 878
1,454
 2,093
 2,357
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:     
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INFORMATION:     
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets$1,672
 $1,902
 $1,932
$1,371
 $1,672
 $1,902

































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

55



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

amounts)
Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Isabella Bank Corporation, a financial services holding company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries,subsidiary, Isabella Bank and Financial Group Information Services.Bank. All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS: Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding company offering a wide array of financial products and services in several mid-Michigan counties. Our banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers banking services through 27 locations, 24 hour banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic teller machines, 24 hour online banking, mobile banking, and direct deposits to businesses, institutions, and individuals. Lending services offered include commercial loans, agricultural loans, residential real estate loans, and consumer loans. Deposit services include interest and noninterest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. Other related financial products include trust and investment services, safe deposit box rentals, and credit life insurance. Active competition, principally from other commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions, exists in all of our principal markets. Our results of operations can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates or changes in the local economic environment.
Financial Group Information Services providesFor additional information, technology services to Isabella Bank Corporation and Isabella Bank.
See also "Note 19see “Note 18 – Related Party Transactions."Transactions.”
USE OF ESTIMATES: In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the ALLL, the fair value of AFS investment securities, and the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, and the determinations of assumptions in accounting for the defined benefit pension plan.assets.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS: Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts such sales or transfers based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Assumptions are developed based on prioritizing information within a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. We may choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates.
For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is our policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements for those financial instruments for which there is an active market. In cases where the market for a financial asset or liability is not active, we include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would make for nonperformance and liquidity risks when developing fair value measurements. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities for which limited or no observable market data exists are accordingly based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Investment securities AFS and trading securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time,time-to-time, we may be required to record other assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans AFS, impaired loans, foreclosed assets, OMSRs,OMSR, goodwill, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

56



Fair Value Hierarchy
Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative guidance, we group assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the prioritization of inputs in the valuation techniques. These levels are:
Level 1:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3:Valuation is generated from model based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Transfers between measurement levels are recognized at the end of reporting periods.
For further discussion of fair value considerations, refer to Note 20“Note 19 – Fair Value.Value.
SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK: Most of our activities conducted are with customers located within the central Michigan area. A significant amount of our outstanding loans are secured by commercial and residential real estate. Other than these types of loans, there is no significant concentration to any other industry or any one customer.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks, federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts. Generally, federal funds sold are for a one dayP1D period. We maintain deposit accounts in various financial institutions which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not insured. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant interest, credit or other financial risk as a result of these deposits.
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT HELD IN OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: Certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions consist of interest bearing certificates of deposit that mature within 3with terms of three years or less and are carried at cost.
TRADING SECURITIES: We engage in trading activities of our own accounts. Securities that are held principally for resale in the near term are recorded in the trading assets account at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest income is included in net interest income.
AFS SECURITIES: Purchases of investment securities are generally classified as AFS. However, we may elect to classify securities as either held to maturity or trading. Securities classified as AFS are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the effect of deferred income taxes, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Included in AFS securities are auction rate money market preferreds and preferred stocks. These investments are considered equity securities for federal income tax purposes, and as such, no estimated federal income tax impact is expected or recorded. Auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Realized gains and losses on the sale of AFS securities are determined using the specific identification method.
AFS securities are reviewed quarterly for possible OTTI. In determining whether an OTTI exists for debt securities, we assert that: (a) we do not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not we will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. If these conditions are not met, we recognize an OTTI charge through earnings for the difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value, and such amount is included in noninterest income. For debt securities that do not meet the above criteria, and we do not expect to recover the security’s amortized cost basis, the security is considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these debt securities, we separate the total impairment into the credit risk loss component and the amount of the loss related to market and other risk factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, we calculate the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit risk is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income. The amount of the total OTTI related to other risk factors is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. For debt securities that have recognized an OTTI through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a significant increase in the cash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.

57


AFS equity securities are reviewed for OTTI at each reporting date. This evaluation considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and our ability and intent to hold the securities until fair value recovers. If it is determined that we

57



do not have the ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery or that there are conditions that indicate that a security may not recover in value then the difference between the fair value and the cost of the security is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income.
LOANS: Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.
The accrual of interest on agricultural, commercial and mortgage loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged offcharged-off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged against the ALLL. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES: The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe the uncollectability of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
We evaluate the ALLL on a regular basis and is based upon our periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The ALLL consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are deemed to be impaired. For such loans that are also analyzed for specific allowance allocations, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows or collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non classified loans and is based on historical loss experience. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that we believe affect our estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.There has been a charge-off of its principal balance;
2.The loan has been classified as a TDR; or
3.The loan is in nonaccrual status.
Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE: Mortgage loans held for sale on the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses, if any, would be recognized as a component of other noninterest expenses.
Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with the mortgage servicing rights retained by us. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loans sold.

58



TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS: Transfers of financial assets, including mortgage loans and participation loans are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is determined to be

58


surrendered when 1) the assets have been legally isolated from us, 2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and 3) we do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Other than servicing, we have no substantive continuing involvement related to these loans.
SERVICING: Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. We have no purchased servicing rights. For sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranche. If we later determine that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. The unpaid principal balance of mortgages serviced for others was $293,665$288,639 and $303,351$293,665 with capitalized servicing rights of $2,555$2,519 and $2,285$2,555 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.
Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. We recorded servicing fee revenue of $720, $737, $757, and $732$757 related to residential mortgage loans serviced for others during 2014, 2013, and 2012, and 2011, respectively, andwhich is included in other noninterest income.
LOANS ACQUIRED THROUGH TRANSFER: Authoritative accounting guidance related to acquired loans requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at acquisition. This standard applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that shows evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was originated.
FORECLOSED ASSETS: Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of our carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the ALLL. After foreclosure, property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred. We periodically perform valuations and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of our carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $1,412$885 and $2,018$1,412 as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, are included in other assets.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT: Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation which is computed principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 40 years. Major improvements are capitalized and appropriately amortized based upon the useful lives of the related assets or the expected terms of the leases, if shorter, using the straight-line method. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occur. We annually review these assets to determine whether carrying values have been impaired.
FDIC INSURANCE PREMIUM: Included in other assets were prepaid FDIC assessments of $0 and $1,804 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
EQUITY SECURITIES WITHOUT READILY DETERMINABLE FAIR VALUES: Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are our holdings in FHLB stock and FRB stock as well as our ownership interests in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLCand Valley Financial Corporation.Corporation. Our investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, a title insurance company, was made in the 1st quarter of 2008. We are not the managing entity of Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, and account for our investment in that entity under the equity method of accounting. Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a bank that opened in 2005. We made investments in Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007.

59


Table of Contents

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values consist of the following as of December 31:
2013 20122014 2013
FHLB Stock$8,100
 $7,850
$9,800
 $8,100
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC6,970
 7,040
6,936
 6,970
FRB Stock1,879
 1,879
1,999
 1,879
Valley Financial Corporation1,000
 1,000
1,000
 1,000
Other344
 349
341
 344
Total$18,293
 $18,118
$20,076
 $18,293
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN: At December 31, 2013,2014, the Directors Plan had 185,311187,369 shares eligible to be issued to participants, for which the Rabbi Trust held 12,76113,934 shares. We had 170,566185,311 shares to be issued in 2012,2013, with 5,13012,761 shares held in the Rabbi Trust. Compensation costs relating to share based payment transactions are recognized as the services are rendered, with the cost measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued (see Note 17“Note 16 – Benefit PlansPlans”). We have no other equity-based compensation plans.
CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE: We have purchased life insurance policies on key members of management. In the event of death of one of these individuals, we would receive a specified cash payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized on the balance sheet dates. Increases in cash surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported as other noninterest income.
As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the present value of the post retirement benefits payable by us to the covered employees was estimated to be $2,699$2,782 and $2,657,$2,699, respectively, and is included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities. The periodic policy maintenance costs were $83, $75, and $24 for 2014, 2013, and $60 for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively and is included in other noninterest expenses.
ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES AND GOODWILL: We previously acquired branch facilities and related deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase. The acquisitions included amounts related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core deposit intangibles). Core deposit intangibles arising from acquisitions are included in goodwill and other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated lives and evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over identifiable assets, is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance is more likely than not to be impaired, we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. This valuation method requires a significant degree of our judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model.
OFF BALANCE SHEET CREDIT RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: In the ordinary course of business, we have entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES: Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax assets or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established, where necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the year plus or minus the change during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
We analyze our filing positions in the jurisdictions where it iswe are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have also elected to retain our existing accounting policy with respect to the treatment of interest and penalties attributable to income taxes, and continue to reflect any charges for such, to the extent they arise, as a component of our noninterest expenses.
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN: We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective March 1, 2007. Defined benefit pension plan expenses are included in “compensation and benefits" on the consolidated statements of income and are funded consistent with the requirements of federal laws and regulations. The current benefit obligation is included in "accrued interest payable and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets. Inherent in the determination of defined benefit pension costs are assumptions concerning future events that will affect the amount and timing of required benefit payments under the plan. These assumptions include demographic assumptions such as mortality, a discount rate used to determine the current benefit obligation and a long-term expected rate of return on plan assets. Net

60


Table of Contents

periodic benefit cost includes interest cost based on the assumed discount rate, an expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value of assets, and amortization of unrecognized net actuarial gains or losses. Actuarial gains and losses result from experience different from that assumed and from changes in assumptions (excluding asset gains and losses not yet reflected in market-related value). Amortization of actuarial gains and losses is included as a component of net periodic defined benefit pension cost.
For additional information, see "Note 16 – Benefit Plans."
MARKETING COSTS: Marketing costs are expensed as incurred (see Note 11“Note 10 – Other Noninterest ExpensesExpenses”).
RECLASSIFICATIONS: Certain amounts reported in the 20122013 and 20112012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 20132014 presentation.

60

Table of Contents

Note 2 – Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued relate solely to outstanding shares in the Directors Plan, see "Note 17“Note 16 – Benefit Plans."Plans.”
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation7,694,392
 7,604,303
 7,572,841
7,734,161
 7,694,392
 7,604,303
Average potential effect of shares in the Directors Plan (1)168,948
 195,063
 194,634
Average potential effect of common shares in the Directors Plan (1)171,393
 168,948
 195,063
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share7,863,340
 7,799,366
 7,767,475
7,905,554
 7,863,340
 7,799,366
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
Earnings per share     
Earnings per common share     
Basic$1.63
 $1.61
 $1.35
$1.77
 $1.63
 $1.61
Diluted$1.59
 $1.56
 $1.31
$1.74
 $1.59
 $1.56
(1) 
Exclusive of shares held in the Rabbi Trust
Note 3 – Pending Accounting Standards Updates
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Update
ASU No. 2013-02: “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting2014-01: “Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects (a consensus of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”
In February 2013,January 2014, ASU No. 2013-022014-01 amended ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income”323, “Investments" to require disclosures relatedallow investors in low income housing tax credits to reclassifications outuse the proportional amortization method if the following criteria are met:
It is probable that the tax credits allocable to the investor will be available.
The investor does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of AOCIthe limited liability entity.
Substantially all of the projected benefits are from tax credits and other tax benefits (e.g., operating losses).
The investor’s projected yield is based solely on the cash flows from the tax credits and other tax benefits are positive.
The investor is a limited liability investor in one place. The ASU also requires the disclosure of reclassifications out of AOCI by component.limited liability entity for both legal and tax purposes, and the investor’s liability is limited to its capital investment.
Investors that do not meet the above criteria must utilize the cost method or equity method in accordance with previously issued authoritative accounting guidance. The new authoritative guidance wasis effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 20122014 and didis not expected to have a financialsignificant impact on our operations.
ASU No. 2014-04: “Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the Corporation, but increasedFASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”
In January 2014, ASU No. 2014-04 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to reduce diversity by clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the levelloan receivable should be

61



derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to AOCI (see "Note 18 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)").
Note 4 – Trading Securities
have a significant impact on our operations.
Trading securities,ASU No. 2014-09: “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
In May 2014, ASU No. 2014-09 created new Topic 606 to provide a common revenue standard to achieve consistency and clarification to the revenue recognition principles. The guidance outlines steps to achieve the core principle which states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. These steps consist of: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations.
ASU No. 2014-11: “Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures”
In June 2014, ASU No. 2014-11 amended ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing” to address concerns that current accounting guidance distinguishes between repurchase agreements that settle at the same time as the maturity of the transferred financial asset and those that settle any time before maturity. The update changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting and, for repurchase financing arrangements, separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to impact our financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2014-14: “Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”
In August 2014, ASU No. 2014-14 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to provide specific guidance on how to classify and measure foreclosed loans that are government guaranteed. The update requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met:
The loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure.
At the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim.
At the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value consist of the following investments at real estate is fixed.
Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31:
15, 2014 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations.
 2013 2012
States and political subdivisions$525
 $1,573
ASU No. 2014-15: “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”
IncludedIn August 2014, ASU No. 2014-15 amended ASC Topic 205, “Presentation of Financial Statements” to provide guidance on how to determine whether to disclose relevant conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, financial statements would continue to be prepared under the going concern assumption; however, disclosures may be necessary depending upon the conditions or events raising substantial doubt. Additionally, if identified substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in net trading losses of $28 during 2013, were $6 of net unrealized trading losses on securitiesthe footnotes indicating that were held inthere is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The new authoritative guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is not expected to impact our trading portfolio as of December 31, 2013. Included in net trading losses of $52 during 2012, were $18 of net unrealized trading losses on securities that were held in our trading portfolio as of December 31, 2012.financial statement disclosures.

6162


Table of Contents

Note 54 – AFS Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows as of December 31:31:
20132014

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$24,860
 $7
 $1,122
 $23,745
$24,597
 $10
 $471
 $24,136
States and political subdivisions200,323
 5,212
 3,547
 201,988
209,153
 6,986
 794
 215,345
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 623
 2,577
3,200
 
 581
 2,619
Preferred stocks6,800
 20
 993
 5,827
6,800
 31
 691
 6,140
Mortgage-backed securities147,292
 657
 3,834
 144,115
165,888
 2,042
 1,004
 166,926
Collateralized mortgage obligations135,139
 1,016
 2,345
 133,810
152,255
 1,533
 1,420
 152,368
Total$517,614
 $6,912
 $12,464

$512,062
$561,893
 $10,602
 $4,961
 $567,534
20122013

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$25,668
 $108
 $
 $25,776
$24,860
 $7
 $1,122
 $23,745
States and political subdivisions174,118
 9,190
 565
 182,743
200,323
 5,212
 3,547
 201,988
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 422
 2,778
3,200
 
 623
 2,577
Preferred stocks6,800
 
 437
 6,363
6,800
 20
 993
 5,827
Mortgage-backed securities152,256
 3,199
 110
 155,345
147,292
 657
 3,834
 144,115
Collateralized mortgage obligations128,378
 2,627
 
 131,005
135,139
 1,016
 2,345
 133,810
Total$490,420
 $15,124
 $1,534
 $504,010
$517,614
 $6,912
 $12,464
 $512,062
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20132014 are as follows:
Maturing Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities  Maturing Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities  

Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 TotalDue in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Total
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $72
 $24,788
 $
 $
 $24,860
$
 $19,068
 $5,529
 $
 $
 $24,597
States and political subdivisions930
 37,672
 96,749
 64,972
 
 200,323
13,943
 56,317
 97,295
 41,598
 
 209,153
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200

 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
Preferred stocks
 
 
 
 6,800
 6,800

 
 
 
 6,800
 6,800
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 147,292
 147,292

 
 
 
 165,888
 165,888
Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
 
 
 135,139
 135,139

 
 
 
 152,255
 152,255
Total amortized cost$930
 $37,744
 $121,537
 $64,972
 $292,431
 $517,614
$13,943
 $75,385
 $102,824
 $41,598
 $328,143
 $561,893
Fair value$961
 $38,867
 $122,637
 $63,268
 $286,329
 $512,062
$13,975
 $76,994
 $105,990
 $42,522
 $328,053
 $567,534
Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
As the auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks have continual call dates, they are not reported by a specific maturity group. Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.

6263


Table of Contents

A summary of the sales activity related to sales of AFS securities was as follows during the years ended December 31:31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities$16,229
 $40,677
 $8,877
$13,362
 $16,229
 $40,677
Gross realized gains (losses)$171
 $1,119
 $3
$97
 $171
 $1,119
Applicable income tax expense (benefit)$58
 $380
 $1
$33
 $58
 $380
The cost basis used to determine the realized gains or losses of AFS securities sold was the amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.
Information pertaining to AFS securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:
20132014
Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$1,122
 $22,873
 $
 $
 $1,122
$
 $
 $471
 $23,525
 $471
States and political subdivisions2,566
 42,593
 981
 6,115
 3,547
48
 5,323
 746
 17,416
 794
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 623
 2,577
 623

 
 581
 2,619
 581
Preferred stocks
 
 993
 2,807
 993

 
 691
 3,109
 691
Mortgage-backed securities2,424
 101,816
 1,410
 21,662
 3,834
5
 9,456
 999
 52,407
 1,004
Collateralized mortgage obligations2,345
 84,478
 
 
 2,345
105
 29,435
 1,315
 39,540
 1,420
Total$8,457
 $251,760
 $4,007
 $33,161
 $12,464
$158
 $44,214
 $4,803
 $138,616
 $4,961
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  182
   19
 201
  22
   72
 94
20122013
Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$1,122
 $22,873
 $
 $
 $1,122
States and political subdivisions$80
 $5,019
 $485
 $2,352
 $565
2,566
 42,593
 981
 6,115
 3,547
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 422
 2,778
 422

 
 623
 2,577
 623
Preferred stocks
 
 437
 3,363
 437

 
 993
 2,807
 993
Mortgage-backed securities110
 25,499
 
 
 110
2,424
 101,816
 1,410
 21,662
 3,834
Collateralized mortgage obligations2,345
 84,478
 
 
 2,345
Total$190
 $30,518
 $1,344
 $8,493
 $1,534
$8,457
 $251,760
 $4,007
 $33,161
 $12,464
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  15
   6
 21
  182
   19
 201
As of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, we conducted an analysis to determine whether any securities currently in an unrealized loss position, should be other-than-temporarily impaired. Such analyses considered, among other factors, the following criteria:
Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
Is it probable the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?
Is it more likely than not that we will have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?
Has the duration of the investment been extended?
During the three month period ended March 31, 2012,, we had one state issued student loan auction rate AFS investment security (which is included in states and political subdivisions) that was downgraded by Moody's from A3 to Caa3. As a result of this downgrade, we engaged the services of an independent investment valuation firm to estimate the amount of credit losses (if

64



(if any) related to this particular issue as of March 31, 2012.2012. The evaluation calculated a range of estimated credit losses utilizing two different bifurcation methods:
1) Discounted Cash Flow Method
2) Credit Yield Analysis Method

63

Table of Contents

The two methods were then weighted, with a higher weighting applied to the Discounted Cash Flow Method,, to determine the estimated credit related impairment. As a result of this analysis, we recognized an OTTI of $282$282 in earnings in the three month period ended March 31, 2012.2012.
A summary of key valuation assumptions used in the aforementioned analysis as of March 31, 2012,, follows:
 Discounted Cash Flow Method
Ratings 
FitchNot Rated
Moody'sCaa3
S&PA
SenioritySenior
Discount rateLIBOR + 6.35%
  
 Credit Yield Analysis Method
Credit discount rateLIBOR + 4.00%
Average observed discounts based on closed transactions14.00%
To test for additional impairment of this security as of December 31, 20132014, we obtained another investment valuation (from the same firm engaged to perform the initial valuation as of March 31, 2012)2012) as of December 31, 20132014. Based on our analysis, no additional OTTI was indicated as of December 31, 20132014.
The following table provides a roll-forward of credit related impairment recognized in earnings for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Balance at beginning of year$282
 $
 $
$282
 $282
 $
Additions to credit losses for which no previous OTTI was recognized
 282
 

 
 282
Balance at end of year$282
 $282
 $
$282
 $282
 $282
Based on our analysis using the above criteria,analyses, the fact that we have asserted that we do not have the intent to sell AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, and considering it is unlikely that we will have to sell AFS securities in an unrealized loss position before recovery of their cost basis, we do not believe that the values of any other AFS securities are other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 20132014, or December 31, 20122013.
Note 65 – Loans and ALLL
We grant commercial, agricultural, residential real estate, and consumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, light manufacturing, retail, gaming, tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of our consumer and residential real estate loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees; a portion of loans are unsecured.
Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold in our portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.
The accrual of interest on commercial, agricultural, and residential real estate loans is typically discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection. Upon transferring the loans

65


Table of Contents

to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge-offs are necessary. Consumer loans are typically charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the ALLL. Loans are typically returned to accrual status after six months months of continuous performance. For impaired loans not

64

Table of Contents

classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.
Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, farmland and agricultural production, and states and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is often dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business. We minimize our risk by limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one borrower to $12,50015,000. Borrowers with credit needs of more than $12,50015,000 are serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans generally require loan-to-value limits of less than 80%. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, we may require the borrower to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, we require annual financial statements, prepare cash flow analyses, and review credit reports as deemed necessary.
We offer adjustable rate mortgages, fixed rate balloon mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate mortgageresidential real estate loans which typically have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. Fixed rate residential real estate loans with an amortization of greater than 15 years are generally sold upon origination to Freddie Mac. Fixed rate residential real estate loans with an amortization of 15 years or less may be held in our portfolio held for future sale, or sold to Freddie Mac upon origination. We consider the direction of interest rates, the sensitivity of our balance sheet to changes in interest rates, and overall loan demand to determine whether or not to sell these loans to Freddie Mac.
Our lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on residential real estate loans to 95% of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, with the condition that private mortgage insurance is required on loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%. Substantially all loans upon origination have a loan to value ratio of less than 80%. Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans include: evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments, the value of the property securing the loan, ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed 28% of a borrower’s gross income, all debt servicing does not exceed 36% of income, acceptable credit reports, verification of employment, income, and financial information. Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed internally. All mortgage loan requests are reviewed by our mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market automated underwriting system; loans in excess of $400500 require the approval of our Internal Loan Committee, the Executive Loan Committee, the Board of Directors’ Loan Committee, or the Board of Directors.
Consumer loans include automobile loans, secured and unsecured personal loans, and overdraft protection related loans. Loans are amortized generally for a period of up to 6 years.12 years based on the age and value of the underlying collateral. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value. No consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.
The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when we believe the uncollectability of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL.
The ALLL is evaluated on a regular basis and is based upon a periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the ALLL are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the net realizableloan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral, or the net present value of the projected payment stream and our recorded investment.less cost to sell. Historical loss allocations were calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio over the preceding five years. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that we believe affect our estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

6566


Table of Contents

A summary of changes in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:
 Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2013

Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2013$6,862
 $407
 $3,627
 $666
 $374
 $11,936
Loans charged-off(895) (12) (1,004) (429) 
 (2,340)
Recoveries363
 
 181
 249
 
 793
Provision for loan losses(282) 39
 1,041
 153
 160
 1,111
December 31, 2013$6,048
 $434
 $3,845
 $639
 $534
 $11,500

Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2014$6,048
 $434
 $3,845
 $639
 $534
 $11,500
Charge-offs(559) (31) (722) (316) 
 (1,628)
Recoveries550
 
 197
 149
 
 896
Provision for loan losses(2,216) (187) 918
 173
 644
 (668)
December 31, 2014$3,823
 $216
 $4,238
 $645
 $1,178
 $10,100

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2014
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$1,283
 $
 $2,143
 $1
 $
 $3,427
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,540
 216
 2,095
 644
 1,178
 6,673
Total$3,823
 $216
 $4,238
 $645
 $1,178
 $10,100
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$12,029
 $1,595
 $12,160
 $64
   $25,848
Collectively evaluated for impairment419,932
 103,126
 252,435
 32,241
   807,734
Total$431,961
 $104,721
 $264,595
 $32,305
   $833,582
 Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2013

Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2013$6,862
 $407
 $3,627
 $666
 $374
 $11,936
Charge-offs(895) (12) (1,004) (429) 
 (2,340)
Recoveries363
 
 181
 249
 
 793
Provision for loan losses(282) 39
 1,041
 153
 160
 1,111
December 31, 2013$6,048
 $434
 $3,845
 $639
 $534
 $11,500

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2013
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$2,035
 $30
 $2,287
 $
 $
 $4,352
Collectively evaluated for impairment4,013
 404
 1,558
 639
 534
 7,148
Total$6,048
 $434
 $3,845
 $639
 $534
 $11,500
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$13,816
 $1,538
 $14,302
 $119
   $29,775
Collectively evaluated for impairment378,288
 91,051
 275,629
 33,294
   778,262
Total$392,104
 $92,589
 $289,931
 $33,413
   $808,037
 Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2012

Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2012$6,284
 $1,003
 $2,980
 $633
 $1,475
 $12,375
Loans charged-off(1,672) 
 (1,142) (542) 
 (3,356)
Recoveries240
 
 122
 255
 
 617
Provision for loan losses2,010
 (596) 1,667
 320
 (1,101) 2,300
December 31, 2012$6,862
 $407
 $3,627
 $666
 $374
 $11,936
 Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2012
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$2,050
 $91
 $1,796
 $
 $
 $3,937
Collectively evaluated for impairment4,812
 316
 1,831
 666
 374
 7,999
Total$6,862
 $407
 $3,627
 $666
 $374
 $11,936
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$14,456
 $723
 $10,704
 $75
   $25,958
Collectively evaluated for impairment357,049
 82,883
 273,444
 33,419
   746,795
Total$371,505

$83,606
 $284,148
 $33,494
   $772,753

6667


Table of Contents

The following table displays the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit risk ratings as of December 31:31:
20132014
Commercial AgriculturalCommercial Agricultural

Real Estate Other Total Real Estate Other TotalReal Estate Other Total Real Estate Other Total
Rating          
           
1 - Excellent$
 $492
 $492
 $
 $
 $
2 - High quality$18,671
 $14,461
 $33,132
 $3,527
 $3,235
 $6,762
13,620
 14,423
 28,043
 5,806
 3,582
 9,388
3 - High satisfactory91,323
 39,403
 130,726
 26,015
 17,000
 43,015
94,556
 51,230
 145,786
 28,715
 12,170
 40,885
4 - Low satisfactory149,921
 43,809
 193,730
 26,874
 10,902
 37,776
184,000
 49,869
 233,869
 33,361
 17,560
 50,921
5 - Special mention13,747
 1,843
 15,590
 1,609
 922
 2,531
8,456
 1,322
 9,778
 1,607
 65
 1,672
6 - Substandard16,974
 473
 17,447
 1,232
 1,273
 2,505
11,055
 123
 11,178
 1,602
 147
 1,749
7 - Vulnerable1,041
 238
 1,279
 
 
 
2,687
 116
 2,803
 106
 
 106
8 - Doubtful183
 17
 200
 
 
 

 12
 12
 
 
 
Total$291,860
 $100,244
 $392,104
 $59,257
 $33,332
 $92,589
$314,374
 $117,587
 $431,961
 $71,197
 $33,524
 $104,721
20122013
Commercial AgriculturalCommercial Agricultural

Real Estate Other Total Real Estate Other TotalReal Estate Other Total Real Estate Other Total
Rating                      
1 - Excellent$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
2 - High quality$25,209
 $15,536
 $40,745
 $2,955
 $2,313
 $5,268
18,671
 14,461
 33,132
 3,527
 3,235
 6,762
3 - High satisfactory83,805
 28,974
 112,779
 16,972
 11,886
 28,858
91,323
 39,403
 130,726
 26,015
 17,000
 43,015
4 - Low satisfactory127,423
 45,143
 172,566
 27,291
 15,437
 42,728
149,921
 43,809
 193,730
 26,874
 10,902
 37,776
5 - Special mention16,046
 1,692
 17,738
 1,008
 3,191
 4,199
13,747
 1,843
 15,590
 1,609
 922
 2,531
6 - Substandard20,029
 2,224
 22,253
 1,167
 1,217
 2,384
16,974
 473
 17,447
 1,232
 1,273
 2,505
7 - Vulnerable1,512
 2,294
 3,806
 
 
 
1,041
 238
 1,279
 
 
 
8 - Doubtful1,596
 22
 1,618
 
 169
 169
183
 17
 200
 
 
 
Total$275,620
 $95,885
 $371,505
 $49,393
 $34,213
 $83,606
$291,860
 $100,244
 $392,104
 $59,257
 $33,332
 $92,589
Internally assigned credit risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned credit risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:
1. EXCELLENT – Substantially Risk Free
Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:
High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.
Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.
Experienced management, with management succession in place.
Secured by cash.
2. HIGH QUALITY – Limited Risk
Credit with sound financial condition and has a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:
Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.
Ability to meet all obligations when due.
Management with successful track record.
Steady and satisfactory earnings history.
If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.
Access to alternative financing.
Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.
If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.

6768


Table of Contents

3.HIGH SATISFACTORY – Reasonable Risk
Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:
Working capital adequate to support operations.
Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.
Management experience and depth appear favorable.
Loan performing according to terms.
If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.
4. LOW SATISFACTORY – Acceptable Risk
Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:
Would include most start-up businesses.
Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency – may have been 10-30 days slow within the past year.
Management’s abilities are apparent, yet unproven.
Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.
Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.
If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.
Adequate cash flow to service debt, but coverage is low.
To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.
5. SPECIAL MENTION – Criticized
Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:
Downward trend in sales, profit levels, and margins.
Impaired working capital position.
Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.
Loan delinquency (30-60 days) and overdrafts may occur.
Shrinking equity cushion.
Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.
Management abilities are questionable.
Weak industry conditions.
Litigation pending against the borrower.
Collateral or guaranty offers limited protection.
Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.
6. SUBSTANDARD – Classified
Credit where the borrower’s current net worth, paying capacity, and value of the collateral pledged is inadequate. There is a distinct possibility that we will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:
Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.
Deteriorating liquidity.
Serious management problems or internal fraud.
Original repayment terms liberalized.
Likelihood of bankruptcy.
Inability to access other funding sources.
Reliance on secondary source of repayment.
Litigation filed against borrower.
Collateral provides little or no value.
Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.
Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.

6869


Table of Contents

7.VULNERABLE – Classified
Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing on nonaccrual. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:
Insufficient cash flow to service debt.
Minimal or no payments being received.
Limited options available to avoid the collection process.
Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.
8. DOUBTFUL – Workout
Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:
Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.
Seriously impaired cash flow.
Original repayment terms materially altered.
Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.
Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.
Collection process has begun.
Bankruptcy petition has been filed.
Judgments have been filed.
Portion of the loan balance has been charged-off.
Our primary credit quality indicator for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the past due and current loans as of December 31:31:
20132014
Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual Current Total30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual Current Total
Commercial                          
Commercial real estate$1,226
 $296
 $
 $1,136
 $2,658
 $289,202
 $291,860
$1,155
 $282
 $
 $2,764
 $4,201
 $310,173
 $314,374
Commercial other368
 15
 13
 238
 634
 99,610
 100,244
153
 24
 2
 116
 295
 117,292
 117,587
Total commercial1,594
 311
 13
 1,374
 3,292
 388,812
 392,104
1,308
 306
 2
 2,880
 4,496
 427,465
 431,961
Agricultural                          
Agricultural real estate34
 295
 
 
 329
 58,928
 59,257
101
 
 
 106
 207
 70,990
 71,197
Agricultural other
 
 
 
 
 33,332
 33,332
102
 
 
 
 102
 33,422
 33,524
Total agricultural34
 295
 
 
 329
 92,260
 92,589
203
 
 
 106
 309
 104,412
 104,721
Residential real estate                          
Senior liens3,441
 986
 129
 1,765
 6,321
 229,865
 236,186
1,821
 425
 146
 668
 3,060
 210,138
 213,198
Junior liens408
 44
 
 29
 481
 13,074
 13,555
235
 18
 
 130
 383
 10,750
 11,133
Home equity lines of credit181
 
 
 25
 206
 39,984
 40,190
468
 20
 
 250
 738
 39,526
 40,264
Total residential real estate4,030
 1,030
 129
 1,819
 7,008
 282,923
 289,931
2,524
 463
 146
 1,048
 4,181
 260,414
 264,595
Consumer                          
Secured167
 11
 
 50
 228
 28,444
 28,672
107
 2
 
 10
 119
 28,229
 28,348
Unsecured25
 5
 
 1
 31
 4,710
 4,741
19
 
 
 
 19
 3,938
 3,957
Total consumer192
 16
 
 51
 259
 33,154
 33,413
126
 2
 
 10
 138
 32,167
 32,305
Total$5,850
 $1,652
 $142
 $3,244
 $10,888
 $797,149
 $808,037
$4,161
 $771
 $148
 $4,044
 $9,124
 $824,458
 $833,582

6970


Table of Contents

20122013
Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual Current Total30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual Current Total
Commercial                          
Commercial real estate$1,304
 $161
 $63
 $2,544
 $4,072
 $271,548
 $275,620
$1,226
 $296
 $
 $1,136
 $2,658
 $289,202
 $291,860
Commercial other606
 
 40
 2,294
 2,940
 92,945
 95,885
368
 15
 13
 238
 634
 99,610
 100,244
Total commercial1,910
 161
 103
 4,838
 7,012
 364,493
 371,505
1,594
 311
 13
 1,374
 3,292
 388,812
 392,104
Agricultural                          
Agricultural real estate
 
 
 
 
 49,393
 49,393
34
 295
 
 
 329
 58,928
 59,257
Agricultural other90
 
 
 169
 259
 33,954
 34,213

 
 
 
 
 33,332
 33,332
Total agricultural90
 
 
 169
 259
 83,347
 83,606
34
 295
 
 
 329
 92,260
 92,589
Residential real estate                          
Senior liens2,000
 346
 320
 2,064
 4,730
 223,532
 228,262
3,441
 986
 129
 1,765
 6,321
 229,865
 236,186
Junior liens232
 
 
 50
 282
 16,207
 16,489
408
 44
 
 29
 481
 13,074
 13,555
Home equity lines of credit237
 
 
 182
 419
 38,978
 39,397
181
 
 
 25
 206
 39,984
 40,190
Total residential real estate2,469
 346
 320
 2,296
 5,431
 278,717
 284,148
4,030
 1,030
 129
 1,819
 7,008
 282,923
 289,931
Consumer                          
Secured127
 33
 4
 
 164
 28,118
 28,282
167
 11
 
 50
 228
 28,444
 28,672
Unsecured31
 3
 1
 
 35
 5,177
 5,212
25
 5
 
 1
 31
 4,710
 4,741
Total consumer158
 36
 5
 
 199
 33,295
 33,494
192
 16
 
 51
 259
 33,154
 33,413
Total$4,627
 $543
 $428
 $7,303
 $12,901
 $759,852
 $772,753
$5,850
 $1,652
 $142
 $3,244
 $10,888
 $797,149
 $808,037
Impaired Loans
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.
There has been a charge-off of its principal balance (in whole or in part),;
2.
The loan has been classified as a TDR,; or
3.
The loan is in nonaccrual status.
Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for residential real estate and consumer loans by comparing the loan’s outstandingunpaid principal balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate.

7071


Table of Contents

We do not recognize interest income on impaired loans in nonaccrual status. For impaired loans not in nonaccrual status, interest income is recognized daily, as earned, according to the terms of the loan agreement. The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of, and for the years ended, December 31:31:
20132014
Outstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income RecognizedOutstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance                  
Commercial real estate$6,748
 $6,888
 $1,915
 $7,256
 $400
$7,115
 $7,234
 $1,279
 $6,958
 $392
Commercial other521
 521
 120
 879
 51
609
 828
 4
 704
 51
Agricultural real estate90
 90
 30
 91
 4

 
 
 85
 
Agricultural other
 
 
 53
 

 
 
 
 
Residential real estate senior liens14,061
 15,315
 2,278
 11,111
 442
11,645
 12,782
 2,015
 12,713
 509
Residential real estate junior liens48
 64
 9
 80
 2
265
 275
 53
 133
 
Home equity lines of credit250
 650
 75
 229
 21
Consumer secured54
 54
 1
 68
 4
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance21,468
 22,878
 4,352
 19,470
 899
19,938
 21,823
 3,427
 20,890
 977
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance                  
Commercial real estate5,622
 6,499
   4,312
 337
4,116
 4,462
   4,997
 309
Commercial other925
 1,035
   989
 83
189
 212
   360
 17
Agricultural real estate1,370
 1,370
   320
 28
1,529
 1,529
   1,455
 89
Agricultural other78
 198
   357
 (7)66
 186
   100
 30
Home equity lines of credit193
 493
   180
 16

 
   24
 
Consumer secured119
 148
   72
 2
10
 10
   6
 
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance8,307
 9,743
   6,230
 459
5,910
 6,399
 

 6,942
 445
Impaired loans                  
Commercial13,816
 14,943
 2,035
 13,436
 871
12,029
 12,736
 1,283
 13,019
 769
Agricultural1,538
 1,658
 30
 821
 25
1,595
 1,715
 
 1,640
 119
Residential real estate14,302
 15,872
 2,287
 11,371
 460
12,160
 13,707
 2,143
 13,099
 530
Consumer119
 148
 
 72
 2
64
 64
 1
 74
 4
Total impaired loans$29,775
 $32,621
 $4,352
 $25,700
 $1,358
$25,848
 $28,222
 $3,427
 $27,832
 $1,422

7172


Table of Contents

20122013
Outstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income RecognizedOutstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance                  
Commercial real estate$7,295
 $7,536
 $1,653
 $6,155
 $237
$6,748
 $6,888
 $1,915
 $7,256
 $400
Commercial other2,140
 2,140
 397
 1,437
 93
521
 521
 120
 879
 51
Agricultural real estate91
 91
 32
 413
 
90
 90
 30
 91
 4
Agricultural other420
 420
 59
 1,555
 54

 
 
 53
 
Residential real estate senior liens10,450
 11,672
 1,783
 8,861
 406
14,061
 15,315
 2,278
 11,111
 442
Residential real estate junior liens72
 118
 13
 134
 6
48
 64
 9
 80
 2
Home equity lines of credit
 
 
 
 
Consumer secured
 
 
 
 
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance20,468
 21,977
 3,937
 18,555
 796
21,468
 22,878
 4,352
 19,470
 899
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance                  
Commercial real estate3,749
 4,408
   5,867
 321
5,622
 6,499
   4,312
 337
Commercial other1,272
 1,433
   819
 87
925
 1,035
   989
 83
Agricultural real estate
 
   183
 
1,370
 1,370
   320
 28
Agricultural other212
 332
   201
 4
78
 198
   357
 (7)
Home equity lines of credit182
 482
   190
 16
193
 493
   180
 16
Consumer secured75
 84
   90
 6
119
 148
   72
 2
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance5,490
 6,739
   7,350
 434
8,307
 9,743
   6,230
 459
Impaired loans                  
Commercial14,456
 15,517
 2,050
 14,278
 738
13,816
 14,943
 2,035
 13,436
 871
Agricultural723
 843
 91
 2,352
 58
1,538
 1,658
 30
 821
 25
Residential real estate10,704
 12,272
 1,796
 9,185
 428
14,302
 15,872
 2,287
 11,371
 460
Consumer75
 84
 
 90
 6
119
 148
 
 72
 2
Total impaired loans$25,958
 $28,716
 $3,937
 $25,905
 $1,230
$29,775
 $32,621
 $4,352
 $25,700
 $1,358
As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,December 31, 2013, we had committed to advance $1340 and $9134, respectively, in connection with impaired loans, which include TDRs.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Loan modifications are considered to be TDRs when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.
Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:
1.Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.
2.Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for debtloans with similar risk characteristics.
3.Forbearance ofForgiving principal.
4.Forbearance ofForgiving accrued interest.
To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, factors we consider if:include:
1.The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.
2.The borrower would likely default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.
3.The borrower’s cash flow was insufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.
4.The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.
5.The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).

7273


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDRs granted in the years ended December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded InvestmentNumber of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial           
Commercial real estate
 $
 $
 1
 $912
 $792
Commercial other18
 5,299
 5,103
 28
 6,437
 6,437
9
 $1,533
 $1,533
 18
 $5,299
 $5,103
Total commercial18
 5,299
 5,103
 29
 7,349
 7,229
Agricultural other4
 1,379
 1,379
 7
 652
 652
1
 49
 49
 4
 1,379
 1,379
Residential real estate                      
Senior liens55
 6,069
 6,053
 29
 3,463
 3,463
15
 1,011
 1,011
 55
 6,069
 6,053
Junior liens1
 20
 20
 1
 22
 22
4
 233
 233
 1
 20
 20
Home equity lines of credit1
 160
 160
 
 
 
Total residential real estate56
 6,089
 6,073
 30
 3,485
 3,485
20
 1,404
 1,404
 56
 6,089
 6,073
Consumer                      
Secured1
 27
 27
 1
 
 

 
 
 1
 27
 27
Unsecured2
 34
 34
 
 
 
4
 18
 18
 2
 34
 34
Total consumer3
 61
 61
 1
 
 
4
 18
 18
 3
 61
 61
Total81
 $12,828
 $12,616
 67
 $11,486
 $11,366
34
 $3,004
 $3,004
 81
 $12,828
 $12,616
The following tables summarize concessions we granted to borrowers in financial difficulty in the years ended December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013

Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization PeriodBelow Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded InvestmentNumber of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial               
Commercial real estate
 $
 
 $
 
 $
 1
 $912
Commercial other12
 3,070
 6
 2,229
 25
 4,924
 3
 1,513
8
 $1,525
 1
 $8
 12
 $3,070
 6
 $2,229
Total commercial12
 3,070
 6
 2,229
 25
 4,924
 4
 2,425
Agricultural other4
 1,379
 
 
 6
 561
 1
 91

 
 1
 49
 4
 1,379
 
 
Residential real estate                              
Senior liens24
 1,904
 31
 4,165
 17
 1,779
 12
 1,684
3
 97
 12
 914
 24
 1,904
 31
 4,165
Junior liens
 
 1
 20
 
 
 1
 22
2
 152
 2
 81
 
 
 1
 20
Home equity lines of credit1
 160
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total residential real estate24
 1,904
 32
 4,185
 17
 1,779
 13
 1,706
6
 409
 14
 995
 24
 1,904
 32
 4,185
Consumer                              
Secured1
 27
 
 
 1
 
 
 

 
 
 
 1
 27
 
 
Unsecured1
 16
 1
 18
 
 
 
 
3
 15
 1
 3
 1
 16
 1
 18
Total Consumer2
 43
 1
 18
 1
 
 
 
3
 15
 1
 3
 2
 43
 1
 18
Total42
 $6,396
 39
 $6,432
 49
 $7,264
 18
 $4,222
17
 $1,949
 17
 $1,055
 42
 $6,396
 39
 $6,432
We did not restructure any loans through the forbearance ofby forgiving principal or accrued interest during 20132014 or 20122013.
Based on our historical loss experience, losses associated with TDRs are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the same loan segment. As such, TDRs, including TDRs that have been modified in the past 12 months that subsequently defaulted, are analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment.

7374


Table of Contents

Following is a summary of loans that defaulted in the years ended December 31,, which were modified within 12 months prior to the default date:
2013 20122014 2013
Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-off Recorded Upon Default Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-off Recorded Upon Default Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
 Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
 Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Commercial other
 $
 $
 $
 5
 $342
 $143
 $199
Residential real estate senior liens1
 62
 11
 51
 1
 47
 43
 4

 $
 $
 $
 1
 $62
 $11
 $51
Consumer secured
 
 
 
 1
 8
 8
 
Consumer unsecured1
 16
 16
 
 
 
 
 
2
 7
 7
 
 1
 16
 16
 
Total2
 $78
 $27
 $51
 7
 $397
 $194
 $203
2
 $7
 $7
 $
 2
 $78
 $27
 $51
The following is a summary of TDR loan balances as of December 31:31:
 2013 2012
TDRs$25,865
 $19,355
 2014 2013
TDRs$23,341
 $25,865
Note 76 – Premises and Equipment
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:

2013 20122014 2013
Land$5,429
 $5,435
$5,429
 $5,429
Buildings and improvements24,765
 22,705
25,441
 24,765
Furniture and equipment30,128
 29,755
31,011
 30,128
Total60,322
 57,895
61,881
 60,322
Less: accumulated depreciation34,603
 32,108
36,000
 34,603
Premises and equipment, net$25,719
 $25,787
$25,881
 $25,719
Depreciation expense amounted to $2,551, $2,556, and $2,417 in 2014, 2013, and $2,521 in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Note 87 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of goodwill was $45,618 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.
Identifiable intangible assets were as follows as of December 31:
 2013
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,373
 $4,680
 $693
 2014
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,373
 $4,863
 $510
 2012
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,373
 $4,459
 $914
 2013
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,373
 $4,680
 $693
Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was $183, $221, and $260 in 2014, 2013, and $299 in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

7475


Table of Contents

Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable intangibles for each of the next five years succeeding December 31, 2013,2014, and thereafter is as follows:
2014$183

Estimated Amortization Expense
2015145
$145
2016106
106
201774
74
201862
62
201949
Thereafter123
74
Total$693
$510
Note 98 – Deposits
Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years, and thereafter, are as follows:
2014$207,278

Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits
201581,413
$217,505
201658,627
75,192
201746,336
56,391
201839,214
50,550
201922,901
Thereafter17,144
17,723
Total$450,012
$440,262
Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $2,920 in 2014, $3,203 in 2013 and $3,854 in 2012, and $4,302 in 2011.2012.
Note 109 – Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Amount Rate Amount RateAmount Rate Amount Rate
FHLB advances$162,000
 2.02% $152,000
 2.05%$192,000
 2.05% $162,000
 2.02%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates106,025
 0.13% 66,147
 0.15%95,070
 0.14% 106,025
 0.13%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates11,301
 3.30% 16,284
 3.57%439
 3.25% 11,301
 3.30%
Federal funds purchased
 
 6,570
 0.50%2,200
 0.50% 
 
Total$279,326
 1.35% $241,001
 1.59%$289,709
 1.41% $279,326
 1.35%
The FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on all qualified 1-4 family residential real estate loans, and certain mortgage-backedAFS securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations. Advances are also secured by our holdings of FHLB stock. As of December 31, 2013, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $127,748, based on assets pledged as collateral. During the first quarter of 2013 and 2012, we reduced funding costs by modifying the term of $30,000 and $60,000, respectively, of FHLB advances.

7576


Table of Contents

The following table lists the maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances are as follows as of December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013

Amount Rate Amount RateAmount Rate Amount Rate
Fixed rate advances due 2014$10,000
 0.48% $10,000
 0.48%$
 
 $10,000
 0.48%
Fixed rate advances due 201532,000
 0.84% 42,000
 1.12%42,000
 0.72% 32,000
 0.84%
Fixed rate advances due 201610,000
 2.15% 10,000
 2.15%10,000
 2.15% 10,000
 2.15%
Fixed rate advances due 201730,000
 1.95% 40,000
 2.15%30,000
 1.95% 30,000
 1.95%
Fixed rate advances due 201840,000
 2.35% 20,000
 2.86%40,000
 2.35% 40,000
 2.35%
Fixed rate advances due 201920,000
 3.11% 20,000
 3.73%20,000
 3.11% 20,000
 3.11%
Fixed rate advances due 202010,000
 1.98% 10,000
 1.98%10,000
 1.98% 10,000
 1.98%
Fixed rate advances due 202130,000
 2.26% 
 
Fixed rate advances due 202310,000
 3.90% 
 
10,000
 3.90% 10,000
 3.90%
Total$162,000
 2.02% $152,000
 2.05%$192,000
 2.05% $162,000
 2.02%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchaseborrowings and are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a fair value of $148,930135,222 and $143,322148,930 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. Such securities remain under our control. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.
The following table lists the maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates are as follows at December 31:
2013 20122014 2013
Amount Rate Amount RateAmount Rate Amount Rate
Repurchase agreements due 2013$
 
 $5,000
 4.51%
Repurchase agreements due 201410,876
 3.30% 10,872
 3.15%$
 
 $10,876
 3.30%
Repurchase agreements due 2015425
 3.25% 412
 3.25%439
 3.25% 425
 3.25%
Total$11,301
 3.30% $16,284
 3.57%$439
 3.25% $11,301
 3.30%
Securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount Window advances generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. The following table provides a summary of short-termsecurities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount Window advances borrowings for the years ended December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the PeriodMaximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates$106,025
 $74,602
 0.15% $66,117
 $57,466
 0.20%$95,070
 $91,422
 0.13% $106,025
 $74,602
 0.15%
Federal funds purchased13,700
 4,445
 0.61% 17,900
 3,836
 0.47%17,700
 4,589
 0.48% 13,700
 4,445
 0.61%
We had pledged certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, AFS securities, and 1-4 family residential real estate loans in the following amounts at December 31:

2014 2013
Pledged to secure borrowed funds$324,584
 $320,173
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements135,222
 148,930
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law19,851
 20,922
Total$479,657
 $490,025
As of December 31, 2014:, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional
 2013 2012
Pledged to secure borrowed funds$320,173
 $308,628
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements148,930
 143,322
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law20,922
 22,955
Total$490,025
 $474,905
$112,301, based on assets pledged as collateral. We had no investment securities that are restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.


7677


Table of Contents

Note 1110 – Other Noninterest Expenses
A summary of expenses included in other noninterest expenses is as follows for the years ended December 31:31:

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Marketing and community relations$1,131
 $1,965
 $1,174
$1,431
 $1,131
 $1,965
FDIC insurance premiums1,082
 864
 1,086
842
 1,082
 864
Directors fees819
 885
 842
Audit and related fees738
 711
 714
809
 738
 711
Director fees775
 819
 885
Education and travel502
 588
 526
625
 502
 588
Postage and freight397
 387
 389
Printing and supplies367
 396
 424
Loan underwriting fees423
 403
 331
361
 423
 403
Printing and supplies396
 424
 405
Postage and freight387
 389
 388
Consulting fees349
 315
 482
Legal fees359
 268
 302
320
 359
 268
Consulting fees315
 482
 386
Other losses250
 109
 300
Amortization of deposit premium221
 260
 299
183
 221
 260
State taxes171
 140
 187
Foreclosed asset and collection211
 202
 576
122
 211
 202
State taxes140
 187
 57
Other losses109
 300
 54
All other1,517
 1,123
 1,131
1,628
 1,517
 1,123
Total other$8,350
 $9,051
 $8,271
$8,630
 $8,350
 $9,051
Note 1211 – Federal Income Taxes
Components of the consolidated provision for federal income taxes are as follows for the years ended December 31:31:

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Currently payable$3,404
 $1,747
 $965
$2,159
 $3,404
 $1,747
Deferred (benefit) expense(1,208) 616
 389
185
 (1,208) 616
Income tax expense$2,196
 $2,363
 $1,354
$2,344
 $2,196
 $2,363

The reconciliation of the provision for federal income taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate of 34% of income before federal income tax expense is as follows for the yearsyear ended December 31:31:

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate$5,000
 $4,953
 $3,932
$5,463
 $5,000
 $4,953
Effect of nontaxable income          
Interest income on tax exempt municipal securities(1,746) (1,675) (1,687)(1,999) (1,746) (1,675)
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies(249) (238) (207)(255) (249) (238)
Other(154) (147) (65)(263) (154) (147)
Total effect of nontaxable income(2,149) (2,060) (1,959)(2,517) (2,149) (2,060)
Effect of nondeductible expenses156
 146
 137
Effect of tax credits(801) (667) (793)(758) (801) (667)
Effect of nondeductible expenses146
 137
 174
Federal income tax expense$2,196
 $2,363
 $1,354
$2,344
 $2,196
 $2,363

7778


Table of Contents

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for federal income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Deferred tax assets      
Allowance for loan losses$2,988
 $3,133
$2,507
 $2,988
Deferred directors’ fees2,313
 2,100
2,414
 2,313
Employee benefit plans257
 189
255
 257
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses971
 892
1,037
 971
Net unrealized losses on trading securities360
 351
361
 360
Net unrecognized actuarial losses on pension plan1,100
 1,891
1,962
 1,100
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities1,345
 

 1,345
Life insurance death benefit payable804
 804
804
 804
Alternative minimum tax729
 729
650
 729
Other321
 195
203
 321
Total deferred tax assets11,188
 10,284
10,193
 11,188
Deferred tax liabilities      
Prepaid pension cost1,023
 1,021
989
 1,023
Premises and equipment449
 724
247
 449
Accretion on securities42
 37
49
 42
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses1,229
 1,203
1,229
 1,229
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
 4,912
2,339
 
Other547
 1,163
449
 547
Total deferred tax liabilities3,290
 9,060
5,302
 3,290
Net deferred tax assets$7,898
 $1,224
$4,891
 $7,898
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax; however, we are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2010.2011. There are no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months.
We recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. We do not have any amounts accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and we not aware of any claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.
Note 1312 – Off-Balance-Sheet Activities
Credit-Related Financial Instruments
We are party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and IRR in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in a particular class of financial instrument.
December 31December 31
2013 20122014 2013
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit$121,959
 $115,233
$116,935
 $121,959
Commercial and standby letters of credit4,169
 3,935
4,985
 4,169
Commitments to grant loans29,096
 40,507
13,988
 29,096

78

Table of Contents

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These commitments may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

79


Table of Contents

Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. While we consider standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to grant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer. Commitments to grant loans include loans committed to be sold to the secondary market.
Our exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit could be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in deciding to make these commitments as we do for extending loans to customers. No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.
Note 1413 – On-Balance Sheet Activities
Derivative Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. We enter into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A mortgage loan commitment binds us to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the rate lock.
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose us to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increase. The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock commitments was $182$632 and $1,912$182 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.
Forward Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, we utilize both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loan that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.
With a “mandatory delivery” contract, we commit to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If we fail to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, we are obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.
With a “best efforts” contract, we commit to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower).
We expect that these forward loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments. The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $1,286$1,533 and $5,545$1,286 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively.
The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by management and, accordingly, are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

7980


Table of Contents

Note 1514 – Commitments and Other Matters
Banking regulations require us to maintain cash reserve balances in currency or as deposits with the FRB. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the reserve balances amounted to $910$963 and $885,$910, respectively.
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation. At December 31, 2013,2014, substantially all of the Bank’s assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Consequently, Bank dividends are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current year’s retained net income plus retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to common stock. At January 1, 2014,2015, the amount available to the Corporation for dividends from the Bank, without regulatory approval, was approximately $19,500.$22,800.
Note 1615 – Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the FRB and the FDIC that if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, capital, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FRB and the FDIC about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). We believe, as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, that we met all capital adequacy requirements.
As of December 31, 2013,2014, the most recent notifications from the FRB and the FDIC categorized us as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notifications that we believe has changed our categories. Our actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.
Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount RatioAmount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2013           
December 31, 2014           
Total capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank$120,067
 13.84% $69,390
 8.00% $86,738
 10.00%$128,074
 14.16% $72,341
 8.00% $90,426
 10.00%
Consolidated131,398
 14.92
 70,452
 8.00
 N/A
 N/A
138,820
 15.18
 73,170
 8.00
 N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank109,217
 12.59
 34,695
 4.00
 52,043
 6.00
117,974
 13.05
 36,170
 4.00
 54,255
 6.00
Consolidated120,384
 13.67
 35,226
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
128,720
 14.08
 36,585
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets                      
Isabella Bank109,217
 7.75
 56,403
 4.00
 70,504
 5.00
117,974
 7.96
 59,297
 4.00
 74,121
 5.00
Consolidated120,384
 8.46
 56,932
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
128,720
 8.59
 59,908
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A

8081


Table of Contents

Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount RatioAmount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2012           
December 31, 2013           
Total capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank$112,498
 13.40% $67,150
 8.00% $83,937
 10.00%$120,067
 13.84% $69,390
 8.00% $86,738
 10.00%
Consolidated123,388
 14.48
 68,161
 8.00
 N/A
 N/A
131,398
 14.92
 70,452
 8.00
 N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets                      
Isabella Bank101,988
 12.15
 33,575
 4.00
 50,362
 6.00
109,217
 12.59
 34,695
 4.00
 52,043
 6.00
Consolidated112,722
 13.23
 34,080
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
120,384
 13.67
 35,226
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets                      
Isabella Bank101,988
 7.57
 53,916
 4.00
 67,395
 5.00
109,217
 7.75
 56,403
 4.00
 70,504
 5.00
Consolidated112,722
 8.29
 54,411
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
120,384
 8.46
 56,932
 4.00
 N/A
 N/A
Note 1716 – Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
We have a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50%100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The plan was amended in 2013 to provide a matching safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees equal to 100% of the first 5.0% of an employee's compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor matching contributions.
For 2012, and 2011, we made a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees were 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and were 0% vested through their first two years of employment and were 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching contributions.
For 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011,2012, expenses attributable to the Plan were $655, $608, and $662, and $652, respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective March 1, 2007.2007. As a result of the curtailment, future salary increases are no longer considered (the projected benefit obligation is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation), and plan benefits are based on years of service and the individual employee’s five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service through March 1, 2007.2007.

8182


Table of Contents

Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net amount recognized on our consolidated balance sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31,, are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Change in benefit obligation      
Benefit obligation, January 1$12,209
 $11,334
$10,732
 $12,209
Interest cost450
 470
486
 450
Actuarial (gain) loss(1,294) 888
3,049
 (1,294)
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(633) (483)(1,017) (633)
Benefit obligation, December 3110,732
 12,209
13,250
 10,732
Change in plan assets      
Fair value of plan assets, January 19,650
 8,603
10,508
 9,650
Investment return1,276
 778
699
 1,276
Contributions215
 752
200
 215
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(633) (483)(1,017) (633)
Fair value of plan assets, December 3110,508
 9,650
10,390
 10,508
Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included on the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest payable and other liabilities$(224) $(2,559)$(2,860) $(224)

2013 20122014 2013
Change in accrued pension benefit costs      
Accrued benefit cost at January 1$(2,559) $(2,731)$(224) $(2,559)
Contributions215
 752
200
 215
Net periodic benefit cost(208) (251)(300) (208)
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost2,328
 (329)(2,536) 2,328
Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31$(224) $(2,559)$(2,860) $(224)
Amounts recognized as a component of OCI consist of the following amounts during the years ended December 31:
 2013 2012 2011
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost$2,328
 $(329) $(1,971)
Tax effect(791) 111
 671
Net$1,537
 $(218) $(1,300)
We have recorded the funded status of the Plan in our consolidated balance sheets. We adjust the underfunded status in a liability account to reflect the current funded status of the plan. Our liability increased in 2014 as a result of changes in mortality tables and discount rates used to determine the current benefit obligation. Any gains or losses that arise during the year but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the years ended December 31:31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Interest cost on benefit obligation$450
 $470
 $507
$486
 $450
 $470
Expected return on plan assets(572) (511) (522)(615) (572) (511)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss330
 292
 153
169
 330
 292
Settlement loss260
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost$208
 $251
 $138
$300
 $208
 $251
During 2014, an additional settlement loss of $260 was recognized in connection with lump-sum benefits distributions. Many plan participants elect to receive their retirement benefit payments in the form of lump-sum settlements. Pro rata settlement losses, which can occasionally occur as a result of these lump sum distributions, are recognized only in years when the total of such distributions exceed the sum of the service and interest expense components of net periodic benefit cost.
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 20132014 includes net unrecognized pension costs before income taxes of $3,234,$5,770, of which $40$241 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2014.2015.
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the benefit obligation are as follows for the years ended December 31:31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Discount rate4.64% 3.75% 4.22%3.80% 4.64% 3.75%
Expected long-term rate of return6.00% 6.00% 6.00%6.00% 6.00% 6.00%

8283


Table of Contents

The actuarial weighted average assumptions used in determining the net periodic pension costs are as follows for the years ended December 31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Discount rate3.75% 4.22% 5.36%4.64% 3.75% 4.22%
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.00% 6.00% 6.00%6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.
The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of anticipated future long term rates of return on plan assets as measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:
Historical long term rates of return for broad asset classes.
Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
The general mix of assets held by the plan.
The stated investment policy for the plan.
The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment related expenses.
Plan Assets
Our overall investment strategy is to moderately grow the portfolio by investing 50% of the portfolio in equity securities and 50% in fixed income securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long term rate of return of 6.0%6.00%.  Equity securities primarily consist of the S&P 500 Index with a smaller allocation to the Small Cap and International Index.  Fixed income securities are invested in the Bond Market Index.  The Plan has appropriate assets invested in short term investments to meet near-term benefit payments.
The asset mix and the sector weighting of the investments are determined by our pension committee, which is comprised of members of our management. To manage the Plan, we retain a third party investment advisor to conduct consultations. We review the performance of the advisor at least annually.
The fair values of our pension plan assets by asset category were as follows as of December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013

Total (Level 2) Total (Level 2)Total (Level 2) Total (Level 2)
Short-term investments$142
 $142
 $80
 $80
$804
 $804
 $142
 $142
Common collective trusts              
Fixed income5,064
 5,064
 4,832
 4,832
4,738
 4,738
 5,064
 5,064
Equity investments5,302
 5,302
 4,738
 4,738
4,848
 4,848
 5,302
 5,302
Total$10,508
 $10,508
 $9,650
 $9,650
$10,390
 $10,390
 $10,508
 $10,508
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 20132014 and 2012:2013:
Short-term investments: Shares of a money market portfolio, which is valued using amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Common collective trusts: These investments are public investment securities valued using the NAV provided by a third party investment advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market.
We do not anticipate any contributions to the plan in 2014.2015.
The components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the year ending December 31, 2014:ending:
December 31, 2015
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$486
$493
Expected return on plan assets(615)(607)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss169
355
Net periodic benefit cost$40
$241

8384


Table of Contents

Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next ten years:
2014$518
Estimated Benefit Payments
20152015551
$535
20162016549
526
20172017577
555
20182018575
559
2019 - 20233,312
2019604
2020 - 20243,425
Equity Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan, our directors are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP Plan").Plan. Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of our common stock based on the fair value of a share of common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a participant’s account is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. DRIPDividend Reinvestment Plan shares are purchased on a monthly basis pursuant to the DRIPDividend Reinvestment Plan.
Distribution of deferred fees from the Directors Plan occurs when the participant retires from the boardBoard or upon the occurrence of certain other events. The participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution of all of the stock that is then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. All authorized but unissued shares of common stock are eligible for issuance under the Directors Plan. We may also purchase shares of common stock on the open market to meet our obligations under the Directors Plan.
We maintain the Rabbi Trust to fund the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which we may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although we may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust for any purpose other than meeting our obligations under the Directors Plan, the assets of the Rabbi Trust remain subject to the claims of our creditors and are included in the consolidated financial statements. We may contribute cash or common stock to the Rabbi Trust from time to time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust will use any cash that we contributed to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market through our brokerage services department.
The components of shares eligible to be issued under the Directors Plan were as follows as of December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
Unissued172,550
 $4,115
 165,436
 $3,598
173,435
 $3,902
 172,550
 $4,115
Shares held in Rabbi Trust12,761
 304
 5,130
 112
13,934
 314
 12,761
 304
Total185,311
 $4,419
 170,566
 $3,710
187,369
 $4,216
 185,311
 $4,419
Other Employee Benefit Plans
We maintain two nonqualified supplementary employee retirement plans to provide supplemental retirement benefits to specified participants. Expenses related to these programs for 2014, 2013, 2012 and 20112012 were $372, $375, $382, and $444,$382, respectively, and are being recognized over the participants’ expected years of service.
We maintain a non-leveraged ESOP which was frozen to new participants on December 31, 2006. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and are approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. During 2012, the Board of Directors approved a contribution of $75 to the ESOP. We made no contributions in 20132014 or 2011.2013. Compensation cost related to the plan for 2014, 2013, 2012 and 20112012 was $23, $29, $102, and $20,$102, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2014, 2013,, 2012, and 20112012 were 241,958, 246,404,241,958, and 246,404, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years.

85


Table of Contents

We maintain a self-funded medical plan under which we are responsible for the first $75 per year of claims made by a covered family. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and our experience. Expenses were $1,786 in 2014, $2,698 in 2013, and $2,534 in 2012 and $2,045 in 2011.2012.

84

Table of Contents

Note 1817 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
AOCI includes net income as well as unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on AFS investment securities owned and changes in the funded status of our defined benefit pension plan, which are excluded from net income. Unrealized AFS securities gains and losses and changes in the funded status of the pension plan, net of tax, are excluded from net income, and are reflected as a direct charge or credit to shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive income (loss) and the related components are disclosed in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The following table summarizes the changes in AOCI by component for the years ended December 31 (net of tax):
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
 Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost on Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
 TotalUnrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
 Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost on Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
 Total
Balance, January 1, 2011$444
 $(2,153) $(1,709)
OCI before reclassifications9,220
 (2,109) 7,111
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(3) 138
 135
Subtotal9,217
 (1,971) 7,246
Tax effect(3,719) 671
 (3,048)
OCI, net of tax5,498
 (1,300) 4,198
Balance, December 31, 20115,942
 (3,453) 2,489
Balance, January 1, 2012$5,942
 $(3,453) $2,489
OCI before reclassifications3,921
 (580) 3,341
3,921
 (580) 3,341
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(837) 251
 (586)(837) 251
 (586)
Subtotal3,084
 (329) 2,755
3,084
 (329) 2,755
Tax effect(348) 111
 (237)(348) 111
 (237)
OCI, net of tax2,736
 (218) 2,518
2,736
 (218) 2,518
Balance, December 31, 20128,678
 (3,671) 5,007
8,678
 (3,671) 5,007
OCI before reclassifications(18,971) 2,120
 (16,851)(18,971) 2,120
 (16,851)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(171) 208
 37
(171) 208
 37
Subtotal(19,142) 2,328
 (16,814)(19,142) 2,328
 (16,814)
Tax effect6,257
 (791) 5,466
6,257
 (791) 5,466
OCI, net of tax(12,885) 1,537
 (11,348)(12,885) 1,537
 (11,348)
Balance, December 31, 2013$(4,207) $(2,134) $(6,341)(4,207) (2,134) (6,341)
OCI before reclassifications11,290
 (2,836) 8,454
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(97) 300
 203
Subtotal11,193
 (2,536) 8,657
Tax effect(3,684) 862
 (2,822)
OCI, net of tax7,509
 (1,674) 5,835
Balance, December 31, 2014$3,302
 $(3,808) $(506)
Included in OCI for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 are changes in unrealized holding gains and losses related to auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks. For federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments. As such, no deferred federal income taxes related to unrealized holding gains or losses are expected or recorded.

8586


Table of Contents

A summary of the components of unrealized holding gains on AFS securities included in OCI follows for the years ended December 31:31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012

Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities TotalAuction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities Total
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period$(737) $(18,234) $(18,971) $2,059
 $1,862
 $3,921
 $(1,719) $10,939
 $9,220
$355
 $10,935
 $11,290
 $(737) $(18,234) $(18,971) $2,059
 $1,862
 $3,921
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income
 (171) (171) 
 (1,119) (1,119) 
 (3) (3)
 (97) (97) 
 (171) (171) 
 (1,119) (1,119)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
 
 
 
 282
 282
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 282
 282
Net unrealized gains (losses)(737) (18,405) (19,142) 2,059
 1,025
 3,084
 (1,719) 10,936
 9,217
355
 10,838
 11,193
 (737) (18,405) (19,142) 2,059
 1,025
 3,084
Tax effect
 6,257
 6,257
 
 (348) (348) 
 (3,719) (3,719)
 (3,684) (3,684) 
 6,257
 6,257
 
 (348) (348)
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax$(737) $(12,148) $(12,885) $2,059
 $677
 $2,736
 $(1,719) $7,217
 $5,498
$355
 $7,154
 $7,509
 $(737) $(12,148) $(12,885) $2,059
 $677
 $2,736
The following table details reclassification adjustments and the related affected line items onin our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31:31:
Details about AOCI componentsAmount
Reclassified from
AOCI
 Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Amount
Reclassified from
AOCI
 Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated
Statements of Income
2013 2012 2011 2014 2013 2012 
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS securities            
$171
 $1,119
 $3
 Net gain (loss) on sale of AFS securities$97
 $171
 $1,119
 Net gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities

 (282) 
 Net AFS impairment loss
 
 (282) Net AFS impairment loss
171
 837
 3
 Income before federal income tax expense97
 171
 837
 Income before federal income tax expense
58
 285
 1
 Federal income tax expense33
 58
 285
 Federal income tax expense
$113
 $552
 $2
 Net income$64
 $113
 $552
 Net income
            
Change in unrecognized pension cost on defined benefit pension plan            
$208
 $251
 $138
 Compensation and benefits$300
 $208
 $251
 Compensation and benefits
71
 85
 47
 Federal income tax expense102
 71
 85
 Federal income tax expense
$137
 $166
 $91
 Net income$198
 $137
 $166
 Net income

8687


Table of Contents

Note 1918 – Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, we grant loans to principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including their families and companies in which they have 10% or more ownership). Annual activity consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:31:
2013 20122014 2013
Balance, January 1$6,598
 $3,728
$4,178
 $6,598
New loans2,373
 8,435
1,475
 2,373
Repayments(4,793) (5,565)(1,831) (4,793)
Balance, December 31$4,178
 $6,598
$3,822
 $4,178
Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and their affiliates amounted to $5,861 and $6,158 and $6,871 at December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. In addition, the ESOP held deposits with the Bank aggregating $292$392 and $517,$292, respectively, at December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.
From time-to-time, we make charitable donations to the Isabella Bank Foundation (the “Foundation”), which is an affiliated nonprofit entity formed for the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient organizations generally located in the communities we service. Donations are expensed when committed to the Foundation. The assets and transactions of the Foundation are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
Assets of the Foundation include cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, and shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock. The Foundation owned 16,85034,350 and 016,850 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share.
The following table displays endingtotal asset balances of, and our donations to, the Foundation as of, and for the years ended, December 31:31:
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Ending assets$1,815
 $1,766
 $1,150
Total assets$2,090
 $1,815
 $1,766
Donations$200
 $850
 $250
$500
 $200
 $850
Note 2019 – Fair Value
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies, key inputs, and an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short term investments, including Federal funds sold,demand deposits due from banks and interest bearing balances due from banks approximate fair values. As such, we classify cash and demand deposits due from bankscash equivalents as Level 1.
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions: Interest bearing balancesCertificates of deposit held in unaffiliatedother financial institutionsinclude certificates of deposit and other short term interest bearing balances that mature within 3 years. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics. As such, we classify certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions as Level 2.
AFS and trading securities: AFS and trading securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, we compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.
Mortgage loans AFS: Mortgage loans AFS are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of Mortgage loans AFS are based on what price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, we classify Mortgage loans AFS subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

8788


Table of Contents

Loans: For variable rate loans with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. As such, we classify loans as Level 3 assets.
We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time-to-time, loans are classified as impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will be significantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, we measure the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, marketthe present value of similar debt, enterpriseexpected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value liquidation value, or discounted cash flows.of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.
We review the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types.  To determine the collateral value, we utilize independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations.  We review these valuations to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to carry and sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. We use these valuations to determine if any specific reserves or charge-offs or specific reserves are necessary. We may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or if the existing valuation is deemed to be outdated.
The following tables list the quantitative fair value information about impaired loans as of December 31:31:
20132014
Valuation TechniquesFair Value Unobservable Input RangeFair ValueUnobservable Input Range
Discounted cash flow$11,521 Duration of cash flows: 98 - 120 Months
  Reduction in interest rate from original loan terms: 3.25% - 7.57%
 Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  Discount applied to collateral appraisal: 
 Real Estate 20% - 30% Real Estate 20% - 25%
 Equipment 50% Equipment 30% - 40%
Discounted appraisal value$13,902 Livestock 50%$8,720Cash crop inventory 40%
 Cash crop inventory 50% Other inventory 75%
 Other inventory 75% Accounts receivable 50%
 Accounts receivable 75% Liquor license 75%
20122013
Valuation TechniquesFair Value Unobservable Input RangeFair ValueUnobservable Input Range
Discounted cash flow$8,726 Duration of cash flows: 14-120 Months
  Reduction in interest rate from original loan terms: 5.00% - 6.25%
 Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  Discount applied to collateral appraisal: 
 Real Estate 20% - 30% Real Estate 20% - 30%
 Equipment 50% Equipment 50%
Discounted appraisal value$13,295 Livestock 50%$13,902Livestock 50%
 Cash crop inventory 50% Cash crop inventory 50%
 Other inventory 75% Other inventory 75%
 Accounts receivable 75% Accounts receivable 75%
Discount factors with ranges are based on the age of the independent appraisal, broker price opinion, or internal evaluations.
Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest receivable as Level 1.

88

Table of Contents

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values: Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are FHLB stock and FRB stock as well as our ownership interests in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC and Valley Financial Corporation. The investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, a title insurance company, was made in the first quarter 2007.2008. We are not the managing entity of Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, and therefore, we account for our investment under the equity method of accounting. Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a de novocommunity bank that opened in 2005. We made investments in Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007.

89


Table of Contents

The lack of an active market, or other independent sources to validate fair value estimates coupled with the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. As the fair values of these investments are not readily determinable, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy; however, they are reviewed quarterly for impairment. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, it would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment. During 20132014 and 20122013, there were no impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
Foreclosed assets: Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets (which are included in other assets) are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Net realizable value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. Due to the inherent level of estimation in the valuation process, we record foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 3.
The table below lists the quantitative fair value information related to foreclosed assets as of:
December 31, 2013December 31, 2014
Valuation TechniquesFair Value Unobservable Input RangeFair Value Unobservable Input Range
  Discount applied to collateral appraisal:   Discount applied to collateral appraisal: 
Discounted appraisal value$1,412
 Real Estate 20% - 30%$885
 Real Estate 20% - 25%
December 31, 2012December 31, 2013
Valuation TechniquesFair Value Unobservable Input RangeFair Value Unobservable Input Range
  Discount applied to collateral appraisal:   Discount applied to collateral appraisal: 
Discounted appraisal value$2,018
 Real Estate 20% - 30%$1,412
 Real Estate 20% - 30%
Discount factors with ranges are based on the age of the independent appraisal, broker price opinion, or internal evaluations.
Goodwill and other intangible assets: Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of acquisition intangibles or goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired, we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. If the testing resulted in impairment, we would classify goodwill and other acquisition intangibles subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 20132014 and 20122013, there were no impairments recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangibles.
OMSRsOMSR: OMSRsOMSR (which are included in other assets) are subject to impairment testing. To test for impairment, we utilize a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and discount rates. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, OMSRsOMSR are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, we classify OMSRsOMSR subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Deposits: The fair value of demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts),amounts and are classified as Level 1. Fair values for variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. As such, fixed rate certificates of deposit are classified as Level 2.
Borrowed funds: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. The fair values of other borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current incremental borrowing arrangements. As such, borrowed funds are classified as Level 2.

89

Table of Contents

We previously elected to measure a portion of borrowed funds at fair value. These borrowings were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value measurement estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Changes in the fair value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income.
The activity in borrowings which we have elected to carry at fair value was as follows for the year ended December 31:
 2012
Borrowings carried at fair value - beginning of year$5,242
Paydowns and maturities(5,209)
Net unrealized change in fair value(33)
Borrowings carried at fair value - December 31$
Unpaid principal balance - December 31$
Accrued interest payable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest payable approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest payable as Level 1.
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed loans: Our commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed funds have no carrying amount and are estimated to have no realizable fair value. Historically, a majority of the unused commitments to extend credit have not been drawn upon and, generally, we do not receive fees in connection with these commitments other than standby letter of credit fees, which are not significant.

90


Table of Contents

The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.
Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.

90


The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on our consolidated balance sheets are as follows as of as of December 31:
 2013
 Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$41,558
 $41,558
 $41,558
 $
 $
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions580
 582
 
 582
 
Mortgage loans AFS1,104
 1,123
 
 1,123
 
Total loans808,037
 808,246
 
 
 808,246
Less allowance for loan and lease losses(11,500) (11,500) 
 
 (11,500)
Net loans796,537
 796,746
 
 
 796,746
Accrued interest receivable5,442
 5,442
 5,442
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)18,293
 18,293
 
 
 
OMSRs2,555
 2,667
 
 2,667
 
LIABILITIES         
Deposits without stated maturities593,754
 593,754
 593,754
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities450,012
 452,803
 
 452,803
 
Borrowed funds279,326
 283,060
 
 283,060
 
Accrued interest payable633
 633
 633
 
 
 2012
 Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$24,920
 $24,920
 $24,920
 $
 $
Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions4,465
 4,475
 
 4,475
 
Mortgage loans AFS3,633
 3,680
 
 3,680
 
Total loans772,753
 784,964
 
 
 784,964
Less allowance for loan and lease losses(11,936) (11,936) 
 
 (11,936)
Net loans760,817
 773,028
 
 
 773,028
Accrued interest receivable5,227
 5,227
 5,227
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)18,118
 18,118
 
 
 
OMSRs2,285
 2,285
 
 2,285
 
LIABILITIES         
Deposits without stated maturities553,332
 553,332
 553,332
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities464,335
 472,630
 
 472,630
 
Borrowed funds241,001
 248,822
 
 248,822
 
Accrued interest payable751
 751
 751
 
 
(1)
Due to the characteristics of equity securities without readily determinable fair values, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, such amount would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment.

91


Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
 2013 2012
 Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Recurring items               
Trading securities               
States and political subdivisions$525
 $
 $525
 $
 $1,573
 $
 $1,573
 $
AFS securities               
Government-sponsored enterprises23,745
 
 23,745
 
 25,776
 
 25,776
 
States and political subdivisions201,988
 
 201,988
 
 182,743
 
 182,743
 
Auction rate money market preferred2,577
 
 2,577
 
 2,778
 
 2,778
 
Preferred stocks5,827
 5,827
 
 
 6,363
 6,363
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities144,115
 
 144,115
 
 155,345
 
 155,345
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations133,810
 
 133,810
 
 131,005
 
 131,005
 
Total AFS securities512,062
 5,827
 506,235
 
 504,010
 6,363
 497,647
 
Nonrecurring items               
Impaired loans (net of the ALLL)25,423
 
 
 25,423
 22,021
 
 
 22,021
Foreclosed assets1,412
 
 
 1,412
 2,018
 
 
 2,018
 $539,422
 $5,827
 $506,760
 $26,835
 $529,622
 $6,363
 $499,220
 $24,039
Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value  1.08% 93.95% 4.97%   1.20% 94.26% 4.54%
The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, for which gains or losses were recognized in the years ended December 31:
 2013 2012

Trading
Losses
 Other Gains
(Losses)
 Total Trading
Losses
 Other Gains
(Losses)
 Total
Recurring items           
Trading securities$(28) $
 $(28) $(52) $
 $(52)
Borrowed funds
 
 
 
 33
 33
Nonrecurring items          
Foreclosed assets
 (156) (156) 
 (166) (166)
Total$(28) $(156) $(184) $(52) $(133) $(185)

9291



Note 2120 – Parent Company Only Financial Information
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31December 31
2013 20122014 2013
ASSETS      
Cash on deposit at the Bank$529
 $332
$1,035
 $529
AFS securities3,542
 3,939
3,294
 3,542
Investments in subsidiaries110,192
 115,781
124,827
 110,192
Premises and equipment2,013
 2,041
1,982
 2,013
Other assets54,223
 52,398
53,228
 54,223
TOTAL ASSETS$170,499
 $174,491
$184,366
 $170,499
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Other liabilities$9,890
 $10,002
$9,772
 $9,890
Shareholders' equity160,609
 164,489
174,594
 160,609
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$170,499
 $174,491
$184,366
 $170,499
Condensed Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31

2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Income          
Dividends from subsidiaries$7,000
 $6,125
 $6,500
$7,000
 $7,000
 $6,125
Interest income161
 174
 128
150
 161
 174
Management fee and other2,146
 2,037
 1,201
3,665
 2,146
 2,037
Total income9,307
 8,336
 7,829
10,815
 9,307
 8,336
Expenses          
Compensation and benefits2,811
 2,424
 2,267
3,688
 2,811
 2,424
Occupancy and equipment476
 370
 370
1,082
 476
 370
Audit and related fees345
 351
 378
404
 345
 351
Other958
 945
 1,089
1,395
 958
 945
Total expenses4,590
 4,090
 4,104
6,569
 4,590
 4,090
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries4,717
 4,246
 3,725
4,246
 4,717
 4,246
Federal income tax benefit790
 673
 958
940
 790
 673
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries5,507
 4,919
 4,683
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries5,186
 5,507
 4,919
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries7,003
 7,287
 5,527
8,538
 7,003
 7,287
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206


9392


Table of Contents

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Operating Activities     
Operating activities     
Net income$12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
$13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations          
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries(7,003) (7,287) (5,527)(8,538) (7,003) (7,287)
Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values74
 (459) 160
37
 74
 (459)
Share-based payment awards554
 643
 615
495
 554
 643
Depreciation174
 114
 123
144
 174
 114
Net amortization of AFS securities2
 4
 7
1
 2
 4
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)(305) 425
 (48)(159) (305) 425
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which used cash     
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash     
Other assets(51) (513) 7
145
 (51) (513)
Accrued interest and other liabilities1,238
 (98) 757
1,516
 1,238
 (98)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities7,193
 5,035
 6,304
7,365
 7,193
 5,035
Investing activities          
Maturities, calls, and sales of AFS securities395
 370
 585
Purchases
 
 (3,000)
Purchases of equipment and premises(146) (239) (87)
Maturities, calls, principal repayments, and sales of AFS securities250
 395
 370
Purchases of premises and equipment(81) (146) (239)
Advances to subsidiaries, net of repayments(299) (50) 
641
 (299) (50)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(50) 81
 (2,502)810
 (50) 81
Financing activities          
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds(1,350) (597) 2,772
(1,600) (1,350) (597)
Cash dividends paid on common stock(6,456) (6,074) (5,770)(6,843) (6,456) (6,074)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock3,618
 2,898
 2,302
4,227
 3,618
 2,898
Common stock repurchased(2,375) (1,980) (1,507)(3,122) (2,375) (1,980)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations(383) (505) (426)(331) (383) (505)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(6,946) (6,258) (2,629)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(7,669) (6,946) (6,258)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents197
 (1,142) 1,173
506
 197
 (1,142)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year332
 1,474
 301
529
 332
 1,474
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$529
 $332
 $1,474
$1,035
 $529
 $332
Note 2221 – Operating Segments
Our reportable segments are based on legal entities that account for at least 10% of net operating results. The operations of the Bank as of December 31, 20132014, 20122013, and 20112012 represent approximately 90% or more of our consolidated total assets and operating results. As such, no additional segment reporting is presented.

9493


Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION
Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 30, 2014,Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Comfort Inn Conference Center, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.
Financial Information and Form 10-K
Copies of the 20132014 Annual Report, Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, and other financial information not contained herein are available on the Bank’s website (www.isabellabank.com) under the Investors tab, or may be obtained, without charge, by writing to:
Debra Campbell
Secretary
Isabella Bank Corporation
401 N. Main St.
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858
Mission Statement
To create an operating environment that will provide shareholders with sustained growth in their investment while maintaining our independence and subsidiaries’ autonomy.
Equal Employment Opportunity
The equal employment opportunity clauses in Section 202 of the Executive Order 11246, as amended; 38 USC 2012, Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974; Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; relative to equal employment opportunity and implementing rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor are adhered to and supported by Isabella Bank Corporation, and its subsidiaries.


9594


Table of Contents





Table of Contents